Should a 97 year old man be driving on a public road?

Permabanned
Joined
28 Nov 2003
Posts
10,695
Location
Shropshire
Ask any insurance company who are higher motor cover risks, 97 year olds or young male drivers... I know at least two over 90 year old drivers who I would much rather be a passenger to than dozens of sub 25 year olds. I smell some hatred of blue blood gathering ;) At least he wasn't involved in a multiple fatality accident on the way home in the early hours after a suspected drug selling outing, doing manic speeds whilst under the influence of narcotics himself... I would also imagine he was accompanied by Royal protection squad officers, maybe someone here will say they should have a claim against the Duke of Edinburgh? I wish The Prince good luck in getting over this and hope he gets back behind the wheel again soon to spite the haters :)
 
Permabanned
Joined
28 Nov 2003
Posts
10,695
Location
Shropshire
I wonder if the driver of the other car was "slitty eyed"?


I think most of us would be "slitty eyed" finding two and a half ton of Range Rover in our path on a fast main road :) I know I would be, and clenched buttocked too. Not to mention the protection officer(s) might feel a bit trigger happy in case it was some terrorist incident.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2010
Posts
23,812
Location
Lincs
We require HGV drivers to have a medical to determine fitness every 5 years from age 45 and annually from 65, I don't see the issue of having something similar for car driving, even if you altered the age ranges
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2010
Posts
23,812
Location
Lincs
Dont go bringing logic and evidence into this!

But like I said, it's generally for different reasons and needs different solutions. One is from inexeprience and one is from physical deterioration. It's not that draconian to have to pass a fitness to drive test after a certain age. No one is saying they can't drive if passed fit to do so.
 
Associate
Joined
16 Jan 2015
Posts
183
but isn't it also being assumed the driver caused the accident due to his age and not other circumstances - i.e. just not paying attention , blindspot etc.
What's to say any other driver of any age may not have caused the same accident under similar circumstances ?
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Jan 2004
Posts
32,113
Location
Rutland
But like I said, it's generally for different reasons and needs different solutions. One is from inexeprience and one is from physical deterioration. It's not that draconian to have to pass a fitness to drive test after a certain age. No one is saying they can't drive if passed fit to do so.

Isn't that exactly what Billy was suggesting?

Yeah there's defo an age, somewhere between 70 and 80, where you need to be stopping driving. People should do this voluntarily as part of being a responsible driver. No shame in it.
 
I haz 4090!
Don
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
8,012
Location
Manchester
but isn't it also being assumed the driver caused the accident due to his age and not other circumstances - i.e. just not paying attention , blindspot etc.
What's to say any other driver of any age may not have caused the same accident under similar circumstances ?

That's what I was thinking! I'm no advocate of roads full of century-old drivers, but from what I've seen he's a pretty good driver.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2010
Posts
23,812
Location
Lincs
Isn't that exactly what Billy was suggesting?

Not really, because he seems to be advocating an arbitrary age that people should stop driving - albeit from a voluntary decision at the moment. Whereas having a rudimentary medical check at certain periods from an age where we know attributes deteriorate faster isn't stopping anyone who is fit to drive.
 
Back
Top Bottom