• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Jon Peddie Research: NVIDIA reaches 80% discrete GPU market share

Soldato
Joined
6 Oct 2007
Posts
23,114
Location
North West
5500xt/5600xt did suck.

https://videocardz.com/press-release/jon-peddie-research-nvidia-reaches-80-discrete-gpu-market-share

8DeZ8w7.jpg
 
The 5600XT is a decent card, it's just poorly priced. If it'd been on par with the 1660S price-wise I think it'd have done well.

The 5500's always seemed a bit pointless though, you can get the RX580 and RX590 for less and there's little to no performance difference.
 
dGPU's, Intel?

oh... i see.... well why put Intel on there at all?

Yeah I was going to take the michael and post a grey chart one colour with same labels as its a horrific visual.

Would it even matter? People will just buy Nvidia regardless.

Lol. :) To some, even sampling this enthusiast forum it makes no difference "the drivers, heat.." oh how the flippening is nigh.
 
As has been said, AMD really need to start undercutting Nvidia more price wise if they want to claw back marketshare.

No point releasing stuff at similar price/perf to what has been out there for a year already with Nvidia.
 
Just shows how poor AMD are. People moaning about NVidia prices etc but can you blame NVidia when there is no competition? The last good GPU AMD released, was the 7970.
 
Just shows how poor AMD are. People moaning about NVidia prices etc but can you blame NVidia when there is no competition? The last good GPU AMD released, was the 7970.

:D It's AMD's fault not nvidias. Let's give them some hearty back slaps 'cos you know, never a bad word to say about nvidia.
 
I rather like the idea of what small ITX Powercolor 5600 XT. Hard to beat at 180mm, near the top of TPU's perf/watt chart, quiet, and performs between a RTX 2600 and RX5700.
Price might not be that great, so not high enough volume to take much marketshare.
The 5500 and 590 situation is stranger.
Can't help think that the Polaris port to 12nm was mismanaged. Why bother to port it and then overvolt and clock it so high and keep volumes low?
Clocked down to the speed of a 580, the 12nm version should have a pretty good uplift like Ryzen 1000 vs Ryzen 2000. Okay, so wouldn't command the same price but GF's 12nm must have been cheap by then.
Certainly the chasing of margins, aka the "we don't want to be known as the cheap brand" hasn't worked well.
Kind of ironic, AMD have the vast majority of consoles (Switch has some volume but do any developers even take it seriously), but almost no PC marketshare. And of course, while the console margins are low they have great volume. Since taping out costs a lot these days, it doesn't make sense to keep Navi expensive unless wafers are short.
 
Back
Top Bottom