• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Navi 23 ‘NVIDIA Killer’ GPU Rumored to Support Hardware Ray Tracing, Coming Next Year

Status
Not open for further replies.

lol... this guy's a complete pee taker.

leUIZsC.png
 
Every pre-release hype in recent memory has been Raja spinning bullcrap and outright lying. That hack is gone now. So lack of tangible leaks is very much a good thing.

What information did Nvidia give about Ampere before their launch? None. Everything we knew, or thought we knew, came from leaks, rumours and assumptions. Why then do you expect AMD to play by a different rulebook?

Its simply because people want information as they have all nvidia's info now (impatient). Not sure why as unless you have the intention of buying whats the point right? Might actually win over some mindshare this bad launch and delayed stock. I have to hold back as reasons (mods) :p
 
just saw review of 3090 rtx and its barely 13% faster than 3080 and I really think AMD if they deliver performance can give mr leather jacket man a Good slap.

but NVIDIA botched the 3080 with only 10GB ram goofed it.

AMD doubt mess it up, clear window for them.
 
The NVidia launch was a rush release, that much is obvious, in production from August (could have been halfway through August for all we know) and a reveal on Sept 1st. AMD seem to be biding their time building up inventory for a release with decent volume.
 
These folks from corporate marketing (though looks like he has a more fancy title ) can lie through their teeth..Rajah, on the other hand, had a warped sense of reality :D

Overall though there seems to be a very good chance of AMD upsetting nVidia.

Edit: holding out for the 80 CU.. but would have preferred a 160 CU MCM, hope that goes
 
Last edited:
Seems a bit knee-jerk deciding to go with AMD because of the past week. As **** as the situation is, I'd sooner wait for the better features, drivers and performance that Nvidia offers.

They'll obviously be in a better position to meet the demand as there isn't a much demand, plain and simply. They also come across as a bit cringy in those twitter exchanges, like a vulture picking at scraps. If they were confident they would be releasing actual information about their product.

I have a 3900x, so I'm not exactly anti-AMD - they make excellent CPUs.
 
, I'd sooner wait for the better features, drivers and performance that Nvidia offers.


Oh so you already know the performance of the 6000 series? Feel free to clue us in. Their only real feature over amd currently is dlss, and that barely has a large catalogue of games supporting it. As for drivers, that experience varies person to person.
 
just saw review of 3090 rtx and its barely 13% faster than 3080 and I really think AMD if they deliver performance can give mr leather jacket man a Good slap.

but NVIDIA botched the 3080 with only 10GB ram goofed it.

AMD doubt mess it up, clear window for them.

This is why a lot of Nvidia fans are hoping AMD can't beat the 3080, because if they do, even just by 5% they are already getting too close to the 3090 for comfort.
 
And the 3080 drivers are looking dodgy already. It's been a full 'classic' AMD launch from Nvidia.


Yup, nvidia had a rush release with no stock, people were flipping out at AMD for having their event in late October, now they're flipping out at nvidia for a pathetic half assed paper launch. Nvidia were in production for only a few weeks before launching, they probably have managed a few thousand cards tops worldwide.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom