- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
We'll be getting RT games a plenty when the new consoles arrive, so the next gen cards better be able to handle it.
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That is truly the worst case scenario isn't it. Similar to your sentiment is that I believe that the 2080ti under the RTX branding makes the RTX branding look bad. Do to those performance RT penalties and the inclusion of DLSS 1.0 (which initially made branding of RTX much worst). Did you know some try to downplay DLSS 2.0 as if there wasn't revision? IE: to make it look like it was just DLSS original all along?The problem as I see it is that, by bringing RT functionality so early and with such a heavy penalty to gamers, in both cost and the negative performance impact, nvidia could actually turn consumers off the idea of RT altogether.
It was so bad that nvidia also had to introduce dlss to mitigate the impact that RT had on framerates.
Hopefully the second coming will be much improved by both nvidia and amd.
Looks like Ampere is getting a Colossal spanking in the AI space.
As for computing output, the MK200 delivers 250 TFLOPs of peak FP16 (with Sparsity) and 62.5 TFLOPs (with Sparsity) of peak FP32 performance. The NVIDIA A100 GPU delivers a total of 312 TFLOPs of FP16 (624 TFLOPs with Sparsity) and 19.5 TFLOPs FP32 (156 TFLOPs with Sparsity).
Why on earth would Nvidia expect people to use a new power connector purely for their GPU cmon people wake upIt's confirmed fake.
Why on earth would Nvidia expect people to use a new power connector purely for their GPU cmon people wake up
Something not quite right with that article.
whoever told you that is lyingPicture on qled is supposed to be almost OLED like, with no burn-in or colours wearing out after a few years.
whoever told you that is lying![]()
Unless you play the same game over and over and over again, there's nothing to worry about.If you’re using a TV as a PC monitor, I’d only consider OLED if you can get some decent burn in insurance with it. Personally, I think a QLED is a better bet for PC use.
Said many a soon to be heartbroken OLED ownerUnless you play the same game over and over and over again, there's nothing to worry about.
Said many a soon to be heartbroken OLED owner
To be honest I would rather deal with burn-in issues than the lottery there is with TN, VA, and IPS panels in regards to backlight/glow problems because burn-in is something you yourself can actively mitigate through clever setup whereas backlight and glow issues are just there from the start.Said many a soon to be heartbroken OLED owner
+1To be honest I would rather deal with burn-in issues than the lottery there is with TN, VA, and IPS panels in regards to backlight/glow problems because burn-in is something you yourself can actively mitigate through clever setup whereas backlight and glow issues are just there from the start.
i have burn in on my tv cause a young family member left my console on when i wasn't here and let me tell you its bloody irritating to see and you always look at it no matter how hard you try not to. thankfully its a old tv and nothing fancy but yeah that is my experience with burn in.
its a old tv
How long was the console on for to cause that, I would have thought the auto power off on the TV would have prevented that?