Amorim is a confused mix of emotions. At the pitchside he is the opposite of emotional, I haven't noticed him remonstrating with officials in an overt fashion, you'd consider him low key in comparison to many others. Even when utd score, you don't see mad running up and down the line or an outburst, in fact it often doesn't register in an external fashion.
The other thing that confuses my thoughts on him, is that he is eminently immediately more affable and engaging than ten hag ever was, he is a manager that you want to do well not just because he is a utd manager, but because he seems a decent sort.
Also more often than not, I watched a Ten Hag post match interview and was at a complete loss as to what match Ten hag had been watching, because his comments afterwards bore no resemblance to the poor performance. I want a manager that, within reason, calls it as it is and doesn't make up some fairytale.
I wonder does this feeling on Amorim not extend to how the players view him. Virtually all successful managers were successful because the players wanted to please the manager and desperately did not want to disappoint him.