2 in January. wow really hurt the Israelis didnt it. Shame it wasn't 200,000 as that is what Israel deserves.
The anti Israel = anti semitism agenda
- Thread starter NVP
- Start date
- Status
2 in January. wow really hurt the Israelis didnt it. Shame it wasn't 200,000 as that is what Israel deserves.
Exactly.
Just so everyone is clear, can you refer to this map...
... And say whether it's white or green you're talking about when you say, "wanting destruction of a state"?
I notice you didn't cite the source for that highly partisan document.
There's plenty of critiques of the dishonesty employed in it, I've chosen a religiously neutral analysis from a third party.
https://www.pfmep.org/misleading-and-harmful/
Its terrorism and its a war crime most likely given they are blindly firing them into civilian populations.
Now if they were firing them at an advancing Israeli military, I could see the defense argument. But firing them blindly into cities, get lost its nothing but terrorism.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,406
Genuine question - Have they got a more accurate depiction?
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 10,133
- Location
- newcastle
Wait a minute you have been saying this whole time that Israel’s response to the rocket attacks isn’t proportional to what Israel is throwing back, yet because you have lost the argument now you’re now saying it should have been 200,000 rockets, well done sir for showing your true colours
Given that mandatory Palestine wasn't segregated along religious lines, it's kind of hard to.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_Palestine
How did I lose the argument? Because a few dozen random rockets were fired in 18 odd months?
How many palestinians did Israel kick out there house and steal there land? How many did they murder? Do I need to mention the apartheid policies, the blatant discrimination against palestinians?
There is nothing wrong in defending yourself, it's those who side with the bullies who should be ashamed.
So to draw the parallel, if France decided to annex Jersey and Guernsey, it would be ok for the UK to start bombing Paris?
Yup, doesn't matter what there faith only matters what they do.
Which side are we talking about here ?
Well if they outnumbered us militarily and we could not attack there armed forces, then why not?
Would you stick your ass up in the air with a french baguette popping out of it?
Both, but im just wondering how these hamas apologists can justify firing off rockets blindly into civilian populations. Its ludicrous to be honest.
You really are a piece of work lol. Its good to see you can justify murdering civilians. Carry on.
Some idiots in the UK riding round spouting hateful racism whilst running away from anyone who challenges them, leaving their number plates in full view? Terrible. Full condemnation.
It’s not exactly minimising it to point out they didn’t just missile attack and kill 50 kids which is what this threads current discussion is about.
I think it’s more probably that you view racist words against Jewish people as more offensive than Arabs dying and can’t understand other people who focus on, you know, the killing of children. If we were to trade places in terms of baseless accusations I guess I could go further and say you obviously don’t see Palestinians as people, sub human, and care more about the mean words said about Jews.
argumentum ad passiones. You are substituting emotional appeal for objective evaluation.
I absolutely condemn the impact of the conflict on the civilian population. I simply recognise who is responsible for involving them in the conflict through using them as human shields.
Israel is no saintly state, but they are not responsible for dragging civilians into the conflict on this occasion.
You're right it can be said for both
I would assume the same way as IDF destroying buildings with people in them, then giving them a warning not knowing if they got out.
*justify murdering civilians. Carry on.* again it can be said for both
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,406
They bombed a refugee camp that killed 10 people, mostly children.
How is that Hamas fault? Were they using refugees as human shields?
The justify comment was aimed at B&W as he seems to think attacking a civilian population just because youre outgunned in every way is valid. Lets be blunt, it is not.
But yes youre right it goes both ways. I dont condone anything Israel has done, lets be clear on that, but it still in no way justifies attacks, from either side, on civs.
- Status