*** The Official Boxing Thread ***Do Not Discuss Illegal Streams

I’ve seen the fight are you talking about 2 minutes into the 2nd round where Whyte caught him with a left hook?

Are you saying boxers are expected never to get hurt during a 12 round contest?
I am not saying that every boxing fan would like to see KO in figths but AJ its overhyped for me he lost 3 fights in last 5. For me its not a graet champion he should show power in 2nd fight againts Usyk. Remember gerat champions always comming back in 2nd fight like lets say Lenox Lewis vs Rahman 2.
 
I am not saying that every boxing fan would like to see KO in figths but AJ its overhyped for me he lost 3 fights in last 5. For me its not a graet champion he should show power in 2nd fight againts Usyk. Remember gerat champions always comming back in 2nd fight like lets say Lenox Lewis vs Rahman 2.
Overhyped by who? So because he didn’t beat Usyk in the rematch he’s not a ‘graet champion’. How about you put it into perspective. Usyk is an Olympic Gold medalist, undisputed Cruiserweight champion and now unified Heavyweight champion in 20 pro fights. At what point do you say perhaps this guy is special and losing against him after a close fight, when a lot of people were saying he was getting knocked out, is no shame.

It seems like your one of these haters that just doesn’t want to give the guy his dues. And by the way Rahman is not even in the same league as Usyk the better comparison would have been Ruiz and Aj did beat him in the rematch.
 
Overhyped by who? So because he didn’t beat Usyk in the rematch he’s not a ‘graet champion’. How about you put it into perspective. Usyk is an Olympic Gold medalist, undisputed Cruiserweight champion and now unified Heavyweight champion in 20 pro fights. At what point do you say perhaps this guy is special and losing against him after a close fight, when a lot of people were saying he was getting knocked out, is no shame.

It seems like your one of these haters that just doesn’t want to give the guy his dues. And by the way Rahman is not even in the same league as Usyk the better comparison would have been Ruiz and Aj did beat him in the rematch.
I am not looking for argument here every person has different opinion for me its not great champion but i see you like Usyk so mutch, as far i can see Usyk only was fihting AJ thats only 2 fights in heavyweight devision if he is graet champion he should show this in next lets say 3 more figths againts big boys them we have claer picture.
 
I am not looking for argument here every person has different opinion for me its not great champion but i see you like Usyk so mutch, asfar i can see Usyk only was fihting AJ thats only 2 fights in heavyweight devision if he is graet champion he should show this in next lets say 3 more figths againts big guys them we have claer picture.
Your entitled to your opinion but that’s all it is. I can see you don’t follow boxing because you would know Usyk has had more than 2 fights at heavyweight. Joshua has been a great champion but he suffered a shock defeat to Ruiz which he avenged and then was beaten by a guy that clearly has something about him. Unfortunately casuals take that as AJ being useless because they generally don’t know what they are talking about but think they do.
 
Your entitled to your opinion but that’s all it is. I can see you don’t follow boxing because you would know Usyk has had more than 2 fights at heavyweight. Joshua has been a great champion but he suffered a shock defeat to Ruiz which he avenged and then was beaten by a guy that clearly has something about him. Unfortunately casuals take that as AJ being useless because they generally don’t know what they are talking about but think they do.
Like what 37 years old Chazz Witherspoon and 36 Chisora both fighter not in prime. I do follow boxing and i have my opinion please stop judging people if they have different opinon.
 
I really don't understand the 'AJ is overrated/a hype job' argument. The facts speak for themselves. All you need to do is look at his resume, the number of top 10 boxers he has shared a ring with, his title defences and the fact he is now a 2 time champion. When you look beyond that and dig deeper into his non-existent amateur career (when compared to the likes of Usyk), it's even more impressive that he managed to reach the heights he has.

A lot of the all time greats have lost multiple times - Ali, Lewis, Tyson, Foreman, Holyfield, Fraizer etc. AJ lost against Ruiz and then won convincingly in the rematch. He lost against Usyk twice yes, but Usyk is a p4p champion and will likely be regarded as one of the greatest ever. It's not like he lost against Lucas Browne.

I don't think anyone is claiming AJ is an all time great, but saying he's overrated is a big disservice to a great career.

I would be interested in seeing a graph which shows the parallels between fans who think AJ is a hype job but see Fury as one of the greatest ever to lace up gloves.
 
I guess he feared gassing out and then making headlines for getting KOd but I'd have liked AJ to put it on Usyk from round one (maybe not literally round one, but much earlier than round none). Easier said than done yeah but I think he was still too reserved and didn't use his size.
 
Can’t answer that. My favourites are in no particular order. Prince Naseem in his prime was almost untouchable, same as Tyson. Mayweather one of the best to ever do it and best of his era. Roy Jones Jr again simply untouchable until he came back down from Heavy. Marvin Hagler was absolute machine and a tuff, tuff guy. By the way AJ isn’t in this bracket but he a solid fighter.
 
I really don't understand the 'AJ is overrated/a hype job' argument. The facts speak for themselves. All you need to do is look at his resume, the number of top 10 boxers he has shared a ring with, his title defences and the fact he is now a 2 time champion. When you look beyond that and dig deeper into his non-existent amateur career (when compared to the likes of Usyk), it's even more impressive that he managed to reach the heights he has.

A lot of the all time greats have lost multiple times - Ali, Lewis, Tyson, Foreman, Holyfield, Fraizer etc. AJ lost against Ruiz and then won convincingly in the rematch. He lost against Usyk twice yes, but Usyk is a p4p champion and will likely be regarded as one of the greatest ever. It's not like he lost against Lucas Browne.

I don't think anyone is claiming AJ is an all time great, but saying he's overrated is a big disservice to a great career.

I would be interested in seeing a graph which shows the parallels between fans who think AJ is a hype job but see Fury as one of the greatest ever to lace up gloves.
Good piont he has good amateur career and to be clear i dont disrespect AJ just he should show more heart in 2nd fight vs Usyk in my opinion. Usyk will we see in the future if its p4p champion (in heavyweight devision) in time.
 
I am not looking for argument here every person has different opinion for me its not great champion but i see you like Usyk so mutch, as far i can see Usyk only was fihting AJ thats only 2 fights in heavyweight devision if he is graet champion he should show this in next lets say 3 more figths againts big boys them we have claer picture.
By your standards, who is a great champion? AJ had been in nothing but world title fights from his 16th fight onwards. He didn't have a massive amateur career and even then in his short amateur career he won silver at the world championships and a, if being honest gifted, gold at the London Olympics. He never ducked a mandatory, unified twice and defended his belt a bunch of times. Fought names from the top 10 and came up short against a potential generational great. What about AJ makes him a bad champion and perhaps you can compare him to someone you think was a great champion.

It's not about having an argument but I'd just like to see your reasoning for him not being a great champion. Just back up what you're saying is all.
I really don't understand the 'AJ is overrated/a hype job' argument. The facts speak for themselves. All you need to do is look at his resume, the number of top 10 boxers he has shared a ring with, his title defences and the fact he is now a 2 time champion. When you look beyond that and dig deeper into his non-existent amateur career (when compared to the likes of Usyk), it's even more impressive that he managed to reach the heights he has.

A lot of the all time greats have lost multiple times - Ali, Lewis, Tyson, Foreman, Holyfield, Fraizer etc. AJ lost against Ruiz and then won convincingly in the rematch. He lost against Usyk twice yes, but Usyk is a p4p champion and will likely be regarded as one of the greatest ever. It's not like he lost against Lucas Browne.

I don't think anyone is claiming AJ is an all time great, but saying he's overrated is a big disservice to a great career.

I would be interested in seeing a graph which shows the parallels between fans who think AJ is a hype job but see Fury as one of the greatest ever to lace up gloves.


Anyone who achieved what he did can't be called a hype job, seriously. Sure, he had the Sky machine behind him and they probably over-egged him a bit but his record speaks for himself. Doing this from memory and not looking at BoxRec but he fought Charles Martin in his 16th fight for the IBF belt, then Dominic Breazelle as a voluntary, then he unified with Klitschko for the vacant (cause Fury was a drug cheat and decided to let himself go) WBA and IBO belts and then after that wasn't he straight into another unification with Parker for the WBO belt? Then spent a year or so trying to make the Wilder fight for undisputed but got messed around. He could've very well been undisputed by now had things gone differently.

Is he going to be the greatest of all time, of course not. Has he had one of the better careers at heavyweight in a long time? absolutely.


I guess he feared gassing out and then making headlines for getting KOd but I'd have liked AJ to put it on Usyk from round one (maybe not literally round one, but much earlier than round none). Easier said than done yeah but I think he was still too reserved and didn't use his size.

He did so much better than the first fight but sometimes you just have to accept someone has your number and they're better than you. I think of Usyk being similar to Floyd Mayweather. When viewing from outside of the ring the answer is simple. Apply pressure and force the action on him. You then get fighters before they fight Floyd explain how they're going to really put it on him and he hasn't fought someone like him before. Then comes fight night and they realise they easy plan they were talking was nonsense. You can't put it on Floyd because Floyd gives you no openings. He is just too damn good.

Funnily enough, when I was watching the fight with my partner we both got gassed during round 9. It looked like AJ had hurt Usyk (watching it back again, he didn't) and may have had a chance of forcing a stoppage. But what happened after that point was spectacular. Usyk came out and easily took the next 3 rounds. It was like when FMJ was fighting Shane Moseley. Moseley hit Mayweather better than anyone ever did (Maidana was close at the end of the round) and properly buckled Mayweathers legs. What happened after round 3 was beautiful. He came out and put one hell of a beating on Shane for the rest of the fight. That was what Usyk reminded me of during rounds 9-12. Just a special special fighter.
 
