• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

RX6700XT v RX6750XT v RTX3060Ti

I don't think you understand anything. According to you VRAM exists but has no function, which raises the question why is it present at all on GPUS? and also that it is impossible to run out of VRAM... :cry:
See? Now that's a strawman. I never said it has no function, you are just making stuff up at this point.
 
See? Now that's a strawman. I never said it has no function, you are just making stuff up at this point.

LMAO here's your own post...

"Vram is irrelevant, it could have 500 megabytes for all I care."

Irrelevant and you'd therefore happily buy a card with 500MB because it doesn't matter...

So, from your own statements - 1. VRAM is irrelevant 2. You can't exceed 8GB of VRAM ( :cry: ) 3. An amount of VRAM (500MB) from 2008 is entirely sufficient for today as VRAM doesn't matter...

 
LMAO here's your own post...

"Vram is irrelevant, it could have 500 megabytes for all I care."

Irrelevant and you'd therefore happily buy a card with 500MB because it doesn't matter...

So, from your own statements - 1. VRAM is irrelevant 2. You can't exceed 8GB of VRAM ( :cry: ) 3. An amount of VRAM (500MB) from 2008 is entirely sufficient for today as VRAM doesn't matter...

And another strawman, you are on a roll. The fact that you keep cherrypicking and putting words in my mouth that i never said not only prove you are wrong, but also that you know that you are wrong,, else you would be arguing with what I actually said :)

If a 500 megabyte vram card is faster than a 20000 terabyte vram card, ill take the 500 megabyte card any day every day. Performance is what I buy with my money, not specs. 3090 has more vram than 4080, does it matter?
 
Last edited:
And another strawman, you are on a roll. The fact that you keep cherrypicking and putting words in my mouth that i never said not only prove you are wrong, but also that you know that you are wrong,, else you would be arguing with what I actually said :)


Those are the actual words you wrote...a direct quote. Once again for the hard of reading - "Vram is irrelevant, it could have 500 megabytes for all I care."

:cry:
 
Im still on fence about whether 8gb VRAM is a hinderance. If we remember most gamers on steam do not have over 8gb VRAM then I dont see game devs in a hurry to push requirements above that.

Perhaps the 8gb is only relevant at 4k gaming? I havent seen conclusive evidence that right now, 8gb is no good.

Will 8gb be "unplayable" for new games in 2 years?
 
Im still on fence about whether 8gb VRAM is a hinderance. If we remember most gamers on steam do not have over 8gb VRAM then I dont see game devs in a hurry to push requirements above that.

Perhaps the 8gb is only relevant at 4k gaming? I havent seen conclusive evidence that right now, 8gb is no good.

Will 8gb be "unplayable" for new games in 2 years?

Most gamers on Steam are running 10 year only systems playing 10 year old games.
 
Im still on fence about whether 8gb VRAM is a hinderance. If we remember most gamers on steam do not have over 8gb VRAM then I dont see game devs in a hurry to push requirements above that.

Perhaps the 8gb is only relevant at 4k gaming? I havent seen conclusive evidence that right now, 8gb is no good.

Will 8gb be "unplayable" for new games in 2 years?

Would you like to pay £500 to find out?

No-one would claim 8GB is "no good" but there are already plenty of games which exceed it, and going forward 8GB is going to become increasingly problematic. I would not be spending hundreds of quid on something already tottering on the edge of being less than ideal. That does not make sense.

Both PS5 and XBOX series X have 16GB VRAM at £500, let that sink in, and NV want nearly that amount for 8GB and just a GPU at that...I had a 8GB card 5 years ago that cost £150...

;)
 
Last edited:
Im still on fence about whether 8gb VRAM is a hinderance. If we remember most gamers on steam do not have over 8gb VRAM then I dont see game devs in a hurry to push requirements above that.

Perhaps the 8gb is only relevant at 4k gaming? I havent seen conclusive evidence that right now, 8gb is no good.

Will 8gb be "unplayable" for new games in 2 years?
You dont need to be on the fence. The 3060ti is meant for 1440p and dlss for heavier games. Your problem is never going to be vram with that card.

I still remember the outcry with the 3gb 1060. I had that card, alongside a 1060 6gb. Changed them both at the same time cause raster performnace stinked way before the 3gb was an issue. I still remeber, the only game that had issues due to vram was.... Pubg with ultra textures. The game looked ugly regardless. I mean logically, whats the absolute worst that can happen, drop textures from ultra to high in some game 3 years down the lane? Big whoop.
 
Or don't compomise and don't lower settings...it's up to you really. I personally love all my textures set to as high as possible and all those mods and texture packs in my games...

Why compromise after spending half a G on GPU?
 
85% of GPU's in the steam hardware survey are 8GB or less.
The only card(s) in the top 40 GPU with more than 8GB is the 3080(Ti)

8GB gaming is so completely dead :D

I expect it's only an issue for 4k, high res textures, though personally I find moving the sliders a notch down from placebo works just fine.
Resizable bar and a decent amount of fast system memory helps
 
85% of GPU's in the steam hardware survey are 8GB or less.
The only card(s) in the top 40 GPU with more than 8GB is the 3080(Ti)

8GB gaming is so completely dead :D

I expect it's only an issue for 4k, high res textures, though personally I find moving the sliders a notch down from placebo works just fine.
Resizable bar and a decent amount of fast system memory helps

Most gamers on Steam are running 10 year only systems playing 10 year old games.
--------------------

All right ok....


I play at 1440p 165hz using Gsync, so no Vsync, everything maxed except for MSAA which is set to 4x (I really don't know why they didn't choose TAA as an anti aliasing). My pc has a 5600X on an X470 mobo with 32gb of 3200 c16 RAM, a 240 AIO and an RTX 3070 Ti, so I'm comfortable when it comes to having proper hardware, or so I thought.

First thing I noticed was the stuttering, which was really odd, as I never leave anything running in the background, temps areà always below 60, so I mostly never run into stutters on my games unless it is very poorly optimized. So I turned on afterburner to see what was going on, and the frametime graph is constantly showing these big spikes specially when arriving at new areas. I looked at the memory usage and it was showing 7.5gb constant usage of VRAM which was not what the benchmark showed, the benchmark showed 6.6gb, so I thought maybe this is causing the stuttering, being to close to Vramqq limits and so I turned textures to Ultra and VRAm went to 6/6.5gb. Unfortunately the stuttering remains even on high textures, but what is strange and this is probably a bug is textures around me and at the distance don't load on Ultra but some load on High. Roads, trees, rocks, hills, look like PS2 era. I looked online and it seems a lot of people are facing this issue so I hope PG fixes this ASAP.

There is a slight hitching when entering new areas when you're on the or over the VRam limit, but its not that bad. At least if you run a fast NVMe.

The real problem is this.


If you ignore that warning message the game will eventually turn from a very good looking game to a very bad looking game, really horrible road-surface and missing textures in the folage.

Like this from one of my own.

prWHNjd.png



No, this is not the only game my 8GB 2070 Super has problems with...
 
Last edited:
85% of GPU's in the steam hardware survey are 8GB or less.
The only card(s) in the top 40 GPU with more than 8GB is the 3080(Ti)

8GB gaming is so completely dead :D

I expect it's only an issue for 4k, high res textures, though personally I find moving the sliders a notch down from placebo works just fine.
Resizable bar and a decent amount of fast system memory helps

How many of them spent £500 on a GPU recently? or ever?
 
--------------------

All right ok....




There is a slight hitching when entering new areas when you're on the or over the VRam limit, but its not that bad. At least if you run a fast NVMe.

The real problem is this.


If you ignore that warning message the game will eventually turn from a very good looking game to a very bad looking game, really horrible road-surface and missing textures in the folage.

Like this from one of my own.

prWHNjd.png



No, this is not the only game my 8GB 2070 Super has problems with...
But your framerate is already dropping below 60. If you use settings that wont drop your framerates to 60, you won't have those issues will you?
 
Back
Top Bottom