Imgur has blocked the UK

At this time I see little ill effects from the current legislation on the statute books and some good.

There is a lot of potential for harm with the current implementation ranging from identity theft, fraud, reputational damage through to access to educational information on sensitive subjects like self-harm and so on and potentially more serious where people who for example come from countries or religions with repressive views on things like homosexuality with potentially deadly consequences could be exposed.

That isn't touching on the unintended consequences - within a generation people including children will likely be trivially circumventing it leading to attempts to double down with likely legislation against VPNs, etc. which then motivates the development of "super TOR" like systems which there isn't the incentive and audience to make a reality currently which will be a nightmare for law enforcement leading to calls to lock the internet down further...

Meanwhile little has actually been accomplished to protect children.

Sometimes it is better to let sleeping dogs lie for want of a better way to put it and find other approaches albeit I have severe doubts that protecting children has much to do with the real aims of this part of the legislation.
 
Last edited:
It's been pointed out to you a numerous times, including myself, Medialab decided to geo-block the UK from Imgur due to issues around GDPR - the rumour is that Imgur didn't check for age verification upon user signups.
And as i'm sure you're well aware, GDPR predates this government.


Outside of parental controls, which tend to be opt-in/out and are easily disabled, are you suggesting there are UK ISPs actively blocking VPN protocols (across their entire networks)? If so, have got a list of these ISPs?

No I meant it's part of parental controls now, which pretty much all turn on by default :/

There is a lot of potential for harm with the current implementation ranging from identity theft, fraud, reputational damage through to access to educational information on sensitive subjects like self-harm and so on and potentially more serious where people who for example come from countries or religions with repressive views on things like homosexuality with potentially deadly consequences could be exposed.

That isn't touching on the unintended consequences - within a generation people including children will likely be trivially circumventing it leading to attempts to double down with likely legislation against VPNs, etc. which then motivates the development of "super TOR" like systems which there isn't the incentive and audience to make a reality currently which will be a nightmare for law enforcement leading to calls to lock the internet down further...

Meanwhile little has actually been accomplished to protect children.

Sometimes it is better to let sleeping dogs lie for want of a better way to put it and find other approaches albeit I have severe doubts that protecting children has much to do with the real aims of this part of the legislation.

We've already seen a data breach thanks to it (discord). People had their photos and details stolen.
 
Last edited:
It's true!!! Had to use a VPN

.
ufsKykz.jpg
 
Just wish I knew which new hosting site to choose, which is as good or better!
In terms of embedding images on the forum, try imgbox.com. Even before the Imgur block, some of us here in the past have been using imgbox instead just fine, according to when I searched 'imgbox' on the forum anyway. Haven't seen any complaints about it and I've been using it recently too.

It's free, has a 10MB max file size limit and they claim to host your images forever unless you delete them. Fairly simple to use too.
 
Last edited:
In terms of embedding images on the forum, try imgbox.com. Even before the Imgur block, some of us here in the past have been using imgbox instead just fine, according to when I searched 'imgbox' on the forum anyway. Haven't seen any complaints about it and I've been using it recently too.

It's free, has a 10MB max file size limit and they claim to host your images forever unless you delete them. Fairly simple to use too.


Thanks... It looks good


.
 
Last edited:
I don't blame somebody not wanting to sift through a very long thread.

Personally think there should be a pinned thread or something on the forum about alternatives. Saves people asking all the time.
 
I don't blame somebody not wanting to sift through a very long thread.

Personally think there should be a pinned thread or something on the forum about alternatives. Saves people asking all the time.

But how will people get their post count up, and feel like they've contributed to the discussion!?
 
Just realised there are already some suggestions in a pinned thread:


The list in that post is ought to be updated though.
 
Last edited:
age checks to view memes essentially.... they didnt want to implement it.
There is questionable NSFW content on Imgur, even after they changed their TOS stating they would remove such content. So you're opinion it's purely "age checks to view memes essentially" isn't entirely correct.

And, re-reading the ICO statement (HERE), it does appear this investigation leaned more towards GDPR, children's data, rather than the OSA (OSA is the "think of children" act, not GDPR) -
The investigation relates to how MediaLab’s Imgur social media platform uses children’s information and its approach to age assurance.

but you think thats their problem, not your government being utterly retarded PROTECT THE CHILDREN BAN THE MEMES ignore the real dangers because they are multi billion dollar companies backed by AMERICA
Again, it wasn't the UK that blocked the Imgur.
On the conclusion of the ICO's investigation and the potential of a fine, Medialab lab decided to 'nip this in the bud' and geo block the UK rather than work to apply the appropriate measures to their platform. That was their (Medialab's) choice, no one else's.
And given they're an American company with (i don't believe) zero presence in the UK, i'm sure they could have told the ICO/UK to take a hike and left it to them to deal with.

