Greenlizard0 PL & FA Cup QF Football Thread ** spoilers ** [17th - 19th March 2023]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well Im not a Toon fan but I really have no idea why thats offside.

Yes he's offside when its crossed but its not to him and then the Forest player clears it intentionally
 
Well Im not a Toon fan but I really have no idea why thats offside.

Yes he's offside when its crossed but its not to him and then the Forest player clears it intentionally
Exactly, he wasn’t active until a forest player kicked it to him.
 
But the Forest player clears it intentionally so its a new phase.

How is it a new phase? If the Newcastle player had be onside, the clearance would gone out for a throw it. The newcastle player wouldn't have been near him
 
Last edited:
How is it a new phase? If the Newcastle player had be onside, the clearance would gone out for a throw it. The newcastle player wouldn't have been near him
Because the forest player played it. So it’s a new phase because Newcastle are not attacking.
 
How is it a new phase? If the Newcastle player had be onside, the clearance would gone out for a throw it. The newcastle player wouldn't have been near him
Same way Mo was onside this season, can't remember the game, Wolves maybe, a player tried to head it with Mo behind him.

Kane v Liverpool a few years back as Lovren was said to have played the ball.

That's the rule
 
Because the forest player played it. So it’s a new phase because Newcastle are not attacking.

He played it, but it comes off a newcastle player who is offside. The newcastle player gains a massive advantage, he wouldn't have been near the clearance to make that block had he been onside originally
 
He played it, but it comes off a newcastle player who is offside. The newcastle player gains a massive advantage, he wouldn't have been near the clearance to make that block had he been onside originally
But that is classed as a new phase, same with the Mo goal this season and there's been others like it too.
 
But that is classed as a new phase, same with the Mo goal this season and there's been others like it too.

I dont see how its not the fair call. That ball goes out for a throw in had the newcastle player been onside originally
 
Last edited:
I dont see how its not the fair call. That ball goes out for a throw in had the newcastle player been onside originally
Yes I agree to some extent but the rules say different. Unless we are missing something as they haven't actually said why it was offside yet.

Like the Mo one and I'm a Liverpool fan. He was stood offside but not going for the ball, their player went to head it and made a mess of it and it bought Mo back onside and into play.
 

These are the rules by the way. Offside player doesn't automatically become onside just because a defender has touched it. Y'know, like with a lot of decisions in football, its open to interpretation
 
Last edited:

These are the rules by the way. Offside player doesn't automatically become onside just because a defender has touched it. Y'know, like with a lot of decisions in football, its open to interpretation
Forest player clearly intentionally plays it for me. He's clearing a cross. Unless they think it just hit him
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom