Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2012
- Posts
- 8,353
Sell your valuable home and move somewhere cheaper.
so both old and young end up competing to buy the same properties?
not sure that's gonna work.....
Sell your valuable home and move somewhere cheaper.
I doubt the old have the same requirements tbh.so both old and young end up competing to buy the same properties?
not sure that's gonna work.....
You have been living here for the past decade, right? Y'know, where it's been stable (pre-covid) and yet we've had the sustained slowest rate of growth in the past 50+ years.
The centre of British politics is utterly anti-cannabis.I am surprised that there still has been no talk, as far as i am aware, to legalize Cannabis in the UK. Surely getting it legalised, regulated and taxed then surely that would bring an influx of much needed cash directed towards the NHS. Maybe not all that is needed but would be a start.
But, they've been massively rewarded for the huge growth in value. Why shouldn't some of that pay forward to future generations who suffer as a result?
Is that why the deficit grew every year?But that growth was affordable in comparison to Labour buying unstainable investment in the public sector just to pay more people to have unnecessary jobs.
Is that why the deficit grew every year?
We can certainly ensure there's at least some generational fairness by not designing taxes to only take from younger people (like NI does). Especially when those taxes are to pay for old-people services.You can't raid people who've made wise investments otherwise we'll end up like a banana republic that no one wishes to invest in.
Usually after a negative shock, you see rapid growth in recovery. The Tories instead have held growth down with austerity, whilst failing anyway to control the deficit.Don't forget the Tories inherited an economy in a terrible state of affairs from Labour, their mess didn't get wiped clean with a change of government.
We can certainly ensure there's at least some generational fairness by not designing taxes to only take from younger people (like NI does). Especially when those taxes are to pay for old-people services.
Unless you're a government propped up by the old, I suppose. In which case you lean all your decisions toward favouring the retired. As per thread topic.
People younger than the old who are benefitting.It doesn't just take from younger people, it takes from all those of working age and more so from those earning more.
Usually after a negative shock, you see rapid growth in recovery. The Tories instead have held growth down with austerity, whilst failing anyway to control the deficit.
They've been abjectly terrible for the economy, make no mistake
People younger than the old who are benefitting.
And to take anything at all from minimum wage workers, and those similarly low paid, who are earning below 'living wage' is unconscionable frankly.
How about no!
They've had a decade and still failed to bring growth and deficit reduction. A decade!That just goes to show how bad the deficit was / is and they couldn't continue to spend on fake jobs like Labour would by swelling the size of the state / public sector.
Yes. They're taxing those people whilst not increasing taxes on the 1 in 5 millionaire retired households.The minimum wage that the Tories have increased several times you mean?
Excellent argument. Well constructed. Bravo.
They've had a decade and still failed to bring growth and deficit reduction. A decade!
The US suffered as well, worse. But they've grown way faster thanks to not pursuing austerity. The Tories have ****** us all.