Probably confusing “design for failure” with “not designed to last as long”
They’re subtly different but one is an intent to get an item to fail after X amount of time - hugely costly, and the other is going “seems to last an average of X hours of operation, that’ll do” attitude.
I think there’s an essence of that, but also, we must also not forget the fact that newer components have much stricter tolerances, as required by the higher performing parts, which means it is much easier for a component to go out of tolerance and, hence, fail.