Contracted developer demands obscene hours payment

Soldato
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Posts
4,325
Location
North West
While I am going to get some proper legal advice tomorrow on this, I wondered if anyone had dealt with something similar.

I contracted a former colleague to do some work developing an application for me and someone else, on a per hour basis.

The developer firstly claimed an obscene amount of hours worked at 425 for something that barely exists or works. The app doesn't is buggy, doesn't work, is built against best practices and has a chrome plugin that does not even work.

Then all of a sudden he decided to walk away from the project and demanded £2,000 to hand over the code of the project. It took us a while to respond due one of us having a new baby and the other one moving house/job, but now he has sought legal advice and is requesting £2,650 payment.

His original request did not provide a period of time to respond before further action taken and just the day before the email from this tin-pot legal firm, he asked any further update to which that we would provide a respond by tomorrow.

While we we're happy to pay the £2,000 just to end all this civilly even though we dispute the amount, the fact he has got a tin pot legal firm with no prior warning and demanding extra money has put a few bees in our bonnet.

Now that he has this 'legal advice', is it too late to send a letter of dispute over the work carried out now that we have seen the actual output of the work, even if we did, would it get us anywhere as it's based upon the reliability of his word?
 
Soldato
Joined
16 Jun 2013
Posts
5,381
If there's no contract it's going to be hard for him to go after you.

From my experience he should be able to account for the hours spent. Seems a rather large amount of hours for such a low amount demanded, even to make it "go away".

Legal advice is the only real solution.
 
Sgarrista
Commissario
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Posts
10,421
Location
Bromsgrove
Above advise wrong.

Actually quite easy for you to argue this in your favor as even though you have agreed to pay him a set amount per hour, no court will accept that you hired him to provide a non-functioning product. As long as it is as crap as you say it is and doesnt work then he has failed to provide work of an acceptable standard.

Go back and say that you'll agree to his £XXXX fee as long as the work is completed, working and bug free within X timeframe (whatever seems appropriate).
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,910
Location
Northern England
Above advise wrong.

Actually quite easy for you to argue this in your favor as even though you have agreed to pay him a set amount per hour, no court will accept that you hired him to provide a non-functioning product. As long as it is as crap as you say it is and doesnt work then he has failed to provide work of an acceptable standard.

Go back and say that you'll agree to his £XXXX fee as long as the work is completed, working and bug free within X timeframe (whatever seems appropriate).

The problem is that the guy doesn't seem to be claiming the app is complete. So at this point - if he can prove the hours spent so far then he can demand payment for work completed to date.
 
Sgarrista
Commissario
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Posts
10,421
Location
Bromsgrove
The problem is that the guy doesn't seem to be claiming the app is complete. So at this point - if he can prove the hours spent so far then he can demand payment for work completed to date.

Nope. He has a duty to provide a standard of work, if that standard has not been met he should be allowed to rectify it, but if he doesnt then you have a very strong legal standing not to pay:

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1982/29

In fact, it is quite the opposite, if the code is buggy and non-functional you could sue him to have his crap code corrected if they buy it and have to have it fixed!!!
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Posts
4,325
Location
North West
It sounds as if the "App" doesn't work and is bug ridden - why on Earth do you want the code :confused:

I accept it's our fault for paying per hour not for a set deliverable, so lesson learnt on that front. The tin pot lawyer is demanding the payment anyway now for the hours worked, I assume the increase is to cover his fee.

How long between his invoice and now?

He has never sent an invoice, he sent an email demanding £2000 payment to hand over the code since he was going to stop working on the project. Never an actual demand to pay for the hours.

How long is “a while to respond”?
6 weeks which is a long time I know, but one of us had a new born with complications and I was moving job and house so had my mind elsewhere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,910
Location
Northern England
Nope. He has a duty to provide a standard of work, if that standard has not been met he should be allowed to rectify it, but if he doesnt then you have a very strong legal standing not to pay:

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1982/29

In fact, it is quite the opposite, if the code is buggy and non-functional you could sue him to have his crap code corrected if they buy it and have to have it fixed!!!

But there's no contract formed ergo no agreed scope. Without an agreed scope or defined end-product how can you say something doesn't do what it's supposed to do? All he has to do is argue that it is part of ongoing works that seemingly the OP doesn't wish to pay for.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Posts
4,325
Location
North West
But there's no contract formed ergo no agreed scope. Without an agreed scope or defined end-product how can you say something doesn't do what it's supposed to do? All he has to do is argue that it is part of ongoing works that seemingly the OP doesn't wish to pay for.

Well he's delivered functionality that doesn't work, i.e. a chrome plugin that doesn't do anything.
 
Back
Top Bottom