Normal sporty car 10k per year is fine. Evan a 911 with 40k Miles is easy to sell.
On the other hand my lambo has 40k and I could not move it for love nor money.
50k is nothing lol.
my lexus is tickling 115k and no issues with it at all... modern engines can take the miles.
Hey all,
Currently looking to replace my weekend car, I have seen a nice Z4 35is in a gorgeous colour with mileage in the 50k range with just one owner from 2011. Now typically I always try to get sports cars around the 30k mile mark or less if I can. 50k really feels quite high to me, Are cars with 80-90k miles on sell-able? What are your thoughts guys?
Thanks!
That depends on if it’s say 4 years old or 30 surely?
Well that’s exactly my point isn’t it? - a 30yr old car with 120k under its wheels is by definition low mileage given it’s averaged 4K p/a so as you say points to an easy pampered existence.
Exactly.Mileage is not a good measure of wear.
A 1 year old car can have 50k on it, where a single person has driven up and down the country each day. They get in the car by themselves (no wear on the other seats) and drive 200 miles without getting out mostly in the same gear on a hot engine without speed bumps or heavy brake use, and park in an place where it won't get bashed.
A car can have 50k on it full of school runs on a cold engine, kerbed wheels, a messy interior from badly behaved kids and the driver getting in and out every 5 miles (seat wear). There could be carpark dings, bumper scuffs and an overdue cambelt.
The context of this thread is Sports cars, I'd guess one thats only done 4k p/a average had indeed had a pampered life,by definition it'll be a second car, a run of the mill Fiesta / whatever much less so.How does an *average* of 4k per annum point you to believe that it's had a pampered life?? I know so many people who drive 1-2 miles to work a day and probably do an average of 4k miles a year. But this doesn't mean their cars somehow become cherished examples, afterall, the car gets subjected to high numbers of cold starts/stop start traffic/speed bumps and dodgy car parks.
The notion that A) low miles per year or B) averaging low miles out per year somehow means that the car is of better quality or of a higher standard is ridiculous. If a 3 year old car has done 60k miles - it has a high average miles per year, but i'm guessing this car which will have spent it's life on the motorway will be in a far better condition than a 3 year old car which has done 30k miles around town and on a cold engine.
Only in exceptional circumstances should the notion that miles per year be taken as anything more than guff, such as the above example - a lot of miles in on a relatively new car, aside from being anything like a police/rental/taxi could be indicative that the engine/suspension/brakes/bodywork have been put through the minimal amount of stress. Likewise, very low mileage on an old car, could be indicative of it being a garage queen which only was brought out on sunny days like most supercars are. Apart from these extremes, "10k average miles per year" means jack shizzle.
Where were you when I was trying to sell my 107,000 mile 911 turboMileage is not a good measure of wear.
A 1 year old car can have 50k on it, where a single person has driven up and down the country each day. They get in the car by themselves (no wear on the other seats) and drive 200 miles without getting out mostly in the same gear on a hot engine without speed bumps or heavy brake use, and park in an place where it won't get bashed.
A car can have 50k on it full of school runs on a cold engine, kerbed wheels, a messy interior from badly behaved kids and the driver getting in and out every 5 miles (seat wear). There could be carpark dings, bumper scuffs and an overdue cambelt.
If the OP's car had been a 100k on it but had been owned from one owner from new and was pristine, with an owner that was able to provide answers on all technical questions then I'd still buy it.
Is yours the one online at 127k?
I will admit when I spoke to Lamborghini I gave them a mileage limit of 15k with ideally a 10k target as it seems they become very hard to move on above 20k miles, crazy because the Huracan is an R8, it will happily reach 100k miles on the engine/drive train, you might go through a few dampers and if the CCM brakes fail change to steels or do so early on and put CCM back on when selling.
I admit I'd probably low ball a high miles Huracan, suspect trade prices would be 100-110k on a 40k plus miler, maybe advertise at 115-125k retail to see if anyone bites.
Yes It’s the one up for 127k but it’s been traded already.
Mileage is not a good measure of wear.
A 1 year old car can have 50k on it, where a single person has driven up and down the country each day. They get in the car by themselves (no wear on the other seats) and drive 200 miles without getting out mostly in the same gear on a hot engine without speed bumps or heavy brake use, and park in an place where it won't get bashed.
A car can have 50k on it full of school runs on a cold engine, kerbed wheels, a messy interior from badly behaved kids and the driver getting in and out every 5 miles (seat wear). There could be carpark dings, bumper scuffs and an overdue cambelt.
If the OP's car had been a 100k on it but had been owned from one owner from new and was pristine, with an owner that was able to provide answers on all technical questions then I'd still buy it.
Oof...Thanks for the input everyone, much appreciated. I ended up going for a different car in the end due to the original not having enough specifications for my liking. The car is newer and has just 21k on the clock so I am a happy camper![]()