I don’t see that context in that video clip to mean only Alien. There are more down to earth possibilities.I don't. What I don't accept is Grusch's unsubtantiated claims.
The context was clear. He sure as hell didn't mean they had found plants in UAPs.
He claims to have spoken with 50 whistleblowers. Where are they? He claims to know crucial locations. Why doesn't he identify them?
“He claims to have spoken with 50 whistleblowers. Where are they? He claims to know crucial locations. Why doesn't he identify them?”
Even without the retaliation he suffered it wouldn’t be right for him to name them publicly without their permission. Others have come forward since David and its reported more are in the pipeline. The whistle-blower process is not fast due to the classified nature of the jobs and information these people have access to.
As for crucial location and stuff he handed all that over in the SCIF briefing. He cannot say it publicly because that means jail time and a good chance he will lose his presumably from my quick math a $1million+ pension pot.
Its if all made up and there is no evidence wouldn’t all these different groups who have gone over the evidence be calling David out as a fraud? Why would the Intelligence Community Inspector General investigation, SCIF briefing and all the others be coming back saying many of his claims are credible, urgent and with merit after looking at the evidence? You say its all unsubstantiated but everyone who has access to the classified data is saying there is something to his claims. There are just too many people involved. One of them would call him out if there was nothing to any of his claims. Even a bunch of high ranking Admirals and Generals are all backing him up. Why would they do that if he is a nut case making it all up? What more shocking even the Republicans and Democrats who pretty much never agree on anything, agree and are joining forces to back David up.
That doesn’t mean all his claims are credible. But its clear there is something to what he is saying.
EDIT: I believe 3 more whistle-blowers are due at the next briefing. Don't quote me on that it needs double checking.
Last edited: