FWIW, I don't (and I think I can speak for others here) think its some scandalous revelation, I just think it was something very unwelcome and support it being 'fixed'.Well balanced article on the Twitter Files here. tl;dr: both sides of the argument can score a point or two, but overall there's no scandalous revelation to be found.
However, this reads as an highly subjective opinion piece just discussing both sides of the argument, it's fence sitting at it's worst
In the end, I think it’s hard to disagree with David French when he writes:
The picture that emerges is of a company that simply could not create and maintain clear, coherent, and consistent standards to restrict or manage allegedly harmful speech on its platform. Moreover, it’s plain that Twitter’s moderation czars existed within an ideological monoculture that made them far more tolerant toward the excesses of their own allies.
And quickly opens on the nothing burger side with
so just cites some anecdotal instances etc, which I'm not dismissiing, I'm saying its too early to have an objective discussion.There’s also the question of exactly what the Twitter Files show. Much of the information that has been presented so far has been divorced from any useful context.
I won't go as far as saying this is some form of copium because that would not be honest, it's an opinion and one I don't hugely disagree with, but she has no conclusion other than pointing out non twitter file Musk behaviour and saying it's unwelcome, and again, I don't disagree, Musk being Musk is hardly a surprise and I certainly wouldn't advise him it's a wholesome way forward.