Forza Horizon 4 Bench Thread

TNA · 9 Oct 2018 at 07:04

Tommy_Here said:
2160p
Titan Xp 2000/3152
4790k @ 4.7ghz
416.16 Drivers.

Was expecting a bigger gain between me and some of the other cards re-ran a few times different drivers couldn't break 64fps.

1440p & 1080p pointless as GPU usage was 85% at 62% respectively...think my next upgrade is a new CPU and Mobo finally retire my 4790k

I am not surprised with the results as they are in line with what gamers nexus said in his review of the Titan Xp vs Titan X Pascal. I used to think there was at least 10% difference between the two, but in majority of titles it is closer to 5% it seems.

I would not be worried though, your score is so close to a 2080Ti which costs at least twice what you paid for your Titan Xp

I agree with CPU and Mobo being the next upgrades. I am waiting for both Zen 2 on 7nm and Intel 10nm and I will likely pick one of those up. Though playing at 4K, I am not sure if it will make much difference to fps. But it will have been 6+ years on Haswell for me by the time those come out, so nice to get something fresh

HoneyBadger · 9 Oct 2018 at 12:18

Here's mine with the latest drivers.

hyperseven · 9 Oct 2018 at 12:24

HoneyBadger said:
Here's mine with the latest drivers.

Incorrect bench settings fella. Custom settings are used you will find them under a spoiler tag thing on the first page

Tommy_Here · 9 Oct 2018 at 13:24

TNA said:
I am not surprised with the results as they are in line with what gamers nexus said in his review of the Titan Xp vs Titan X Pascal. I used to think there was at least 10% difference between the two, but in majority of titles it is closer to 5% it seems.

I would not be worried though, your score is so close to a 2080Ti which costs at least twice what you paid for your Titan Xp

I agree with CPU and Mobo being the next upgrades. I am waiting for both Zen 2 on 7nm and Intel 10nm and I will likely pick one of those up. Though playing at 4K, I am not sure if it will make much difference to fps. But it will have been 6+ years on Haswell for me by the time those come out, so nice to get something fresh

Compared to my 1080 Ti it's approximately 10-15% faster though the Ti wasn't the best clocker. I think it varies from benchmark to benchmark between the X Pascal and xp like in gears of war mine is roughly 12% faster iirc will have a look when I get home

I think we've both done well on the prices however! Especially when the 2080 Ti isn't miles faster! The Gp102 is most definitely a 4k 60 capable gpu

TNA · 9 Oct 2018 at 14:21

Tommy_Here said:
Compared to my 1080 Ti it's approximately 10-15% faster though the Ti wasn't the best clocker. I think it varies from benchmark to benchmark between the X Pascal and xp like in gears of war mine is roughly 12% faster iirc will have a look when I get home

I think we've both done well on the prices however! Especially when the 2080 Ti isn't miles faster! The Gp102 is most definitely a 4k 60 capable gpu

HoneyBadger · 9 Oct 2018 at 17:40

Oppps! Thanks for the heads up. I'll have a gander and some point and re-do it.

Defconluke · 15 Oct 2018 at 17:31

1080P
980TI @ Stock - Afterburner wasn't working for me but GPUZ sensor log has core boosting to 1189-1202MHz and memory rock solid at 1752
4670K @ 4.2 (Got a 4790K on its was as an upgrade that was too cheap to pass up)
411.70 Drivers

Kaapstad · 15 Oct 2018 at 19:18

Scoreboard updated.

PiKe · 20 Oct 2018 at 21:32

Is a 1050ti enough for 60fps at high?

bru · 21 Oct 2018 at 01:59

PiKe said:
Is a 1050ti enough for 60fps at high?

Probably do alright I would think, with enough tweaking of settings.

Freddie1980 · 21 Oct 2018 at 21:17

PiKe said:
Is a 1050ti enough for 60fps at high?

With a 2500k? From some of the benchmarks that's been posted this game benefits from having more then 4 physical cores, with a O/C'd 8700K a 1050ti can run over 70fps on medium so hitting 60 at high shouldn't be to much of a stretch but again your CPU will come into play.

ShiWarrior · 5 Nov 2018 at 19:00

1080P
Radeon RX580 @1350/2000
i5 6600K @3500
18.10.2 drivers

Kaapstad · 6 Nov 2018 at 14:11

Scoreboard updated.

Vexr · 6 Nov 2018 at 19:56

1080p
GeForce GTX 970 @ 1496/3920
FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
416.34 Driver

3440x1440
GeForce GTX 970 @ 1496/3920
FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
416.34 Driver

Ouch

Kaapstad · 7 Nov 2018 at 11:01

Scoreboard updated.

PiKe · 17 Nov 2018 at 19:30

1920x1080
EVGA 1060 3GB @ Stock
16GB Crucial Tracer @ 1600mhz
i5 2500k @ 4.4Ghz
416.81 Driver

Interesting performance issues after running the benchmark on Ultra, I lose 10 frames per second average if I switch to High and then run it again, if I restart the game, it averages over 70fps. Invalid result for the thread but here it is anyway.

Happy enough to be able to run it at high with vsync at 60fps.

Kaapstad · 17 Nov 2018 at 21:07

Scoreboard updated.

PiKe · 17 Nov 2018 at 21:11

How is @Arron17 970 so much better then the others? Are you running tweaks in the nvcpl?

ShiWarrior · 17 Nov 2018 at 21:15

PiKe said:
How is @Arron17 970 so much better then the others? Are you running tweaks in the nvcpl?

to me, its his CPU @ 4.2

i got around that with my cpu @ 3.5

EDIT //

Hmm actually his GPU looks overclocked, maybe on water?

Kaapstad · 17 Nov 2018 at 21:34

PiKe said:
How is @Arron17 970 so much better then the others? Are you running tweaks in the nvcpl?

I have checked his results screenshot and the settings look right.

@Arron17 Could you double check and re run if possible please as the score is quite high for a 970.

Thanks.