Can’t answer that. My favourites are in no particular order. Prince Naseem in his prime was almost untouchable, same as Tyson. Mayweather one of the best to ever do it and best of his era. Roy Jones Jr again simply untouchable until he came back down from Heavy. Marvin Hagler was absolute machine and a tuff, tuff guy. By the way AJ isn’t in this bracket but he a solid fighter.
Very good opinion very good boxers but for me is Pacman 8 division champion but this just me.
 
I guess he feared gassing out and then making headlines for getting KOd but I'd have liked AJ to put it on Usyk from round one (maybe not literally round one, but much earlier than round none). Easier said than done yeah but I think he was still too reserved and didn't use his size.
Maybe he defiantly has stamina issues and perhaps is mindful of how to gauge the 12 round distance.
It’s very hard to gauge with Usyk because from the outside it looks Aj just needs to go for it but it can’t be just as simple as that. Usyk is like Mayweather in the sense he doesn’t have knock out power but he hits hard enough to keep you honest and if you take him for granted he’ll make you pay for it.
 
Very good opinion very good boxers but for me is Pacman 8 division champion but this just me.
Nah great, great fighter but Mayweather bossed that fight. You can’t claim to be best of your era if you lose against the best. Marquez also gave him hell and Mayweather again made it look easy. Sorry but Mayweather is a level above as he proved in the ring.
 
Can’t answer that. My favourites are in no particular order. Prince Naseem in his prime was almost untouchable, same as Tyson. Mayweather one of the best to ever do it and best of his era. Roy Jones Jr again simply untouchable until he came back down from Heavy. Marvin Hagler was absolute machine and a tuff, tuff guy. By the way AJ isn’t in this bracket but he a solid fighter.
Prince Naseem was a talent but it's sad he didn't have the dedication to match his ability. Tyson is a weird one. Pre-prison he was incredible but when you actually look at his record when fighting credible champions, he fell short a lot more than he actually succeeded.

For me it's Mayweather. I was able to follow his career for most of it rather than revisiting old fights. What he could do in a ring was immense and the way he could make supreme top tier fighters look average shouldn't ever be ignored.

You can add Ray Leonard, Hearns, Duran, Whittaker, Jackson Jr, Homles and Hopkins to that list also. Probably many, many more I'm forgetting.
 
Nah great, great fighter but Mayweather bossed that fight. You can’t claim to be best of your era if you lose against the best. Marquez also gave him hell and Mayweather again made it look easy. Sorry but Mayweather is a level above as he proved in the ring.
I am with you 100% but fight with Money was to late i am not trying to defend Pacman but hes achievements as 8 division champion its great.
 
Prince Naseem was a talent but it's sad he didn't have the dedication to match his ability. Tyson is a weird one. Pre-prison he was incredible but when you actually look at his record when fighting credible champions, he fell short a lot more than he actually succeeded.

For me it's Mayweather. I was able to follow his career for most of it rather than revisiting old fights. What he could do in a ring was immense and the way he could make supreme top tier fighters look average shouldn't ever be ignored.

You can add Ray Leonard, Hearns, Duran, Whittaker, Jackson Jr, Homles and Hopkins to that list also. Probably many, many more I'm forgetting.
I do agree Money man was great and never lost but not entertaining in my opinion if you see what i mean.
 
I am with you 100% but fight with Money was to late i am not trying to defend Pacman but hes achievements as 8 division champion its great.

I always chuckle at the view the fight was too late. For sure, it was. A good few years too late. But the funny thing is, Floyd is older than Manny. If it happened any sooner, the result would've been the same.
 
Prince Naseem was a talent but it's sad he didn't have the dedication to match his ability. Tyson is a weird one. Pre-prison he was incredible but when you actually look at his record when fighting credible champions, he fell short a lot more than he actually succeeded.

For me it's Mayweather. I was able to follow his career for most of it rather than revisiting old fights. What he could do in a ring was immense and the way he could make supreme top tier fighters look average shouldn't ever be ignored.

You can add Ray Leonard, Hearns, Duran, Whittaker, Jackson Jr, Homles and Hopkins to that list also. Probably many, many more I'm forgetting.
No I get it but watching Prince Naseem was something special. That’s who I wanted to be as a young kid, he was special but dedication meant he didn’t quite achieve what he could have, which is strange when you think what he did actually achieve. Only lost to Barrera after he lost interest. Tyson was another one that was just electric but the death of Cus d’amato put a holt to his career. He was never the same after.

Mayweather just genius level but Roy Jones belongs in the same bracket. He made James Toney look ordinary in his first fight at smw. He was untouchable no one could get near him, he was the best at mw and then smw, then lh and then decided I’ll move up to HW and win a world title there. He was special.
 
Back
Top Bottom