They aren't... That's the point they're making...then why buy it ?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
They aren't... That's the point they're making...then why buy it ?
They aren't... That's the point they're making...
You need to read it again. They didn't say they've bought it. They specifically said they're skipping it. Their point is that the 2080 offers the same performance as the 1080ti at the same price, 2 years after the 1080ti released.If you look at my previous recent posts in this thread, I was responding to the guy that did actually buy, admitting that he was getting nothing extra and its a fail. My question was why buy it then, you know what you're buying before hand. Everyone does, they read, they investigate, the make a decision, its not like the RTX haters were silent either.
You need to read it again. They didn't day they've bought it. They specifically said they're skipping it. Their point is that the 2080 offers the same performance as the 1080ti at the same price, 2 years after the 1080ti released.
Anything beyond that is stuff you're imagining
Add also the DLSS blurring and we have a fail?
Ooops no. Nvidia says it will take time for the AI to be trained to use DLSS effectively to remove the blur....
Ah they had to add that caveat. When they first announced dlss it was the easiest thing ever, "yeah we run it through our supercomputer and bobs your uncle". Now it has to learn which could mean multiple attempts to get it right.
The pricing is obscene now and at this rate a lot of pc gamers will be priced out the market.
DLSS is getting a lot of bad feedback, A killer feature labed up wrong by Nvidia. We was all led to believe "Me included" That DLSS would allow you to upscale an image at say 1440p or 1800p and get a 4k image without loss to quality and gain performance.
All I am seeing here is the poor effect you get when running VSR at a none native resolution "BLURRR" It looks worst than the worst AA FXAA
I agree with this Tweet!
Ryan Smith @RyanSmithAT
The more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that NVIDIA went about DLSS the wrong way. Rather than pitching it as an image upscaling routine to allow for better perf, they should have pitched DLSS 2X, the image quality enhancing version, as the default mode
Oh that's ridiculous, there's a card for every budget. I could very happily game on an RX 580 for £179.99 or if I was feeling very extravagant, stretch to a Vega 56 for £299.99. I dont see anything wrong with graphics card prices. It's only the very best has gotten expensive but I've always ignored that end of the market anyway just like when I'm buying a pair of jeans or a new watch.
There are moments where it looks amazing, like the stuff outside the train, moments when it actually hinders things and it makes it too dark, and moments when it's hard to notice any difference without a side by side. It looks like devs can't just turn it on and let it do its thing because sometimes it'll mess with how they wanted the game to look, or at least they can't whilst they're still having to implement rasterization as well.