- Joined
- 11 Aug 2025
- Posts
- 15
- Location
- Germany
Do I really need a 9800x3d? Probably not. But people always want to drive a Bentley instead of a Mini Cooper because they think the Bentley is better, but the truth is, both will get you where you want to go.
I've been thinking every day for a month now that I really don't need a high-end PC to play games. Whether it's WQHD or 4K, both are great. I played on consoles from the 70s and 80s, and they were just square pixels, but it was incredibly fun.
So it's better to buy a cheaper CPU and invest in a better GPU. It's not a bad idea as long as it doesn't have a negative impact on gaming, so why not?
I tend to play new games, and occasionally old ones. One of the main reasons for building a PC is that I really want to play Star Citizen. Unfortunately, this game isn't available on consoles, but even if it were, I want to get away from consoles. I have a PS5 and an Xbox SX, so in terms of performance, they can't even come close to the PC. The FPS drops and the stuttering alone are driving me crazy. I regret the purchase.
What the hardware market is doing to us is almost bordering on a crime, but we gamers only have ourselves to blame for that. We buy everything from them, no matter the price, at least the majority of the gaming community does.
The RTX 5090 costs €2,230 here for the cheapest version, which is a lot of money, and I don't think this GPU is worth it. I think NVIDIA is building on its DLSS, FG, and ray tracing, which is all well and good, but what they're doing is also beyond normal.
I would be happy with an AMD GPU that really kicks NVIDIA's ass; with the RX 9070XT, they're on the right track.
I hope they release it this year, but I don't think so. If there were more solid news from AMD, I could wait, but I have the feeling they'll drop a bomb this year or next, and it'll hit directly on... I love money, NVIDIA.
I've been thinking every day for a month now that I really don't need a high-end PC to play games. Whether it's WQHD or 4K, both are great. I played on consoles from the 70s and 80s, and they were just square pixels, but it was incredibly fun.
So it's better to buy a cheaper CPU and invest in a better GPU. It's not a bad idea as long as it doesn't have a negative impact on gaming, so why not?
I tend to play new games, and occasionally old ones. One of the main reasons for building a PC is that I really want to play Star Citizen. Unfortunately, this game isn't available on consoles, but even if it were, I want to get away from consoles. I have a PS5 and an Xbox SX, so in terms of performance, they can't even come close to the PC. The FPS drops and the stuttering alone are driving me crazy. I regret the purchase.
What the hardware market is doing to us is almost bordering on a crime, but we gamers only have ourselves to blame for that. We buy everything from them, no matter the price, at least the majority of the gaming community does.
The RTX 5090 costs €2,230 here for the cheapest version, which is a lot of money, and I don't think this GPU is worth it. I think NVIDIA is building on its DLSS, FG, and ray tracing, which is all well and good, but what they're doing is also beyond normal.
I would be happy with an AMD GPU that really kicks NVIDIA's ass; with the RX 9070XT, they're on the right track.
I hope they release it this year, but I don't think so. If there were more solid news from AMD, I could wait, but I have the feeling they'll drop a bomb this year or next, and it'll hit directly on... I love money, NVIDIA.