Donald Trump

[Jono8]

I know there was at least one, she told a reporter they didn't make a case - a woman. Could be lying though - I'll see if I can find it.

What is this!?

They literally just had the vote and every single Dem voted guilty on both articles.

 

[JRS]

I know there was at least one, she told a reporter they didn't make a case - a woman. Could be lying though - I'll see if I can find it.

You "know" there was one, eh? Are you sure?

 

[Crpwned]

For the third time in US history, a president was impeached.

For the first time in US history, a Senator of the impeached president's own party voted to remove him.

November should be interesting.

 

[hominid]

What is this!?

They literally just had the vote and every single Dem voted guilty on both articles.

It was on CNN so it could be FAKE NEWS..

Trump 2020!!!!


#PelosiTantrum

 

[plasmahal]

It was on CNN so it IS FAKE NEWS..

FTFY.

 

[Jono8]

It was on CNN so it could be FAKE NEWS..

Trump 2020!!!!


#PelosiTantrum

What?

You could just be an adult and admit you were wrong about an easily provable fact.

 

[Sankari]

* Abuse of power: 48/52
* Obstruction of Congress: 47/53

Closer than I expected.

Meanwhile, Democrats are moving ahead with their investigation of Trump's corrupt quid pro quo:

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that it is "likely" House Democrats will subpoena former national security adviser John Bolton and continue investigations into President Trump's hold on military aid to Ukraine, according to CNN's Manu Raju.

...Bolton alleges in the manuscript of forthcoming book that Trump explicitly tied the Ukraine aid to political investigations of his opponents, including former Vice President Joe Biden and his family, and asked in early May to ensure that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would meet with Rudy Giuliani.

(Source).

 

[hominid]

You "know" there was one, eh? Are you sure?

I just watched the video of her saying it - can't find it.. It doesn't matter now as the results are in.

 

[JRS]

I just watched the video of her saying it - can't find it.. It doesn't matter now as the results are in.

Well, if you watched the video then presumably you know the name of the senator in question?

 

[hominid]

What?

You could just be an adult and admit you were wrong about an easily provable fact.

Again, I, in the last half an hour, watch a short clip - I also said, IN THE POST, she could be lying - looks to be the case

 

[Pottsey]

Well that just goes to show how rigged this joke trail was. Nothing like going into a trail which doesn’t allow witness’s or new evidence and knowing the final vote 53-47 long before the vote has even taken place. Kind of of waste of weeks when we all had the results before the trial even started. Precisely the expected outcome. Its completely wrong that both sides have decided what to vote before the trail even started.

 

[hominid]

Well, if you watched the video then presumably you know the name of the senator in question?

I've got about 100 Firefox tabs open so it's hard to find..

 

[Jono8]

Again, I, in the last half an hour, watch a short clip - I also said, IN THE POST, she could be lying - looks to be the case

No, the question was:

Which Democrats voted to acquit, @deuse?

To which you replied:

I know there was at least one, she told a reporter they didn't make a case - a woman. Could be lying though - I'll see if I can find it.

You said that you KNEW there was at least one who voted to acquit.

You either didn't read/understand the question, or are just completely wrong.

 

[JRS]

Again, I, in the last half an hour, watch a short clip - I also said, IN THE POST, she could be lying - looks to be the case

I've got about 100 Firefox tabs open so it's hard to find..

I'm going to take a wild guess since you mentioned that the senator in question was female that you're talking about Susan Collins. The same Susan Collins who is, in fact, a Republican.

 

[sideways14a]

What a complete waste of time and money.

What does this bent orange **** need to do? Murder someone on camera? That will still prob get him votes to be honest...

 

[timmeh]

What a complete waste of time and money.

What does this bent orange **** need to do? Murder someone on camera? That will still prob get him votes to be honest...

They'd acquit him anyway because it would be too hurtful to his supporters. Same reasons as this time.

 

[hominid]

No, the question was:



To which you replied:

I know there was at least one, she told a reporter they didn't make a case - a woman. Could be lying though - I'll see if I can find it.

You said that you KNEW there was at least one who voted to acquit.

You either didn't read/understand the question, or are just completely wrong.

let me make this easy for you

Could be lying though

as in, she could be lying - jesus..

you really got me there - good job...

 

[wesimmo]

What is this!?

They literally just had the vote and every single Dem voted guilty on both articles.

And this is why arguing with idiots like this is pointless, they can't even admit a fact that has been reported as having happened, yet we're supposed to "go and do your own research" to verify their ridiculous claims.

 

[hominid]

They'd acquit him anyway because it would be too hurtful to his supporters. Same reasons as this time.

Rubbish.

 

[hominid]

No, the question was:



To which you replied:



You said that you KNEW there was at least one who voted to acquit.

You either didn't read/understand the question, or are just completely wrong.

Again, for the hard of hearing... I watched a video of a dem congresswoman say that it wasn't proven and she would vote to acquite - simple.

Also, it's irrellevant - TRUMP 2020.

Total waste of $10m's - good job democrates. On to the next one.