Donald Trump

hominid · 7 Feb 2020 at 23:08

Greebo said:
So how can you claim on the one hand GD was a much nicer and friendlier place.

I used this thing called a browser, I use it to browse the internet. (that was not meant to sound nasty fyi - getting late)

Greebo said:
and now say you never posted in there or read the threads in there and stayed in the hardware threads?

I didn't say that. I said I came here for the information but I have looked about a bit in all honesty - still didn't see what the other poster was seeing, if I did I forgot years ago.

Greebo said:
Those threads are still just the same and full of helpful people and stuff.

There is a lot less need for technical information, for me, but I still do browse around from time to time. Although today was the first time in a years, iirc, that I went into SC - I forgot my flamesuit and got burned.

Greebo said:
I ignored all the right wing and racist stuff and spent my time posting in the technical threads. I was here to learn.

Same dude, same

Jono8 · 7 Feb 2020 at 23:11

hominid said:
It's getting to be more than obvious that I know a fair bit more than you ever will. I may even had a dump or two with more debating skills than you, and I'm sure they were more honest..

From the guy who got fooled by a right wing satire website, specifically designed to fool people like him :confused:

Its rather revealing that you now just have to resort to personal attacks and projection. If you can't actually reply succinctly and without personal attacks then i will just take it that you have nothing to actually use as a genuine retort.

I must say that the repeated quoting of every single sentence or group of words is a novel new take on the gish gallop.

[FnG]magnolia · 7 Feb 2020 at 23:13

hominid said:
I used this thing called a browser, I use it to browse the internet. (that was not meant to sound nasty fyi - getting late)

I didn't say that. I said I came here for the information but I have looked about a bit in all honesty - still didn't see what the other poster was seeing, if I did I forgot years ago.

There is a lot less need for technical information, for me, but I still do browse around from time to time. Although today was the first time in a years, iirc, that I went into SC - I forgot my flamesuit and got burned.

I ignored all the right wing and racist stuff and spent my time posting in the technical threads. I was here to learn.Same dude, same

Check yourself, don't wreck yourself my dude.

hominid · 7 Feb 2020 at 23:17

Jono8 said:
From the guy who got fooled by a right wing satire website, specifically designed to fool people like him

Wrong, someone else made the claim and I found the site.

Jono8 said:
Its rather revealing that you now just have to resort to personal attacks and projection.

Personal attacks, do you think I've been patient with you? You've spent DAYS attacking me, twisting my words, taking things out of context and out right lies - like the one above.

So, again, I've been patient - so far.

Jono8 said:
If you can't actually reply succinctly and without personal attacks then i will just take it that you have nothing to actually use as a genuine retort.

I thought it was rather funny.

Jono8 said:
I must say that the repeated quoting of every single sentence or group of words is a novel new take on the gish gallop.

I have to answer each of your points, but thanks!

hominid · 7 Feb 2020 at 23:18

[FnG]magnolia said:
Check yourself, don't wreck yourself my dude.

?? was it the mis-quote at the end, fixed - cheers!

Jono8 · 7 Feb 2020 at 23:24

hominid said:
Wrong, someone else made the claim and I found the site.

Your post:

hominid said:
I've read it before, ahh - found it: https://dailyworldupdate.us/supreme...up-to-3-years-if-hes-acquitted-in-the-senate/ I'm not sure either way - will need to look in to it.

So what were you saying, that a joke needs to be looked into? What were you not sure about?

We aren't stupid. We know you thought that was a genuine article that you had found.

Maybe, if you knew it was a satirical article (you didn't), you should have composed your post in a different manner.

hominid said:
Personal attacks, do you think I've been patient with you? You've spent DAYS attacking me, twisting my words, taking things out of context and out right lies - like the one above.

Incorrect. I have simply been correcting you and calling you out on the incorrect things you have posted.

Kyo · 8 Feb 2020 at 01:19

The plotters? Do you hear yourself. No wonder anyone with sense can't take you seriously. You need help.

timmeh · 8 Feb 2020 at 05:17

https://twitter.com/x/status/1225909811851780096

You know when you’ve been tangoed :cool:

The black and white version on that account looks like he’s wearing black face

jsmoke · 8 Feb 2020 at 05:22

timmeh said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1225909811851780096
You know when you’ve been tangoed

The black and white version on that account looks like he’s wearing black face

I assume that's fake tan?

Werewolf · 8 Feb 2020 at 05:41

jsmoke said:
I assume that's fake tan?

I think it's a "classic" bronzer of the type that went out of fashion about 30 years ago because it was so obvious and made you look like an idiot if you didn't get it right but looked quite good on the body builders who had muscle, or actors who got it done properly.

It doesn't look good when it appears to have been applied by a five year old or via a flan base.

Greebo · 8 Feb 2020 at 08:09

regulus said:
It's a TDS circle jerk in there.

You mean in here surely?

Greebo · 8 Feb 2020 at 08:12

tang0 said:
Great to see Trump has started taking out the coup plotters who tried to overthrow the government, with Vindmann and Sondland axed. Ciaramella, Misko, Atkinson & Holmes next hopefully

Like the quote.. If you shoot at the king, you best not miss

Seriously? A war hero who shed blood for his country who Trump isnt worthy to lick his shoes and his only crime was to tell the truth? You need to get help.

ianh · 8 Feb 2020 at 08:23

Greebo said:
Seriously? A war hero who shed blood for his country who Trump isnt worthy to lick his shoes and his only crime was to tell the truth? You need to get help.

Those people held a position of trust for the President and, after giving evidence against him, Trump has decided he can no longer trust them so they've been given other duties instead which is something any boss can/will do with members of staff that they lose trust in.

Neither groups have been sacked either, the two military guys will go back to other military jobs and the ambassador, as a civilian, will probably quit rather than take another role.

Zuma · 8 Feb 2020 at 08:36

tang0 said:
Great to see Trump has started taking out the coup plotters who tried to overthrow the government, with Vindmann and Sondland axed. Ciaramella, Misko, Atkinson & Holmes next hopefully

Like the quote.. If you shoot at the king, you best not miss

Are they all part of one big plot? It seems thats the only way it could have worked. All those witnesses must have worked out their stories together before the whistleblower kicked things off.

Dirk Diggler · 8 Feb 2020 at 08:54

String said:
I haven't followed any of this, it just seems incredibly bizarre. A man is tried by a load of people he has huge influence over, and the result is an expectation before the charge is even brought.

It makes no sense.

And now he's working through those who testified against him, sacking them. What kind of judicial process is that, is it any wonder they all toe the line and exonerate him? :confused:

Greebo · 8 Feb 2020 at 09:07

ianh said:
Those people held a position of trust for the President and, after giving evidence against him, Trump has decided he can no longer trust them so they've been given other duties instead which is something any boss can/will do with members of staff that they lose trust in.

Neither groups have been sacked either, the two military guys will go back to other military jobs and the ambassador, as a civilian, will probably quit rather than take another role.

they have been sacked from their current roles though. Okay they have been shipped off to other roles but it does seem like just petty revenge and more suited to a dictatorship. Never a good thing to surround yourself with “yes men” who are scared to say a word not in agreement with you.

Kyo · 8 Feb 2020 at 09:24

Zuma said:
Are they all part of one big plot? It seems thats the only way it could have worked. All those witnesses must have worked out their stories together before the whistleblower kicked things off.

According to Trump and @tang0 they planned this well before he even became President. So obviously they were all in it together plotting and waiting until the Ukraine call just to get him. It makes perfect sense if you absolutely have no grip in reality. Ridiculous!

String said:
And now he's working through those who testified against him, sacking them. What kind of judicial process is that, is it any wonder they all toe the line and exonerate him?

Is this American Justice? What does that tell the next person that meant to do the right thing? dont say anything else you will get punished. Is this a regime now not a democracy?

chroniclard · 8 Feb 2020 at 09:32

Nice to see the fat draft dodging coward punishing true patriots that dared tell the truth.

hominid · 8 Feb 2020 at 09:51

Jono8 said:
Your post:

I've read it before, ahh - found it: https://dailyworldupdate.us/supreme...up-to-3-years-if-hes-acquitted-in-the-senate/ I'm not sure either way - will need to look in to it.

Click to expand...

Jono8 said:
So what were you saying

No, what I say is what I said - you can't, or won't with good faith, interpret ANYTHING I say.

Jono8 said:
that a joke needs to be looked into?

I didn't look in to it yet, hence I didn't know, EITHER WAY, what it was... Again I recalled the story because someone else brought it up, so I found it - but I said I HADN'T checked it YET.

Jono8 said:
What were you not sure about?

If I see claims I need to check on them, as I said, and you quoted it, that I hadn't looked into it so I didn't know yet either way....

Jono8 said:
We aren't stupid.

I'm beginning to doubt you.

Jono8 said:
We know you thought that was a genuine article that you had found.

No, you just proved both my point AND that that you was wrong to bring it up.

Jono8 said:
Maybe, if you knew it was a satirical article (you didn't)

I admitted that, because, you know, I HADN'T CHECKED IT YET!!!! It's all in that quote you nit-picking ignoramus!

Jono8 said:
you should have composed your post in a different manner.

It was all clear, just you 'tried' to pick it apart - and failed MISERABLY.

Personal attacks, do you think I've been patient with you? You've spent DAYS attacking me, twisting my words, taking things out of context and out right lies - like the one above.

Jono8 said:
Incorrect.

Correct!

Jono8 said:
I have simply

You got that right!

Jono8 said:
been correcting you

I'd say trying and failing miserably.

Jono8 said:
and calling you out on the incorrect

I proved that you was WRONG in this assumption.

Jono8 said:
things you have posted.

I agree that you post on virtually everything I've posted, try to pick holes and fail time and time and time and time and time again!

Anything else I can help you with?

//poxy formatting..

hominid · 8 Feb 2020 at 09:59

tang0 said:
Great to see Trump has started taking out the coup plotters who tried to overthrow the government, with Vindmann and Sondland axed. Ciaramella, Misko, Atkinson & Holmes next hopefully

He's got a LOT more to route out yet, the fur is starting to fly..

tang0 said:
Like the quote.. If you shoot at the king, you best not miss

Very apt!