They are stupid. It will happen with their will or without their will
Worldometer - real time world statistics (worldometers.info)
Greta Thunberg
- Thread starter rubberduck
- Start date
-
- Tags
- doom goblin
They are stupid. It will happen with their will or without their will
Worldometer - real time world statistics (worldometers.info)
Caporegime
Bloody hell, she can smile. Never thought I’d see the day.
What the Cop26 climate summit in Glasgow could achieve (msn.com)
"The Cop26 summit in Glasgow is being billed as the biggest UN climate conference since countries secured the Paris Agreement at talks in the French capital in 2015.
However, there is no big new deal like the Paris Agreement to agree at Cop26 – instead Glasgow has to deliver on the promises made six years ago and, alongside the formal UN negotiations, drive action to tackle the worsening climate crisis.
Here are some of the key areas where action is needed and where momentum and new commitments could help Glasgow be seen as a success:
– Keeping 1.5C within reach
Glasgow has been billed as the last best chance to limit global warming to 1.5C in the long term.
Under the Paris Agreement, countries committed to curbing temperature rises to “well below” 2C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5C – beyond which worsening impacts of climate change will be felt.
But, back in 2015, it was clear the emissions cuts countries had signed up to left the world far off track to meet the global temperature goals so, under the Paris deal, countries were due to bring forward more ambitious post-2020 national plans ahead of Cop26.
Even with new plans many countries have brought forward, the world is nowhere near on track for the 1.5C target, and there are concerns that some countries might turn their attention to post-2030 action, when much more efforts are needed within the next 10 years.
So UK officials want to see countries addressing how to close the gap between ambition and action required up to 2030, as part of the negotiated text that it is hoped will be secured by the end of the two weeks of talks.
– Cash
The key to success at Cop26 is delivering on a long-promised 100 billion dollars (£72 billion) a year for 2020 to 2025 for poorer countries to develop cleanly and cope with the impacts of climate change.
It is seen as a matter of trust between developing and developed nations for donor countries to deliver on the promised private and public climate finance, and conversations will also begin on unlocking further funds after 2025.
There is pressure for finance to be split equally between efforts to cut emissions and to adapt to climate change, and also pressure to address demands on support for loss and damage caused by extreme weather and rising seas.
– Coal
Coal is the dirtiest fossil fuel, and polluting coal plants need to be phased out in the next two decades to meet climate goals, according to the International Energy Agency.
The UK wants to see more momentum on ending the use of coal, and is urging developed countries and regions to commit to phasing it out by 2030, or by 2040 in the case of developing nations, and for commitments to no new plants.
– Cars
Road transport accounts for a tenth of global emissions, so countries are being urged to commit to ensuring all new car and van sales are zero emission vehicles by 2035 or 2040 and put in place policies to boost uptake.
Vehicle manufacturers are also being urged to commit to selling only zero emissions vehicles by 2035 or earlier.
– Trees
Healthy and restored forests can absorb and lock up vast amounts of carbon from the atmosphere, and protecting trees – along with other carbon-storing natural habitats such as peatlands – is seen as key to cutting emissions and helping communities and wildlife cope with climate change.
The pressure is on countries to take steps to halt and reverse deforestation, switch to sustainable agriculture and support efforts to protect or conserve 30% of the world’s land and oceans by 2030.
– Methane
While the most significant greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide, methane – from sources including livestock, agriculture such as rice production and fossil fuel extraction – is a powerful, but short-lived climate-warming gas.
Cutting emissions of methane is seen as a key way to curb warming in the short-term.
A US and EU-led “global methane pledge” which commits countries to cut their emissions of the gas by 30% by 2030 has already garnered a number of signatures ahead of its formal launch at Cop26, where it is hoped more will sign up.
– The Paris rulebook
Back in the negotiations, there are still some outstanding issues about how bits of the Paris Agreement are going to work, and they need to be sorted out to make it operational and effective.
