Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
So do we have the facility to shoot down/take out nuclear arms that make their way towards UK soil, if such an event were to happen?

Not really unfortunately it is an annoying gap in our capabilities we've been far too complacent about. The Type 45s have some ability but it is limited.
 
Looks like Putin has achieved his objective with some of the responses on here with the nuclear threat its a desperate move the war is not going has he planned the Russian army is being shown up to be a bit crap and he did not expect western unity.
You don’t threaten nuclear war from a position of strength
 
To be honest, given the state of Russian military equipment we've seen, I don't put much weight behind how many actual ready to launch nukes the Russians have. I don't buy the whole "Russia has only sent in the bad gear to save the good stuff". Given how much egg he's got on his face he would have deployed his 10 good tanks and his 3 generation 5 fighters by now.

Putting is ALL FACE as it's now been proven.
 
So do we have the facility to shoot down/take out nuclear arms that make their way towards UK soil, if such an event were to happen?

I think countries would remain discrete on those capabilities if they exist, that's what I'd think anyway
 
It quite clearly suggests it is possible the UK could not react in time. There is no time limit. It is irrelevant. The nuclear deterrent works because a counterstrike is always possible with near 100% certainty. It also doesn't rely on other NATO members.

MAD requires that to be the case.
You need to read the rest of the paragraph you're quoting, not just stop at the first sentence. You're making the same point I was.
 
You need to read the rest of the paragraph you're quoting, not just stop at the first sentence. You're saying the same thing I was.

No you are trying to use your last bit as a get out.

The entire bullet point is nonsense.

"and whatever is left" doesn't make up for it. Everything is left, that is how the deterrent works, the ability to strike back is not affected at all and doesnt rely on others like you suggest.

In fact this saga may push the likes of Germany to finally build nuclear weapons, as they dont have the same level of safety like the UK and France.
 
To be honest, given the state of Russian military equipment we've seen, I don't put much weight behind how many actual ready to launch nukes the Russians have. I don't buy the whole "Russia has only sent in the bad gear to save the good stuff". Given how much egg he's got on his face he would have deployed his 10 good tanks and his 3 generation 5 fighters by now.

Putting is ALL FACE as it's now been proven.

The joy of corruption as a means of sustaining 'face' and power. Just because your cronies tell you all's well doesn't mean they spent the cash on what you told them to and to the effect desired.
 
UK used to have Patriot? defense missles, the newest system we have
is Sky Sabre.

I don't think we ever operated Patriot. Sky Sabre is the replacement for Rapier as far as I know, and is more of a point/local air defence system. I could be wrong but I don't think it has any ABM capabilities.
 
To be honest, given the state of Russian military equipment we've seen, I don't put much weight behind how many actual ready to launch nukes the Russians have. I don't buy the whole "Russia has only sent in the bad gear to save the good stuff". Given how much egg he's got on his face he would have deployed his 10 good tanks and his 3 generation 5 fighters by now.
Russia have already lost over 15% of the tanks they had positioned near the border for the invasion, if Ukraine can keep this up it may not even be a question of can they hold but a question of can they win.
 
I don't think we ever operated Patriot. Sky Sabre is the replacement for Rapier as far as I know, and is more of a point/local air defence system. I could be wrong but I don't think it has any ABM capabilities.

It is far too short range to have any useful capability vs ICBMs and/or their reentry vehicles.
 
To be honest, given the state of Russian military equipment we've seen, I don't put much weight behind how many actual ready to launch nukes the Russians have. I don't buy the whole "Russia has only sent in the bad gear to save the good stuff". Given how much egg he's got on his face he would have deployed his 10 good tanks and his 3 generation 5 fighters by now.

Putting is ALL FACE as it's now been proven.


I dont think that is the case, i think the world coming together and everyone doing what they can with sanctions and no fly zones for Russia are having a massive effect and I dont think Putin expected this much.
Also the Ukrainians have done an amazing job in resisting so far and made this a real fight rather than a walk in the park for Russia....but Putin simply hasn't brought in the heavy gear. I dont think he wanted to use it and i'm still hoping he wont.

 
Not so far as I am aware.

There has been talk about using the PAAMS system on the Type 45 destroyers for ABM defence but to my knowledge it hasn't been upgraded yet.

As far as I know we rely on deterrence via Trident instead.

It already exists as a ground based system:
https://www.army-technology.com/projects/aster-30/

The enhanced Aster 30 missiles are still being developed for BMD.
 
This whole situation makes me wonder again what the US was doing couple of weeks back when they pulled something out of Germany, from the airbase nuclear weapons are stored at, under heavy escort with heavy NATO AWACS/ISR missions in the region.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom