I'm going to assume you are on a wind up again.
Ukraine was defending it's land,cities etc,
Should they have stood in an empty field and duked it out ?
Pray tell,how you would defend a country?
For that matter let's see all these hospitals and schools that were fortified etc, I'm sure you have bucket loads of evidence to provide.
My point, that you deliberately miss, is that AI reported "bad Russians" for months to full worldwide applause, yet after 1 single "the Ukrainians have done a bad thing which is nowhere near as bad as the stuff Russia doing" report suddenly you now hate them, believing them to now be Russian propaganda or similar.
Again, the difference between "the truth" vs propaganda.
Its easy to see you haven't read the report made by the actual observers on the ground, you really should, it's far more inoffensive and justifiable than you might imagine, once you have facts instead of Social Media hatred to go on. AI even said in the report that Ukraines actions don't excuse Russia action in committing atrocities, which you'd know if, again, you'd read the one single thing that you are tearing apart. Here's a link - https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/n...krainian-fighting-tactics-endanger-civilians/
Now compare the very mild language in that to the language they used berating Russia for committing atrocities, or would that be too much to ask that you read rather than blindly react?
I do agree with Mercenary in their quote, AI look for war to be perfect when it is anything but which means they often will report on both sides even when there is a distinct "good vs bad" side, however hiding the mistakes of one side because "they're the good guys" would make them just as bad as a pro-Russian troll doing the same for their side as neither woul then care for the truth.