Geez, you're right, it's so obvious. You should probably let them know because I think they're ****ing around with nitrogen for no reason, they can just go down to Walmart and buy some Propofol.
Still quite surprised for a country they blindly puts up with gun crime.. they don’t cut their losses and run an NRA execution quad.
I’m on the fence - I can see the capital punishment aspect and that life in a bad prison is worse than no life. It comes down to rights - if you kill do you forfeit the right to life? If so is that immediate or only over a threshold?
As someone accused, then convicted and sentenced - what if you are innocent?
The capital punishment is often rooted in religion, from the days of an eye-for-an-eye but kept everyone in check by threatening eternal torture so only those the religious justice deemed guilty were fair game (irrespective of guilt). Innocent were left to a supreme court.. completely removing responsibility and accountability.
Comes down to - should religion be confused with country law?
Law find you guilty.. the why don’t we hold the legal officers accountable for killing an innocent person, and all facts would need to remove all accountability from the legal executing team..
In short the law prevents one person killing another, even in revenge, and the law also removes the right to kill from the legal process - it is the law court that passes sentence.
Law or religious law?
Thinking more I see, if the individual has no right to kill another then they don’t have the right to demand or expect the death penalty.
Now that doesn’t stop your legal system going - mate you killed and were sentenced 10 times.. and we don have to take this **** from you..
The question then becomes the state owns the lives of the voters? The court jury doesn’t recommend sentence - just the state of guilt.
