Yeah, looking at doing my CBT and getting a 125 myself. Can't check right now, but isn't it £25 for a 125 or something?
£17. Insurance will hurt though.
Yeah, looking at doing my CBT and getting a 125 myself. Can't check right now, but isn't it £25 for a 125 or something?
Welcome to wonders of VED tax !
EV drivers have zero emissions, yet pay £195 VED a year, and people running older dirty diesels are paying just £20 a year.
The EV VED tax was back dated to include for all EV's, yet this doesn't happen for previously registered petrol & diesel cars, they continue paying what they always have !
As an EV driver I'm completely happy contributing to the wider good of the system, but make it consistent. Older dirty diesels should be priced off the road, but that doesn't happen because the people with them are 'too poor' to replace them. My view - tough, walk or ride a bike then !
It's either about improving the environment or it isn't.
I'm not worried, it's still less than my old Mazda3 Sport was a decade ago. I'm just highlighting the inconsistency of upping the tax on EVs, only to then have to offer incentives a different way.But your worried about a £200 VED charge on a car that will loose 20X that (or more) in a year in depreciation. It’s really not at all material.
Except almost everywhere has a capital gains tax equivalent and it’s really not that easy to swerve U.K. capital gains tax, particularly if the asset is deemed to be U.K. held which it will be if used U.K. money to make the original investment, if you were UK resident at the time and you used U.K. money, good luck with that.It happens with crypto as well now. Normally you'd have to pay loads of capitol gains tax when you convert it back and withdraw it. So the ones who made lots go and live abroad for 6 months (minimum you need to) and cash it out somewhere they won't have to pay taxes on it. Then bring it back to the UK when they move back.
The loopholes exist on purpose, so the ones who have the means (the ones running the place) can use it themselves. They will close the ones us plebs use, but not the big holes you need large sums to use.
Except almost everywhere has a capital gains tax equivalent and it’s really not that easy to swerve U.K. capital gains tax, particularly if the asset is deemed to be U.K. held which it will be if used U.K. money to make the original investment, if you were UK resident at the time and you used U.K. money, good luck with that.
If you want to offshore an asset you already have, you have to pay exit charges in the form of… capital gains tax…
People who talk about loopholes simply don’t have a clue about what the rules actually are and yet they post so confidently about stuff they got from Dave down the pub.
P.s. moving abroad for 6 months isn’t exactly cheap either.
A 996 Turbo is only Euro 3 compliant so doesn't meet ULEZ requirements, and there can't be many pre '05 Nissan Micras left on the road.
Meanwhile in the UK it's £220 a year to tax an RX7, at least some things are better under our governmentSo say you wanted a Skyline/RX7/Chaser etc etc, you'd be paying insane money, an R34 GTR V Spec II, is 394g/km stock, they sell for £100-150K these days, so a 150k mint one, would be €54,000 VRT! Imagine how much a tuned one would be!.
I'd imagine that's because the UK classes a 13B clue in the name, as a 1.3L, despite the 'if it was a piston engine it'd be equal to a 2.6L' factorMeanwhile in the UK it's £220 a year to tax an RX7, at least some things are better under our government![]()
That's because some importers and dealers sneakily registered them as 1.3L so the tax would be cheaper. They never should've done that, but some did and got away with it. The argument with the 13B was that its volumetric efficiency was equivalent to a 2.6L traditional ICE.I'd imagine that's because the UK classes a 13B clue in the name, as a 1.3L, despite the 'if it was a piston engine it'd be equal to a 2.6L' factor
I remember it being cheaper 14 years ago to insure a manual FD3S Twin Turbo RX7 JDM import than insure a E36 318iS - due to more 318iS' being stolen/crashed/driven by young chavs, versus the rarity of a JDM manual TT rex FD3S, my mates UKDM E46 M3 3.2L manual was also cheaper than the E36 318iS - I'd imagine because it was still expensive to insure 'for what it was' so not many bothered/crashed/nicked them 'at the time', but the Rex was cheaper than both despite being an import lol.
Meanwhile in the UK it's £220 a year to tax an RX7, at least some things are better under our government![]()
Oh and all the major crypto exchanges share information with your local friendly tax authority so it’s a lot more traceable than you seem to think it is. Small details and all that.
I mean, it IS a 1.3L, hence the '13B' engine code.That's because some importers and dealers sneakily registered them as 1.3L so the tax would be cheaper. They never should've done that, but some did and got away with it. The argument with the 13B was that its volumetric efficiency was equivalent to a 2.6L traditional ICE.
Insuring an FD was outrageously cheap back when I had one. Not sure that's the case now as they are pretty much a 40-50k+ classic for some really nice examples nowadays. I had a JDM import '98 Type RS with 20k on the clock. I paid £5700 for it!! Spent more time under the bonnet than driving the bloody thing...
Sadly, it was also registered as a 2.6 and I had to suck up that extra tax.
TBF though HK is about the size of greater London, so owning a car is much less relevant. (I don't know how good the public transport system is, nor whether you can drive onto the mainland). Growing up in London, not only did my family not have a car but I didn't bother learning to drive until I needed it for work aged 25.My friend in HK has to pay for a parking space at the car park under her building at the cost of £200 per month, for a bike. There is no other way round if you want a vehicle and the tax when you buy the car? 100%. A £10k car will cost you another £10k in tax on top.
Or Singapore....you need to bid for a licence to be even able to get a car and they are like 6 figures.
TBF though HK is about the size of greater London, so owning a car is much less relevant. (I don't know how good the public transport system is, nor whether you can drive onto the mainland). Growing up in London, not only did my family not have a car but I didn't bother learning to drive until I needed it for work aged 25.
Singapore is even tinier and largely wealthy so it makes sense that cars are disincentivised.
What has been a big shock to me is just how reliant on cars people are outside London. I don't mean the obvious people who actually need a car as they live somewhere rural - I moved to a medium-large sized town and it is just car-centric. People drive to work when it's walking distance, park anywhere they like ignoring rules, it's obvious that there is much more of a default to using cars.