Donald Trump

Jono8 · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:32

hominid said:
I don't lie.

I know... I saw them when they were announced.

So why did you say that you knew at least one Democrat voted to acquit? :confused:

hominid said:
I know there was at least one, she told a reporter they didn't make a case - a woman. Could be lying though - I'll see if I can find it.

So again, you either didn't read or understand the question, or you were wrong.

Crpwned · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:32

hominid said:
I don't lie.

*insert J Jonah Jameson laughing gif*

hominid · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:33

JRS said:
@hominid - this one?

If so, note the (R) in her job title.

Good call, but not that - at least you've been looking, thanks!

hominid · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:33

Crpwned said:
*insert J Jonah Jameson laughing gif*

Why do you show up with the low effort posts, do you need access to the MM or something?

plasmahal · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:35

Jono8 said:
Even if true (and unless you can link to the video, it remains another fantasy of yours), it is irrelevant.

He's already said that several times, you just keep banging the same drum in a pointless manner as usual.

Jono8 · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:37

plasmahal said:
He's already said that several times, you just keep banging the same drum in a pointless manner as usual.

Yes it is irrelevant, so he was wrong.

JRS · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:39

hominid said:
Good call, but not that - at least you've been looking, thanks!

Help me out here a bit. D'you remember her hair colour? Skin colour? Vaguely what she was wearing?

There's only 17 female Democrat senators, so it should be fairly easy for me to find the vid clip that you're on about.

Colonel_Klinck · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:40

The only POTUS to ever have a member of his own party vote to convict.

hominid · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:41

Jono8 said:
So why did you say that you knew at least one Democrat voted to acquit?

Ok, you got me - feel better?

So again, you either didn't read or understand the question, or you were wrong.[/QUOTE]I understood the question fine. For the last time I put it could be bullcrap in the ORIGINAL POST, I saw the video fine but it was being reported by CNN. It was wrong because the vote cam out like less than 5 minutes later to the contrary - I really don't see the big issue?

It's like you've caught me with a secret email server of sticking a cigar up my assistants 'you know where'...

hominid · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:42

Colonel_Klinck said:
The only POTUS to ever have a member of his own party vote to convict.

Who happens to be one of the people that Trump is after for corruption.

Jono8 · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:42

JRS said:
Help me out here a bit. D'you remember her hair colour? Skin colour? Vaguely what she was wearing?

There's only 17 female Democrat senators, so it should be fairly easy for me to find the vid clip that you're on about.

It seems rather odd that a senator would announce to CNN publicly, and on video, that they were going to vote to acquit, as the case has not been made....and then vote guilty on both articles.

hominid · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:45

JRS said:
Help me out here a bit. D'you remember her hair colour? Skin colour? Vaguely what she was wearing?

Older than 50, white, I doin't remember the red but I'm watching the video you put up and now I'm not so sure...

JRS said:
There's only 17 female Democrat senators, so it should be fairly easy for me to find the vid clip that you're on about.

I'm still trying to look through my history, but today has been a very busy day!

Thanks for the effort though, much appreciated!

Jono8 · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:48

hominid said:
Ok, you got me - feel better?

No, because you still don't seem to believe you are in the wrong.

hominid said:
I understood the question fine.

You clearly didn't, because the question was asking if any of the Dems voted to acquit. An easily answered question that could be found in seconds on the internet.

Instead, you answered saying "I know" , when you didn't, and you had instead supposedly watched a video (from who knows when?) which supposedly had a Democratic Senator saying she would vote to acquit as the Dems had not made their case. Which you now conveniently cannot find.

A normal human being would have replied many posts ago and said "oh sorry, i got that wrong, no democrat senators voted to acquit. I must be mistaken"

hominid · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:49

Jono8 said:
It seems rather odd that a senator would announce to CNN publicly, and on video, that they were going to vote to acquit, as the case has not been made....and then vote guilty on both articles.

I didn't report it as solid truth, I stated it could be rubbish - which turned out to be so. It was less than half an hour before the vote.

I don't get the big deal, is it because you think you've finally caught me out on something, is it that important to you?

Jono8 · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:51

hominid said:
is it that important to you?

Not at all. I just find it entertaining when people on here try to jump through a never-ending amount of hoops to avoid having to put their hands up and say they were wrong about such an easily proven fact.

Jono8 · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:51

hominid said:
I didn't report it as solid truth, I stated it could be rubbish - which turned out to be so

So the video doesn't exist? Or did you mistake a republican for a democrat?

JRS · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:53

@hominid

That's Lisa Murkowski. Again, note the (R).

hominid · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:54

Jono8 said:
No, because you still don't seem to believe you are in the wrong.

Wow, you really have a comprehension problem.

How am I wrong when I reported it, straight from twitter, while saying it could be rubbish - which it turned out to be?

Jono8 said:
You clearly didn't, because the question was asking if any of the Dems voted to acquit. An easily answered question that could be found in seconds on the internet.

Again I watched the vote AS IT HAPPENED, I was well aware - thanks!

Jono8 said:
Instead, you answered saying "I know" , when you didn't, and you had instead supposedly watched a video (from who knows when?) which supposedly had a Democratic Senator saying she would vote to acquit as the Dems had not made their case. Which you now conveniently cannot find.

So, I've now tried to explain it many times to you, if you can't grasp the complexities of not being able to find a video on twitter on one of the craziest days for political news that I have seen then I can't help you.

Jono8 said:
A normal human being would have replied many posts ago and said "oh sorry, i got that wrong, no democrat senators voted to acquit. I must be mistaken"

I didn't get it wrong, I reported what I saw and I said AT THE TIME that it could be bullcrap - I don't get your malfunction.. :confused:

hominid · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:56

JRS said:
@hominid

That's Lisa Murkowski. Again, note the (R).

Again, thanks for the help chap! Still doesn't look like it, as I said the more I watch the first one the more it looks right but I just don't rmember all that red.. Not sure at all - sorry.

Jono8 · 5 Feb 2020 at 22:57

hominid said:
Wow, you really have a comprehension problem.

How am I wrong when I reported it, straight from twitter, while saying it could be rubbish - which it turned out to be?

Again I watched the vote AS IT HAPPENED, I was well aware - thanks!

..

What? So you watched the vote live and you were well aware that no Democrat voted to acquit, as soon as the vote was in....yet you still answered JRS's question with the following:

hominid said:
I know there was at least one, she told a reporter they didn't make a case - a woman. Could be lying though - I'll see if I can find it.

So...you knew you were lying and that no Democrat voted to acquit :confused:

If you knew the results of the vote, as it came in, the answer to JRS's question was "none of them".