Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
How many months would that take? And with what equipment? Their 'professional army' ins't exactly looking very good at its job at the moment.
Plus I've read people saying that many training staff and some training equipment was pushed out to the front line, so even their ability to train up new conscripts will be impeded.
 
According to the BBC Russia's largest armoured vehicle producer has switched to around the clock production and their workers denied holiday/leave which would be a sign of increased mobilisation - doesn't make much sense though given the large amount of stock Russia still has in reserves and retired/mothballed stock (even if some in poor state) and how newer stuff other than the likes of the GAZ Tigr has been of limited use so far - hardly any T-90s fielded for instance.

Lots of their reserves are rotting in fields and/or have been stripped bare by corrupt military types...
 
Lots of their reserves are rotting in fields and/or have been stripped bare by corrupt military types...
After hearing a brief summary of the state that the Moskva was in when last inspected before being sunk (most recent Lazerpig video, quality entertainment) it does seem pretty likely that only a small proportion of the 'reserves' will even have a working drivetrain and main gun, let alone all the other systems they may in theory be fitted with.
 
TBH in the current Ukraine theatre I am not sure MBTs are a high value asset anyway that due to long lead times the west would want potentially being on the front line.

Both sides retain some air power so I think any heavy usage of MBTs is a risky strategy.
If however this ends up basically with Ukraine back in control of its own lands then for defensive purposes, especially say 50 miles back from the border they would likely provide a very rigid and difficult defensive line should Russia try its own Blitzkrieg type attack.
 
I don't know but talking about stopping grain convoys and targeting civilian power infrastructure only shows to Ukrainians what living under the Russian yoke would be like.
Well, at this stage IF people were given a free choice, then even in the former "pro-Russian" areas, then few would choose Russia.

Okay, a few warlords and hanger-ons in the "people's republic" might still be pro Russian but being press-ganged and used as expendable cannon must have got at least some people thinking. Those who haven't been expended yet, that is.
 
Well, at this stage IF people were given a free choice, then even in the former "pro-Russian" areas, then few would choose Russia.

Okay, a few warlords and hanger-ons in the "people's republic" might still be pro Russian but being press-ganged and used as expendable cannon must have got at least some people thinking. Those who haven't been expended yet, that is.
this is what baffles me about donetsk and luhansk...why would you chose to become part of russia...if you had stuck with ukraine you could have had free movement in the EU, investment from the EU, you wouldnt be press ganged into fighting for the russians who even though you invited them in, treat you with utter contempt as you are not really a russian!
 
Whatever the real numbers, I find it quite questionable at this stage in the war when official Russian accounts have been shown to be so inaccurate that the BBC would headline an article with a quote from a Russian official.

Just as the BBC also headline with quotes from Ukrainian officials. Impressive for the Tory propaganda service.
 
this is what baffles me about donetsk and luhansk...why would you chose to become part of russia...if you had stuck with ukraine you could have had free movement in the EU, investment from the EU, you wouldnt be press ganged into fighting for the russians who even though you invited them in, treat you with utter contempt as you are not really a russian!

Some folk see the old soviet days with rose tinted glasses. Easy to get rich off corruption as well.
 
According to the BBC Russia's largest armoured vehicle producer has switched to around the clock production and their workers denied holiday/leave which would be a sign of increased mobilisation - doesn't make much sense though given the large amount of stock Russia still has in reserves and retired/mothballed stock (even if some in poor state) and how newer stuff other than the likes of the GAZ Tigr has been of limited use so far - hardly any T-90s fielded for instance.
Probably hampered by the 2014 sanctions which prohibit the sale of dual use technology to Russia and it's it's allies.
 
this is what baffles me about donetsk and luhansk...why would you chose to become part of russia...

They didn't. The whole thing was always a Russian op. These areas had a higher proportion of pro-Russian people who were upset by Yanukovych being forced out in 2014, but few people wanted to actually join Russia or leave Ukraine; instead they wanted Ukraine to have a Russian facing foreign policy and a close relationship with Russia on trade, defence, etc.

According to the BBC Russia's largest armoured vehicle producer has switched to around the clock production and their workers denied holiday/leave which would be a sign of increased mobilisation - doesn't make much sense though given the large amount of stock Russia still has in reserves and retired/mothballed stock (even if some in poor state) and how newer stuff other than the likes of the GAZ Tigr has been of limited use so far - hardly any T-90s fielded for instance.

Most of that stock is useless without substantial work and parts that Russia may not even have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom