If weak rumours are true, we could spend £300m this window.
and Liverpool will spend less net than Burnley.
If weak rumours are true, we could spend £300m this window.
I hope they have a plan then because I'm 99% certain that Konate will go (I should caveat that by also saying that like most people on this forum, I was also 99% certain that we wouldnt sign WirtzI don't think it's a given that Konate will leave at the end of the season (there's been numerous reports lately that talks over his deal are progressing) but regardless, I don't see Guehi being first choice even in the longer term. If the club saw him as somebody that was a first choice CB, whether now or in 12 months, then the deal would have been done by now. Instead it looks like he's seen as a relatively cheap, versatile CB that doesn't take up a non homegrown spot in the squad.
I suspect we'll be signing 2 CB's in the next 12 months, 3 if Konate ends up leaving. They'll have their targets. Guehi though just looks and feels like a cheap, reliable option as one of four CB's, with the added bonus that he's homegrown and can cover both sides. He's a steady eddy that may allow you to bring in a bit of a gamble/project player that you want to ease into the side as the long term starting CB.I hope they have a plan then because I'm 99% certain that Konate will go (I should caveat that by also saying that like most people on this forum, I was also 99% certain that we wouldnt sign Wirtz), if not this transfer window, then at the end of the season so if Guehi isnt intended to be the replacement first choice then I hope they have someone in mind to be.
If that is indeed the case, then I have to change my earlier post, if he wouldnt be coming to be a first choice CB then I dont think he will come. Probably better to remain at Palace as club captain and play every game possible this season than come and be a side choice rather than a first choice.I suspect we'll be signing 2 CB's in the next 12 months, 3 if Konate ends up leaving. They'll have their targets. Guehi though just looks and feels like a cheap, reliable option as one of four CB's, with the added bonus that he's homegrown and can cover both sides. He's a steady eddy that may allow you to bring in a bit of a gamble/project player that you want to ease into the side as the long term starting CB.
If that is indeed the case, then I have to change my earlier post, if he wouldnt be coming to be a first choice CB then I dont think he will come. Probably better to remain at Palace as club captain and play every game possible this season than come and be a side choice rather than a first choice.
Just think if you hadn’t ****** around with Ekitike, you might have had Isak by now, it’s like you haven’t learned a thingI see rumours of Liverpool being in for Wissa![]()
Just think if you hadn’t ****** around with Isak, you might have had another striker by now, it’s like you haven’t learned a thingJust think if you hadn’t ****** around with Ekitike, you might have had Isak by now, it’s like you haven’t learned a thing
We still Isak and his attitude will be sorted in time for the champions league, and you will still have the second choice and he knows itJust think if you hadn’t ****** around with Isak, you might have had another striker by now, it’s like you haven’t learned a thing
I'd be pretty happy with that. Ekitike deserves a chance to be first choice. We also have goals available from Gakpo, Wirtz, Salah, possibly Frimpong, and hopefully more from Szoboszlai this year. It makes sense to my mind to spend less on a striker, to bring in someone who is proven to score in the PL but won't mind working off the bench, and to bolster the midfield and defence. My preference would be Mateta, but I'd be really happy with Wissa. The Isak transfer seems like a potentially disruptive and very expensive market opportunity and I don't think is in the squad's best interests.I see rumours of Liverpool being in for Wissa![]()
We still Isak and his attitude will be sorted in time for the champions league, and you will still have the second choice and he knows it
There is zero chance any team sells their only striker before getting replacements.Just think if you hadn’t ****** around with Isak, you might have had another striker by now, it’s like you haven’t learned a thing
he plays for Leicester, 1 season in the prem - 2g/3a in 32 gamesNo idea who this is and at work so can’t YouTube’s.
But we do need a CAM
There is zero chance any team sells their only striker before getting replacements.
He can stay and we can fine him over and over for not sticking to his contractual obligations.Whilst I tend to agree on the whole, I wouldn't say zero or any. I'd say ideally and Newcastle certainly aren't dealing with ideally at the moment.
What happens if Isak sticks to his plan of never kicking another ball for Newcastle? Sell him in January anyway?
Newcastle will be able to buy replacements and somewhere down the line a club is going to be left short.