FYI, geo blocks due GDPR aren't a new thing, plenty of websites are doing it - like the www.nydailynews.com.


No I meant it's part of parental controls now, which pretty much all turn on by default :/
Do you know of any ISP's that are implementing VPN protocol blocking within their parental controls?
Personally i haven't come across this other than the blocking of commercial VPN provider websites/IP ranges, Three did this with PIA a few years back.

Opting out of parental controls is trivial though and there's still plenty of ISP's that don't have parental controls on as standard.
 
There is questionable NSFW content on Imgur, even after they changed their TOS stating they would remove such content. So you're opinion it's purely "age checks to view memes essentially" isn't entirely correct.

And, re-reading the ICO statement (HERE), it does appear this investigation leaned more towards GDPR, children's data, rather than the OSA (OSA is the "think of children" act, not GDPR) -



Again, it wasn't the UK that blocked the Imgur.
On the conclusion of the ICO's investigation and the potential of a fine, Medialab lab decided to 'nip this in the bud' and geo block the UK rather than work to apply the appropriate measures to their platform. That was their (Medialab's) choice, no one else's.
And given they're an American company with (i don't believe) zero presence in the UK, i'm sure they could have told the ICO/UK to take a hike and left it to them to deal with.

FYI, geo blocks due GDPR aren't a new thing, plenty of websites are doing it - like the www.nydailynews.com.



Do you know of any ISP's that are implementing VPN protocol blocking within their parental controls?
Personally i haven't come across this other than the blocking of commercial VPN provider websites/IP ranges, Three did this with PIA a few years back.

Opting out of parental controls is trivial though and there's still plenty of ISP's that don't have parental controls on as standard.

Vodafone and BT are doing it for broadband. I've come across it on phone networks as well. Though it's flakey and doesn't catch all of them and likely never will. VPNs have got quite good at disguising their traffic as well and sending it along ports which can't be blocked without breaking everything.
 
Last edited:
There is questionable NSFW content on Imgur, even after they changed their TOS stating they would remove such content. So you're opinion it's purely "age checks to view memes essentially" isn't entirely correct.
even if that were true why did imgur get singled out and when a dozen hosts doing the same thing we can still access without a free vpn

all it did was push people to other sites. or vpns.
 
Last edited:
even if that were true why did imgur get singled out and when a dozen hosts doing the same thing we can still access without a free vpn

all it did was push people to other sites. or vpns.
The case against imgur was GDPR related, something to do with keeping details of minors, nothing to do with their content.
 
The case against imgur was GDPR related, something to do with keeping details of minors, nothing to do with their content.
the others aren't really either? its like piracy all over again where they blocked a few big name sites but others were still easily accessible.

probably still the case now, it makes it seem like they are doing something but its just an inconvenience
 
Last edited:
even if that were true why did imgur get singled out and when a dozen hosts doing the same thing we can still access without a free vpn

all it did was push people to other sites. or vpns.
What's your source and evidence that Imgur/Medialab were "singled out"?

Again, this doesn't appear to be OSA (Online Safety Act) related which is where various sites (predominately porn sites) were required to implement age verification for UK internet users that in turned caused the massive increase in VPN usage. Again with Imgur/Medialab, this appears to be the result of GDPR and imo, i would be surprised if there's many UK users purposely using VPN services to browse and use Imgur.

the others aren't really either? its like piracy all over again where they blocked a few big name sites but others were still easily accessible.

probably still the case now, it makes it seem like they are doing something but its just an inconvenience
Who are "the others" and what does piracy have to do with this?

To be honest, it seems you're conflating a lot of things and struggling to grasp the differences between ISP blocking of websites (like piracy websites) and private companies/businesses implementing geo(graphical) blocks of countries on their website/services (like in this case with Imgur/Medialab) as well as the differences between the OSA (this is the "think of the children" act) and GDPR.
I'd strongly recommend reading up on all of this because at the moment, your replies read like the incoherent hysterical ramblings of someone out on day release that has been told to let loose and dribble their conspiracies across a keyboard.
 
Last edited:
To be honest, it seems you're conflating a lot of things and struggling to grasp the differences between ISP blocking of websites (like piracy websites) and private companies/businesses implementing geo(graphical) blocks of countries on their website/services (like in this case with Imgur/Medialab) as well as the differences between the OSA (this is the "think of the children" act) and GDPR.
I'd strongly recommend reading up on all of this because at the moment, your replies read like the incoherent hysterical ramblings of someone out on day release that has been told to let loose and dribble their conspiracies across a keyboard.
..... gov makes rules, companies dont want to agree with essentially is no different to just banning them.

they are not applying this crap equally, someone is lobbying for it against specific targets exactly like they did with piracy.
 
Back
Top Bottom