I hated doing plans, too rigid for real life when you don't know when or how long you will have.
Totally with you on this! Kinda why I race and TTT instead. Mixes things up, keeps me flexible/reactive to read races and therefore far more engaged & entertained. Also less of an issue if you miss days/sessions... Like now - hit a bit of a 'slump' after weather changed a month ago meant I missed some longer weekend rides. Other life stuffs going on, a touch of illness 2 weeks ago, so I had a reduction in mileage/base, then took things a bit easier when I could ride, other fatigue & time being priority for a little while (decorating spare room & building furniture)... But because I'm used to being fairly flexible and ad-hoc ZRL last week got an FTP bump!
Yeah im pretty certain that my only previous exercise experience being lifting weights helps me over achieve at FTP ramp tests. Interestingly though my peak FTP 253w was achieved doing "the grade" route in zwift, after my firmware update i only managed a 243 FTP in a ramp test, so if my 20-45w drop is right that just supports further that i overachieve in ramp tests to have only lost 10w on ftp.
Ramp test will usually over-read, especially for someone like yourself who can likely 'peak' power, just not sustain it... Either figure out how much to drop the FTP value (-10% -15%)... I usually found doing a ramp test the day after a pretty hard ride it would be more accurate, but a 20/40min test I'd usually need to do fairly fresh/rested for the same result.
Consider accuracy, don't be 'disheartened' to lose FTP when you're 'more trained'. You have to trust the trainers accuracy as you can't verify it. Yes it might be the trainer, but it could equally just be a bad day! Spindowns and 'feel' while regularly riding are the only ways you can notice your trainer playing up, like as you have after the Firmware update - but even if it's 'reading low' you need it accurate and consistent - no point comparing apples to oranges.
If you're judging your trainer accuracy over your FTP results months apart then you're really not going to achieve much - or be able to progress. It's swings and roundabouts, some days you'll be flying but test low, others you'll feel slow and test high. So without another way to verify trainer accuracy you might be best to do a few more tests and average it out. Control your variables (humidity, temperature and airflow will all impact the trainer). So do a good warmup and a spindown before a test. As for how to 'get back' do some regular longer varied sustained efforts and use those (with something like intervals.icu set your FTP a bit low and then let it push your calculated back FTP up).
If you're doing 20 minute tests and want to test better, focus on 10-15 minute efforts. You can 'train' a better FTP result, if that is what you're after. If you're doing longer tests for a more sustained FTP for something like Tri/IM then focus on O/U and Sweetspot. If you're after an 'easy' measure for FTP which you can repeat weekly around other training without carrying a bunch of fatigue then the Ramp Test. But you have to trust your equipment and control your variables. If you're getting stressed about 'losing 10-20w' from 2 isolated FTP tests months apart (with a firmware update between) and having an accurate figure is important to you, then do more of them, you'll have a 'good day' at some point!
I 'lost' around 60-80w FTP with trainer issues, lots of equipment messing around thrown in over months of 'hassle'. My actual power loss was probably more 'mindset' from that knowing my trainer 'bump' in power was false and that my trainer was playing up. Once I'd got things accurate again, reset at that low FTP, sucked it up as my new normal and built back up. I had to build that trust back into my equipment. The realisation was that I was probably never going to get near 300W like Imy trainer was telling me before - as I'm not structured enough to do those longer efforts, but getting to the point of consistently holding 255-265W over months+seasons I'm more happy. I certainly have times (like now) where I'm struggling a bit for form, while switching from more outdoor 'endurance' miles to getting my 'race legs' back. I'd expect an FTP test to be low - even with my FTP boost in a race last week to 263W my 'actual' for an hour long effort would be below 250W as I'm in a bit of a slump form wise to be able to sustain that type of effort (as I don't do much over 10min).
I don't think I'd ever pay full price for one and I always thought i'd only ever get it if I were to buy the Kickr bike which it's built into.
There is one local to me for sale for £260 and I thought I'd throw in a, admittedly lowball, offer of £200 and see what they come back with.
I do like the idea of actually feeling a bit of gradient on the trainer as opposed to just feeling like I'm grinding big gears/headwind but I just can't work out if it's as good as what I think it would be like in my mind. Sort of like how I thought the Headwind's speed function would be incredible but in a practical sense, it was useless
In my opinion... They're a gadget to mix up your general riding, really if you're doing enough of it to be utterly bored sat there, that some changes in gradient have a big impact to you (like doing many hour long IM/endurance training) then get one. So really think users have to ride a lot more to really 'benefit' from a Climb - as consider the specifics of it - it altering the gradient of your bike, so you can train more effectivley at those different grades. For 'free riding' and racing around general stuff on Zwift/etc they're a gimmick really nothing more - you don't gain really anything from it except some feel of movement. You've got to be riding enough sustained gradients to focus training/build specific muscle groups for it with something like the Climb (like seated 10% climbing alpine ascents) to really 'benefit' training from it.
I think the belt on them can wear out and slip, so second hand they're not without their niggles and can be 'something extra to go wrong'. I was pretty close to getting one last winter for the fun side of it, but it would also open the option of ditching my front wheel to use elsewhere, I'd gain some space to get closer to my screen/fans and better airflow. There's far better things to spend £200+ to make your riding more enjoyable than a Climb. Some indoor specific shorts/tops/shoes. A quality fan. Some other accessories. Bigger TV. A rocker plate. Some decent headphones. I would argue they all add more to your indoor riding!
Although my gears seem to not work well apart from the 2-3 that I've always used so that's something to look at after, even with limit screw maxed out it shifts too far
What's the derailleur - likely needs a spacer on the cassette if it's doing that when on the same cassette on a wheel it's ok.