There are three issues: transparency, Article 6, and common timeframes, and negotiating them will be key to Cop26.
A transparency regime would see UN-run assessments of what countries are doing on climate, but all countries need to agree to face these reviews.
Countries are meant to submit updated climate plans – or NDCs – every five years under the Paris Agreement, but there is no coherence on how long a period those plans cover.
Agreeing common timeframes will make it clearer who is doing what and help comparisons.
And then there is Article 6: the part of the Paris Agreement which covers carbon markets.
Finalising the rules on how these markets work would allow countries to buy carbon credits that fund new clean projects or protect and restore forests to cover their emissions as part of climate action."
"The Cop26 summit in Glasgow is being billed as the biggest UN climate conference since countries secured the Paris Agreement at talks in the French capital in 2015.
However, there is no big new deal like the Paris Agreement to agree at Cop26 – instead Glasgow has to deliver on the promises made six years ago and, alongside the formal UN negotiations, drive action to tackle the worsening climate crisis.
Here are some of the key areas where action is needed and where momentum and new commitments could help Glasgow be seen as a success:
– Keeping 1.5C within reach
Glasgow has been billed as the last best chance to limit global warming to 1.5C in the long term.
Under the Paris Agreement, countries committed to curbing temperature rises to “well below” 2C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5C – beyond which worsening impacts of climate change will be felt.
But, back in 2015, it was clear the emissions cuts countries had signed up to left the world far off track to meet the global temperature goals so, under the Paris deal, countries were due to bring forward more ambitious post-2020 national plans ahead of Cop26.
Even with new plans many countries have brought forward, the world is nowhere near on track for the 1.5C target, and there are concerns that some countries might turn their attention to post-2030 action, when much more efforts are needed within the next 10 years.
So UK officials want to see countries addressing how to close the gap between ambition and action required up to 2030, as part of the negotiated text that it is hoped will be secured by the end of the two weeks of talks.
– Cash
The key to success at Cop26 is delivering on a long-promised 100 billion dollars (£72 billion) a year for 2020 to 2025 for poorer countries to develop cleanly and cope with the impacts of climate change.
It is seen as a matter of trust between developing and developed nations for donor countries to deliver on the promised private and public climate finance, and conversations will also begin on unlocking further funds after 2025.
There is pressure for finance to be split equally between efforts to cut emissions and to adapt to climate change, and also pressure to address demands on support for loss and damage caused by extreme weather and rising seas.
– Coal
Coal is the dirtiest fossil fuel, and polluting coal plants need to be phased out in the next two decades to meet climate goals, according to the International Energy Agency.
The UK wants to see more momentum on ending the use of coal, and is urging developed countries and regions to commit to phasing it out by 2030, or by 2040 in the case of developing nations, and for commitments to no new plants.
– Cars
Road transport accounts for a tenth of global emissions, so countries are being urged to commit to ensuring all new car and van sales are zero emission vehicles by 2035 or 2040 and put in place policies to boost uptake.
Vehicle manufacturers are also being urged to commit to selling only zero emissions vehicles by 2035 or earlier.
– Trees
Healthy and restored forests can absorb and lock up vast amounts of carbon from the atmosphere, and protecting trees – along with other carbon-storing natural habitats such as peatlands – is seen as key to cutting emissions and helping communities and wildlife cope with climate change.
The pressure is on countries to take steps to halt and reverse deforestation, switch to sustainable agriculture and support efforts to protect or conserve 30% of the world’s land and oceans by 2030.
– Methane
While the most significant greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide, methane – from sources including livestock, agriculture such as rice production and fossil fuel extraction – is a powerful, but short-lived climate-warming gas.
Cutting emissions of methane is seen as a key way to curb warming in the short-term.
A US and EU-led “global methane pledge” which commits countries to cut their emissions of the gas by 30% by 2030 has already garnered a number of signatures ahead of its formal launch at Cop26, where it is hoped more will sign up.
– The Paris rulebook
Back in the negotiations, there are still some outstanding issues about how bits of the Paris Agreement are going to work, and they need to be sorted out to make it operational and effective.
There are three issues: transparency, Article 6, and common timeframes, and negotiating them will be key to Cop26.
A transparency regime would see UN-run assessments of what countries are doing on climate, but all countries need to agree to face these reviews.
Countries are meant to submit updated climate plans – or NDCs – every five years under the Paris Agreement, but there is no coherence on how long a period those plans cover.
Agreeing common timeframes will make it clearer who is doing what and help comparisons.
And then there is Article 6: the part of the Paris Agreement which covers carbon markets.
Finalising the rules on how these markets work would allow countries to buy carbon credits that fund new clean projects or protect and restore forests to cover their emissions as part of climate action."
Permabanned
I'm afraid after the gift from China and eighteen months of people wondering if they'll see their next birthday they aren't in the mood right now for turning the heating and lights off and putting on their thermals indoors. I would imagine many people would like to tell Greta, the UN and the hypocritical Insulate Britain mob to do one. So this shebang is a total waste of time and money and naive wishful thinking.
Who has said people have to turn the heating and lights off?
Also have a read of this people absolutely support this, its only a minority like yourself who think it is a waste of time.
Soldato
[
]
they had tugenhadt on r4 this morning saying that today's ulez zone expansion was mainly helping poor people who were the most likely to be impacted by pollution, as opposed to they now had to spend more money getting to work vs exercising,getting out of london,diet ...
(yes they might live closer to main throughfairs ... but even so)
you just put your lips together ..... Disney+ has been advertising her film as a motivation to sign up for them, maybe the kids would like it for xmas.
]
little option with the energy prices -
they had tugenhadt on r4 this morning saying that today's ulez zone expansion was mainly helping poor people who were the most likely to be impacted by pollution, as opposed to they now had to spend more money getting to work vs exercising,getting out of london,diet ...
(yes they might live closer to main throughfairs ... but even so)
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 28,889
Googled that, doesn't appear to be true.
She was awarded $1 million for her charity work and gave it to sustainability charities.
Soldato
And who do you think gets most of the cash??
Look at all these charity bosses and you will find the are paid big bucks.
And don't forget the tax breaks for giving cash to a charity
It's all about the money.
They went about this all the wrong way. They should gone down the reduce pollution route. Something everyone can agree on. CO2 production would have come down as a consequence. Sadly I think the good intentions got hijacked by vested interests. You can always rely on big money to corrupt anything (people) it touches!
Soldato
Is there much excess from nuclear? But i'm sure you could if there was a need for it. Although i'm sure the waste from renewables is a lot easier to deal with than nuclear.
But my point was mainly to do with taking the typical peak/trough output of renewables (mostly wind and solar, as used in the UK) and making it a constant to the point where it could possibly be used as the primary source of power generation for a country.
So dirty! Meh!"Levels of climate-heating gases in the atmosphere hit record levels in 2020, despite coronavirus-related lockdowns, the UN’s World Meteorological Organization has announced."
Climate crisis: greenhouse gas levels hit new record, UN reports (msn.com)
We could do with some more hydroelectric, that is essentially a big battery. Use the excess electricity to pump the water uphill and then release it when you need it to drive the turbines and generate electricity.
Soldato
Dinorwig-esque?
Definitely and i think there was talk of building something similar in Scotland but it seemed the UK doesn't really have the geography to build enough of them to cater for all of UK's renewables.
Yes that is an issue, takes up space and you need that change in elevation to work. I can't see any industrial scale batteries becoming operational for decades yet. I'm sure it will happen but this rush to 2030 is going to cause issues.
Soldato
I think this year has been a watermark year for renewables as we've seen what happens when you rely on mother nature to meet our energy needs. Still though I can't see this being enough for us to significantly change tactics and focus on more reliable and proven methods of electrical generation.
Decades? They're here now.
https://electrek.co/2021/09/07/tesla-megapack-giant-project-under-construction-uk/