• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Navi 23 ‘NVIDIA Killer’ GPU Rumored to Support Hardware Ray Tracing, Coming Next Year

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been saying the exact same thing. Although I didn't categorize the skus like that. There is no way Nvidia would price 3080 that low if AMD wasn't competing in the same space. You simply false hoping that Nvidia was simply being generous, which they are not.

If Navi 21 is $549 and GTX 3080 is $699, guess which one will be faster.
It's possible that the performance delta between RTX 3070 for $499 and RTX 3080 for $699 is not that high, or is around 10-15% which doesn't pay for the large price differentiation.
 
So what did you mean by your comment? It felt like you were baiting or belittling DLSS despite its clear advantages when putting into place complex raytracing.

I'd rather embrace and pay credit to good technologies and hope AMD implement them too, rather than be-little them.
"belittle DLSS"? Oh grow up. I'm not getting into this again because it just makes Nvidia fanboys froth at the mouth. You like DLSS? Good for you. Personally I'd prefer Nvidia and AMD produce GPUs that render native resolutions rather than upscaling. And if you actually and genuinely prefer an upscaled image over a native one then you need your head read.
 
If Navi 21 is $549 and GTX 3080 is $699, guess which one will be faster.
It's possible that the performance delta between RTX 3070 for $499 and RTX 3080 for $699 is not that high, or is around 10-15% which doesn't pay for the large price differentiation.
You didn't factor in the vram. Although 2GB delta is hardly anything. I still wouldn't consider either. It's also possible that the price factors in IC cost as well.
 
"belittle DLSS"? Oh grow up. I'm not getting into this again because it just makes Nvidia fanboys froth at the mouth. You like DLSS? Good for you. Personally I'd prefer Nvidia and AMD produce GPUs that render native resolutions rather than upscaling. And if you actually and genuinely prefer an upscaled image over a native one then you need your head read.

This. Also if you have to cheat via tricks, use a standardised method so all people can contribute, this proprietary bull is tiresome and not good for the scene (it generally takes nvidia a few years to be cajoled into towing the line) as all it does is **** off gamers like having to lock in to monitors etc.
 
This aligns to what most of us (who dont mind buying AMD hardware) have thought considering the low pricing from Jensen. If he had it in the bag like last gen the 3080 would be £200 more.
It depends how you look at it . The 3080 is now back to the price of the 1080 but the 3070 is more expensive than the 1070 so not that low and that's not taking into account the 3090 price.
 
It depends how you look at it . The 3080 is now back to the price of the 1080 but the 3070 is more expensive than the 1070 so not that low and that's not taking into account the 3090 price.

Good point. Whilst we dont want to see any tier go up in price, I am happier that the higher tiers are coming back into line.
 
Seriously though, think about it, if AMD are competing - its what people wanted. The fanboys retorted "well its AMDs fault as they dont compete". Even though this is for their selfish reasons and will buy nvidia anyway, the regular gamers will benefit from choice in both brands and a bit less £££'s for an upgrade!
 
Seriously though, think about it, if AMD are competing - its what people wanted. The fanboys retorted "well its AMDs fault as they dont compete". Even though this is for their selfish reasons and will buy nvidia anyway, the regular gamers will benefit from choice in both brands and a bit less £££'s for an upgrade!

Yup they are finally getting competition to buy Nvidia at a cheaper price. Too bad nvidia factored in less vram as a "quick and dirty" way to keep those prices down. :D

They can never win can they? I wonder what the new excuse will be once those reviews come in with these new games where there is a marked performance penalty for having less vram? I know..."If AMD hadda launch when Nvidia did I wouldn't have bought this". Watch and see...
 
It's possible that the performance delta between RTX 3070 for $499 and RTX 3080 for $699 is not that high, or is around 10-15% which doesn't pay for the large price differentiation.
Are you kidding. Have you looked at the differences in specs between them? 50% more cores, GDDR6X Vs GDDR6 memory, 50% higher Tflops, 50% higher memory bandwidth........
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom