Monica GalettiMichel Roux was always good on MC The Professionals - can't remember who he used to be partnered with though, it's been so long.
Acvording to AI the person he presented with back when I watched was, ahem, Greg WallaceMonica Galetti
He might have been on it, but I don't remember him. MR Jnr and Monica are the only ones that stand out to me.Acvording to AI the person he presented with back when I watched was, ahem, Greg Wallace![]()
SameHe might have been on it, but I don't remember him. MR Jnr and Monica are the only ones that stand out to me.
i'm pretty sure it's not all nonsense dude. while the most serious crimes may well have been dismissed, there's still clear evidence Gregg was a bit of a wrong un when it came to his interactions with the ladies. would you want him alone with any of your female family members, i know i'd not.It's nonsense, the most serious claims were dismissed
They were not dismissed they were unsubstantiated - basically no witnesses. And stripping in front of people is not just a issue for people with progressive and politically correct perspective. It was not just risqué jokes - which is the bedrock of so much UK comedy.I don't mind him, it's the usual rubbish you find when you investigate anything that's male dominated from lens of the progressive and politically correct perspective.
It's nonsense, the most serious claims were dismissed. Apparently the other guy sang along to a song and repeated the N word. Oh, the horror!!
People need to grow up.
No witnesses and no evidence.They were not dismissed they were unsubstantiated - basically no witnesses. And stripping in front of people is not just a issue for people with progressive and politically correct perspective. It was not just risqué jokes - which is the bedrock of so much UK comedy.
Most of the substantiated allegations related to inappropriate sexual language and humour. An overview of the report, however, said a “smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated”.
“It’s just banter” is the kind of thing that only absolute bellends say.No witnesses and no evidence.
So all he's been found guilty of officially is probably just banter, which some women found upsetting. Without knowing exactly what was said and the context, I reserve judgement. I don't trust these kind of investigations.
Is it possible for you to disagree without insulting people? Pathetic, but it's the standard I expect from this forum.“It’s just banter” is the kind of thing that only absolute bellends say.
It’s just banter, calm down.Is it possible for you to disagree without insulting people? Pathetic, but it's the standard I expect from this forum.
"smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated”. is not banter.No witnesses and no evidence.
So all he's been found guilty of officially is probably just banter, which some women found upsetting. Without knowing exactly what was said and the context, I reserve judgement. I don't trust these kind of investigations.
It’s just banter, calm down.
Funny how it’s different when you’re on the receiving end. Weird how that works.Rubbish, nothing about this interaction would qualify as banter. Using it an an excuse to throw in an insult is just pathetic.
Does TV attract exhibitionists?And stripping in front of people is not just a issue for people with progressive and politically correct perspective.
John Barrowman.that guy who sometimes is American, other times Scottish (Torchwood?)