• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

My new Intel 11900K @5500Mhz vs. old Intel 8700K @5300Mhz CPU performance test

torwak

torwak

torwak

Associate
Joined
28 Oct 2013
Posts
82
3D Mark Time Spy CPU comparison [email protected] vs. 8700K@5.3GHz -> ~58% faster.

sR08gPx.png


CPUZ - 11900K@5500Mhz Single/Multithread
KbZ2rac.png


CPUZ - 8700K@5300Mhz Single/Multithread
FU6ceqh.png


Aida64 Memory latency test: (Gear1 / 1:1 / 3733Mhz with budget RAM sticks)
DPdNUmP.jpg


Cinebench 20 test:
kswNSrI.png


Geekbench 5 test:
0E42pcy.jpg


CoreTemp:
gDUf9WC.png


 
Last edited:
torwak said:
3D Mark Time Spy CPU comparison [email protected] vs. 8700K@5.3GHz -> ~58% faster.

sR08gPx.png


CPUZ - 11900K@5500Mhz Single/Multithread
KbZ2rac.png


CPUZ - 8700K@5300Mhz Single/Multithread
FU6ceqh.png


Aida64 Memory latency test: (Gear1 / 1:1 / 3733Mhz with budget RAM sticks)
WaOK0zj.png


Cinebench 20 test:
kswNSrI.png


Geekbench 5 test:
0E42pcy.jpg


CoreTemp:
gDUf9WC.png

Click to expand...
Thats a big boost, and single thread hammers my last gen, multi thread not so due to two less cores?
@5.2ghz
qISOquU.png
 
turbot1984 said:
Thats a big boost, and single thread hammers my last gen, multi thread not so due to two less cores?
@5.2ghz
qISOquU.png
Click to expand...

11900K has 8 cores and 10850K has 10 cores. If 11900K had 10 cores it would hit 9062 points in this scenario.

Moreover my 8700K@5300Mhz also surpasses your 10850K@5200Mhz at single core score which indicates there was no IPC increase from 8 gen to 10gen from Intel basically.
 
I'd be interested to see his R23 scores without turning off the full 10 minutes default setting.
 
humbug said:
I'd be interested to see his R23 scores without turning off the full 10 minutes default setting.
Click to expand...

I would do that only if I take my radiators to balcony at winter night. Otherwise any torture test will may cause degradation at the silicon quality becasue of the inefficient cooling.

I have bought this CPU for gaming especially for the low memory latency that AMD can't achieve. Not for rendering farm.
 
chroniclard said:
Which games benefit from the "low memory latency"?
Click to expand...

Basically all games. Latency directly affects frame times for any game with a core data set larger than the CPU's cache system can hold - any object that needs to be checked for render calls and any object affected by player actions, physics or AI needs to be loaded from RAM with every single frame drawn, and every single of these actions will have the CPU waiting on the RAM for the duration.
 
torwak said:
Basically all games. Latency directly affects frame times for any game with a core data set larger than the CPU's cache system can hold - any object that needs to be checked for render calls and any object affected by player actions, physics or AI needs to be loaded from RAM with every single frame drawn, and every single of these actions will have the CPU waiting on the RAM for the duration.
Click to expand...

I see, seems a bit an invalid reason though as Ryzen is competitive in basically all games regardless of this low latency memory. :)
 
torwak said:
I would do that only if I take my radiators to balcony at winter night. Otherwise any torture test will may cause degradation at the silicon quality becasue of the inefficient cooling.

I have bought this CPU for gaming especially for the low memory latency that AMD can't achieve. Not for rendering farm.
Click to expand...

Bucket full of ice :D
 
BTW its not the memory latency that's the thing with that, its actually the intercore latency, and with that AMD on Zen 3 at least is better. Despite Intel's "Ring Bus" Its old hat now, AMD are using physical signal accelerators.

HPgAaA9.png


Memory Latency Zen 3 and Coffee Lake are about even.

njr1fM6.png
 
humbug said:
BTW its not the memory latency that's the thing with that, its actually the intercore latency, and with that AMD on Zen 3 at least is better. Despite Intel's "Ring Bus" Its old hat now, AMD are using physical signal accelerators.
Click to expand...

I have never referred to the intercore latency. It's a complete disaster for AMD either. :)
 
torwak said:
I have never referred to the intercore latency. It's a complete disaster for AMD either. :)
Click to expand...
You're talking about how "Latency" affects AMD in gaming, that's true, for Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000 Series) AMD fixed that for Zen 3 (Ryzen 5000)

The Latency that effects Zen 2 in games is the "Intercore Latency" with the improvements AMD have made with Zen 3 that Latency is now better than Intel's.
 
humbug said:
You're talking about how "Latency" affects AMD in gaming, that's true, for Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000 Series) AMD fixed that for Zen 3 (Ryzen 5000)
Click to expand...

Yes, definetely AMD did fantastic job at ZEN3 arch comparing to ZEN2. However, they are still behind Intel in this perspective. Below 5950x with 3800Mhz Ram 16-18-18-38 "CR1". My score is even at CR2.

ab4urc3s48061.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom