there's something fishy about Sturgeon and Salmond![]()
This did not get the recognition it deserves

there's something fishy about Sturgeon and Salmond![]()

Wasn't a former leader of the Conservative Party allegedly involved in Piggate?
Or, he's innocent...Salmond's been cleared of all changes, shock horror, establishment protected.
Do the Scottish just flip a coin when deciding to declare someone "not guilty" or "not proven"? I mean under the system of "innocent until proven guilty" they're essentially the same thing.
Do the Scottish just flip a coin when deciding to declare someone "not guilty" or "not proven"? I mean under the system of "innocent until proven guilty" they're essentially the same thing.
" … the difference between not proven and not guilty is not guilty is you believe there is evidence to prove that he is not guilty." ... "Not guilty is there is evidence to prove that he did not do what they were accused of. Guilty is there is evidence that tells you. Not proven tells you there is no evidence."
And people wonder why the Scots shouldn't govern themselves.
Anybody following this, it's not looking good so far for him. Not much of a leg to stand on and trying to make out that accusers weren't even at place where crimes apparently happened. Which is blatant lies.
I assume he's looking at prison if found guilty?
Salmond's been cleared of all changes, shock horror, establishment protected.
To a certain degree we’re actually lucky in Scotland as there is a requirement for corroboration, so he said/she said type cases can’t (or at least shouldn’t) get to court. There’s been a campaign though to remove this requirement of a minimum standard of evidence in recent years, apparently cases aren’t getting to court because there’s no evidence, which some people argue is a bad thing seemingly.Wow that sucks to be Scottish, so if some bitter ex-partner accuses you of something as revenge chances are the best verdict you could hope for would be "not proven" and people will think you did whatever she accused you of but that the police just cocked up the investigation for the rest of your life.
What are all these BS accusations against celebrities of which you speak so confidently?. . .
We've seen a load of these BS accusations and "investigations" against celebrities already. Some people will do anything for attention.
. . .
What are all these BS accusations against celebrities of which you speak so confidently?
Wow that sucks to be Scottish, so if some bitter ex-partner accuses you of something as revenge chances are the best verdict you could hope for would be "not proven" and people will think you did whatever she accused you of but that the police just cocked up the investigation for the rest of your life.
Remember the fantasist Carl Beech? He accused loads of people. Then there were Cliff Richard and Paul Gambacchini who were investigated to no prosecution.