Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Again, I'm not going through a list of 16000 'lies' to verify them. You do the verification, with date and place where he said them, and I may look into it. Again, I obviously conceed the point that he lies, I've said it 5+ times now, but they all lie.

Think about it, 20 lies per day for POTUS is not many at all, how many do you think Hillary would have made in this time?

It is a lot. Trumps lies vs Obama, its lolworthy. "In his first 10 months, Trump told nearly six times as many falsehoods as Obama did during his entire presidency"

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/14/opinion/sunday/trump-lies-obama-who-is-worse.html

Doubt Hillary could lie as much.

Also pages of them here.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/list/?speaker=donald-trump&ruling=false

You have no defence for this, hes a liar and/or an idiot.
 
My thought exactly.

Apparently being ex cia means you have magic computer powers.

No, it means, like me, he read the report that was put out about the DNC 'hack'.

Got anything else to say about my response to your pathetic attempt to disprove me?

Anything??
 
Doubt Hillary could lie as much.

You don't give her credit, she has been lying ALL her life, she was one of the dirtiest politicians out there - where do you think all that money in the 'Clinton Foundation' came from? I came from people/governments that bought access/laws/policies to benefit them, like Uranium one for example..
 
So our fellow trump supporters what say you??
Is this appropriate for a President to do?? During the national anthem, you know the one he’s so adamant to protect and will try and nail anyone to the wall if they should ever slightly disrespect it.
Not appropriate really, but then again it's not like you found the smoking gun either.. It's not like he sold 1/5th of american uranium to the Ruskies is it? Oh, my bad, that was Hillary - with a nice contribution to the Clinton Foundation anything is possible.

And it's not the nation anthem he's adamant to protect it's the CONSTITUTION.

0.5/10 - Must try harder.
 
Not appropriate really, but then again it's not like you found the smoking gun either.. It's not like he sold 1/5th of american uranium to the Ruskies is it? Oh, my bad, that was Hillary - with a nice contribution to the Clinton Foundation anything is possible.

And it's not the nation anthem he's adamant to protect it's the CONSTITUTION.

0.5/10 - Must try harder.
You claim you're an independent thinker and don't parrot things yet all you seem to do is parrot debunked CTs...
 
Not appropriate really, but then again it's not like you found the smoking gun either.. It's not like he sold 1/5th of american uranium to the Ruskies is it? Oh, my bad, that was Hillary - with a nice contribution to the Clinton Foundation anything is possible.

And it's not the nation anthem he's adamant to protect it's the CONSTITUTION.

0.5/10 - Must try harder.

Bit of whataboutism. Even then isn't that the nonsense CT from Breibart, that bastion of moderate, well researched 'news'? Didn't Trump ask the AG to look into it and they found nothing?
 
No, it means, like me, he read the report that was put out about the DNC 'hack'.

Got anything else to say about my response to your pathetic attempt to disprove me?

Anything??
He read the report about the hack and came to a completely different conclusion bases on the speed at which files where transferred?
Which completely ignores the fact that there are a multitude of things that affect file transfer speeds to the point you have no way of telling from them how the data was transferred because except under lab conditions it will vary, let alone on a machine that is active and working as a server.
My examples were exactly that, examples to show how much of a nonsense time taken to copy files is for working out the medium used for the transfer, I've seen usb2 transfers faster than internal drive to drive transfers because one of the internal drives was a normal HDD and it was a lot of small files, whilst the external device was an SSD connected via usb2 which had no issue with them, I've had downloads to my PC that have nearly maxed out an internal drive via ethernet.

Funnily enough though, sever logs do often note what IP's accessed what files and IIRC that's how the investigators for the actual report came to it's conclusion...

I wonder when you'll start claiming the serer is in the Ukraine.

IIRC last time this was post in the SC thread it was claimed that there was some sort of marker on the files that showed it was obviously copied via usb.
 
Last edited:
Not appropriate really, but then again it's not like you found the smoking gun either.. It's not like he sold 1/5th of american uranium to the Ruskies is it? Oh, my bad, that was Hillary - with a nice contribution to the Clinton Foundation anything is possible.

And it's not the nation anthem he's adamant to protect it's the CONSTITUTION.

0.5/10 - Must try harder.

Is this the "CT bingo thread"?

That ones been debunked so, so many times.

IIRC Clinton recused herself from involvement into that decision and the Uranium wasn't "sold to russia", the mining company was bought by a Russian company but there is a big difference between approving the sale of a mining company and the sale of the mined materials...
For example a mining company can be sold to a different operator, but it has zero effect on who receives the mined materials.
 
Explain? At least give me something to go on as that was as vague as you can get..

I'm not sure how it was vague. You parrot debunked CTs...

Uranium One has been debunked
Clinton Foundation
Seth Rich
etc etc

All debunked CTs. You only seem to think that the Dems are criminals and seem to blindly ignore any crimes from the other side or simply write them off as "bullcrap".

I seem to think differently than most in here would you say?
Differently to people on here, maybe, but exactly the same as people who tune in to Hannity/Infowars and who read all the right-wing websites. Just look at some replies to Trump's tweets, to Dan Bongino's tweets, Charlie Kirk's tweets, etc etc.
 
Not appropriate really, but then again it's not like you found the smoking gun either.. It's not like he sold 1/5th of american uranium to the Ruskies is it? Oh, my bad, that was Hillary - with a nice contribution to the Clinton Foundation anything is possible.

And it's not the nation anthem he's adamant to protect it's the CONSTITUTION.

0.5/10 - Must try harder.
Lol and there we have it folks.

Mind blown with the utter stupidity spouted by hominid as usual lol.
 
Is this the "CT bingo thread"?

That ones been debunked so, so many times.

IIRC Clinton recused herself from involvement into that decision and the Uranium wasn't "sold to russia", the mining company was bought by a Russian company but there is a big difference between approving the sale of a mining company and the sale of the mined materials...
For example a mining company can be sold to a different operator, but it has zero effect on who receives the mined materials.

He wont listen to you because Trump said so but obviously being a independant thinker and not a Trump supporter :D thats the most sensible thing to say.....wait what :eek: lol

As far as deflector shields go, Trump fans make the Enterprise look like a Fisher-Price toy :D

ROFL - in stitches lol. Sorry it had to be done HaHa

 
IIRC last time this was post in the SC thread it was claimed that there was some sort of marker on the files that showed it was obviously copied via usb.
It's all in the timestamps. They line up, almost to the second, that showed a transfer speed @USB2 max speed - yes. Bill Binnie, with the help of another company tried to transfer across the Atlantic, to various destinations, and didn't get even half that speed. It's all in the report, educate yourself and read it, even the FBI said the conclusions they reached couldn't be completely verified.
 
Lol and there we have it folks.

Mind blown with the utter stupidity spouted by hominid as usual lol.

lol - which part..? Non specific, like almost everyone in this thread attacking me.

Just straight to the insults.. :)



Educate yourself: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Nothing to see - move along..
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom