Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Apr 2010
- Posts
- 5,298
- Location
- Ipswich
Yeah pretty much Amnesia always dragging us through pages of contrarian bs and semantic arguments.**** me this thread has turned cringey as ****
Super cringe.
Yeah pretty much Amnesia always dragging us through pages of contrarian bs and semantic arguments.**** me this thread has turned cringey as ****
he ain't dragging it through pages all on his own.Yeah pretty much Amnesia always dragging us through pages of contrarian bs and semantic arguments.
Super cringe.
Your not wrong at all lol. People should just ignore and move on and stick to more relevant details.he ain't dragging it through pages all on his own.
All down to one comrade derp.**** me this thread has turned cringey as ****
nope, it most certainly isn't down to one anybody.All down to one comrade derp.
I put him on ignore weeks ago. Been so much nicer without the pedantic arguments and constant attempts to derail and rabbit hole.Your not wrong at all lol. People should just ignore and move on and stick to more relevant details.
It takes at least two to Tango.All down to one comrade derp.
Taking us down a dowie hole.....Yeah pretty much Amnesia always dragging us through pages of contrarian bs and semantic arguments.
Super cringe.
It’s a quid pro quo.I'm surprised Russia are sticking to the grain agreement, but then again also not, because it's not war but a special operation so I guess under those terms you don't have to blockade the country from exports, still pretty weird though
It’s a quid pro quo.
Russian sanctions lifted in response.
The rouble is soaring and Putin is stronger than ever - our sanctions have backfired
Western sanctions against Russia are the most ill-conceived and counterproductive policy in recent international history.
World energy prices are rocketing, inflation is soaring, supply chains are chaotic and millions are being starved of gas, grain and fertiliser. Yet Vladimir Putin’s barbarity only escalates
......
To criticise western sanctions is close to anathema. Defence analysts are dumb on the subject. Strategy thinktanks are silent. Britain’s putative leaders, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak, compete in belligerent rhetoric, promising ever tougher sanctions without a word of purpose. Yet, hint at scepticism on the subject and you will be excoriated as “pro-Putin” and anti-Ukraine. Sanctions are the war cry of the west’s crusade.
The reality of sanctions on Russia is that they invite retaliation. Putin is free to freeze Europe this winter.
Britain’s domestic gas bills face tripling inside a year. The chief beneficiary is none other than Russia, whose energy exports to Asia have soared, driving its balance of payments into unprecedented surplus. The rouble is one of the world’s strongest currencies this year, having strengthened since January by nearly 50%.
Moscow is neither small nor weak. Another observer, the Royal United Services Institute’s Russia expert Richard Connolly, has charted Putin’s response to the sanctions imposed on him since his 2014 seizure of Crimea and Donbas. Their objective was to change Russia’s course in those regions and deter further aggression. Their failure could hardly be more glaring.
Russia is “slowly adjusting to its new circumstances”. Sanctions have promoted trade with China, Iran and India. They have benefited “insiders connected to Putin and the ruling entourage, making huge profits from import substitution”.
Meanwhile, the west and its peoples have been plunged into recession. Leadership has been shaken and insecurity spread in Britain, France, Italy and the US. Gas-starved Germany and Hungary are close to dancing to Putin’s tune. Living costs are escalating everywhere. Yet still no one dares question sanctions. It is sacrilege to admit their failure or conceive retreat.
It’s a quid pro quo.
Russian sanctions lifted in response.
Foodstuffs and fertilisers. Win win…apart from it helping pay for the war - both sides.
Sell their gas... how?
They can't exactly move pipelines and building new ones is rather awkward with sanctions.
Not to mention it tends to take years to build the pipelines, or even just new gas terminals for transport by ship (and then you need the ships, there are reasons pipelines are preferred).Sell their gas... how?
They can't exactly move pipelines (vast majority of which is directed towards Europe) and building new ones is rather awkward with sanctions.
It got boring when they banned the videos of tanks getting spanked by Javlins and such.Your not wrong at all lol. People should just ignore and move on and stick to more relevant details.
As HH says, those pipelines don't exist, they'll take years to build and likely require parts from countries that are embargoing Russia so either you make do with parts that sort of work but are lower quality (more prone to breaking) or are sort of safe but more prone to accidents.China, India, Iran, .... the list goes on. All behind the Red Iron Curtain..
I don't think our sanctions have entirely been negative - they have reduces/stopped the reliance on Russian gas and placed dampers on the influence.
Sell their gas... how?
They can't exactly move pipelines (vast majority of which is directed towards Europe) and building new ones is rather awkward with sanctions.
They don't have the pipelines in place to do it though.
Not to mention it tends to take years to build the pipelines, or even just new gas terminals for transport by ship (and then you need the ships, there are reasons pipelines are preferred).
Mongolia expects Russia to begin construction of the “Power of Siberia 2” gas pipeline through its territory to China within two years, as Moscow moves to connect its Europe-supplying gasfields to Asia for the first time.
Russia has agreed a 30-year contract to supply gas to China via a new pipeline and will settle the new gas sales in euros, bolstering an energy alliance with Beijing amid Moscow's strained ties with the West over Ukraine and other issues.
Look at the date of that Reuters article, notice anything?They do not have the pipeline to China built yet but the estimated date is sometime in 2024.
https://www.ft.com/content/f0080bf6-5e7d-44be-871f-a5d44dccf5c5
Russia has agreed a 30-year contract to supply gas to China through this new pipeline.
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-...as-deal-using-new-pipeline-source-2022-02-04/