The water companies have all made good progress in regards leaks. For the wrong reasons, but they have made progress none the less.
The right reasons would be that leaking water is wasteful, but thats not why they have done it.
They have done it since their ability to put up prices is capped, by fixing leaks they lower their running costs (less water to pump and treat, no need for increased capacity etc), and hence increase profits.
The water system just like most other ex nationalised systems in the UK suffers from a historic vast underinvestment, again like most left relying on mainly victorian systems.
Its my biggest consideration when people talk of nationalisation (I am generally pro this for these sectors) in that you then in effect risk government taking the short term position yet again, to not invest in these infrastructure areas since they will not see the benefit within that parliamentary term.
Now the water companies aren't that much better but the people at the top are generally more capable than the likes of Patel or Grayling who you would risk turning into the decision makers.
It's not that simple I agree. But surely a lot of the increase in costs is pretty well covered by the population density. a lot of the time things are more expensive in London just because *shrug*. I also don't think the salary difference is what it used to be, certainly doesn't make a dent after you take into account the increased living costs.It costs FAR more to dig up a road in London than say newcastle.
Showering/bathing everyday is a relatively modern idea and considered unnecessary and even detrimental by a lot of health experts.A new meaning of the “the great unwashed”![]()
Privatised in a market with zero competition, basically a license to print money.Yeah, you're not wrong. The amount of leaks is crazy and the time to fix.
Privatised though, all about the profits.
I think a lot of people find them cheaper initially as you are naturally more worries about usage a bit like when you first get a smart meter and the challenge to get the usage down in slightly fun then after awhileIt's not that simple I agree. But surely a lot of the increase in costs is pretty well covered by the population density. a lot of the time things are more expensive in London just because *shrug*. I also don't think the salary difference is what it used to be, certainly doesn't make a dent after you take into account the increased living costs.
We've switched to a water meter in our new house. Girlfriend was panicking it was going to costs loads more but it seems ok so far I think. But we're very careful about usage.
Are the costs that people are quoting for their water meter usage including the standard water piping and sewage management costs that are automatically included in the water rates? Cause i was offered a water meter and when i ran the numbers it wasnt worth me getting the meter!
Turn your supply off on your incoming water feed then look at your meter which should have stopped. If not you potentially have a leak somewhere between the meter and your stop ****.Try to hold off getting a meter as long as you can. I'm paying £80 a month, double that of my neighbours. Despite me complaining that the meter must be faulty, Yorkshire Water are adamant that it's not. Nothing I can do about it either apart from taking no more showers!
Jesus Christ how much water do you use? Ours is under £200 for a year.Just gone through the calculator again.
Currently pay £601.40 a year, with a meter i would pay £694.10.
505.26 liters a day.
I just filled the questionnaire in, how many showers, what type of shower, baths, car washing per week, patio cleaning a year, watering the garden, washing machine, washing the dishes, toilet flushes per day.Jesus Christ how much water do you use? Ours is under £200 for a year.