So you didn't understand or read the question then. The question was "Which Democrats voted to acquit". The question was posed after the votes took place. An easily answered question. No one asked if they had seen a senator say something about how they might vote at some point in the past.
Donald Trump
- Thread starter wez130
- Start date
- Status
So you didn't understand or read the question then. The question was "Which Democrats voted to acquit". The question was posed after the votes took place. An easily answered question. No one asked if they had seen a senator say something about how they might vote at some point in the past.
Did you though? (not that this is relevant to JRS's question)
I can see what the vote is, I just can't find the video - twitter is a nightmare trying to find stuff.
Again, it doesn't matter. Of course all the DEMS voted on both counts, that's what got us here in the first place...
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,085
How much have all those Hilary Clinton investigations, that turned up nothing, cost?
AGAIN - I CAN'T FIND THE VIDEO I WATCHED.
I don't know many politicians, especially all of the democrats - can you name them all?
There is very obviously a LOT of dirt on her! Also obvious is that she is a VERY powerful person who is, after spending most of her adult life in the upper echelons of the american political system, very well connected.
That is why she is not in prison - yet.
Irrelevant.
That had nothing to do with the question. The question was:
The answer is none.
So you're not very good at investigating things then?
You think you saw something, you can't be sure, can't prove it but you're going to state it as fact on the internet.
I know the answer is none. I know...
I'm trying to get through to you that I watched a video of a democrat woman saying she was going to acquit on both counts. It was on CNN so I automatically put she could be lying - apparently I was right.
If I could find that video on the sand pit that is twitter I would. But again it's irrelevant. If I find it later I will tag you for it.
Even if true (and unless you can link to the video, it remains another fantasy of yours), it is irrelevant.
The vote happened, and the results could be easily found.
It is OK to admit you were wrong. It shows character.
Hang on, run that one by me again. A Democrat congresswoman? Said she would vote to acquit in a senate vote?
Uh...
Better than you it seems.
Didn't say that.
or that.
I stated that it was probably her lying in the original post for christs sake...
See how twisted you have to make things? Get a life.
I can well believe you are actually Trump himself, doing like he did with radio shows and pretending to be someone else.
How can you even try and spin you mis-answering a question with a lie as you being right?
I don't lie.
I know it irrelevant - so why keep on about it if it's a massive deal.
I know... I saw them when they were announced.
lol - you talking to me about character. I've told you, now lots of times, that it was wrong, and obviously so.
I saw the video, reported it as probably lying as it was on CNN, but I didn't save it to a new tab like I normally do and now can't find it.
Again, it's IRRELEVENT.
TRUMP 2020...
It was all rigged before trump became president.
Wow, you are losing it.
Okay...
I stated IN THE ORIGINAL POST that it could be ******** - I really don't get it.
no, the house needs to prove he committed an impeachable crime which he didn't. Also, would have more credibility if the impeachment was bi-partisan which it wasn't and was on the cards before trump became president.
The same they did for Clinton.... OKAY!!!!!
- Status