All of them, in fact!
BRO. I wanted to grab a beer and my ribs and watch the final 3rd setter of this final
If she can't find a way to spend it, I'll gladly take it..1.5 million quid for losing though. There are worse ways to spend less than an hour.
Oh gosh, it's a bit cruel to force Anisimova to have to speak like that
given that you should consider the "pay" the culmination of all the hard work week in week out which will be similar for men and women, then the pay is the same really. sport is paid crazy I'll take that argument, but it's good that they enjoy parity on the winnings imo
why? and how can you calculate it properly to make an assessment? are the courts empty for the women's matches? a lot of people want to watch both. I don't think Wimbledon would generate half as much if it was a male only tournament. You look at the whole thing in the round
Yeah I agree with this. They're clearly physically capable of it. I imagine they're fitter than the average male professional tennis player of 40 years ago.
The injuries are a bit of a non point, surely. The men's quarters was affected heavily by injury (Dimitrov would have won best of 3), and the men's semi was arguably as well (Djokovic was clearly hampered) although it may well not have affected the result. Should men play best of 3 as well?In the final perhaps like what they use to do in the 1000 events on the mens sides.
Unless you run the tournaments at separate times?
Otherwise you run the risk of delays and more importantly injuries. As Sabalenka said the other day.
Sabalenka not interested in best-of-5s for women
Top-ranked Aryna Sabalenka wouldn't want women's tennis to move to best-of-five-set matches at Grand Slam tournaments -- like the men play -- fearing higher injury risks.www.espn.com
Aye its ridiculous they get paid the same as the men who'll play 5 sets for probably 4 hours+ tomorrow. If they want to do the same fine but until then its just preposterous.
Of course she isn't interested why would she be, why work more for the same money?! If time is an issue let the men do 3 sets as well.In the final perhaps like what they use to do in the 1000 events on the mens sides.
Unless you run the tournaments at separate times?
Otherwise you run the risk of delays and more importantly injuries. As Sabalenka said the other day.
Sabalenka not interested in best-of-5s for women
Top-ranked Aryna Sabalenka wouldn't want women's tennis to move to best-of-five-set matches at Grand Slam tournaments -- like the men play -- fearing higher injury risks.
