Soldato
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
i'd say change the curve for benchmarking purposes, the cooler the hardware the better for sustained higher boost clocks, don't worry about it being loud.
For everyday stuff and gaming the stock fan curve will be plenty, and yes msi afterburner is by far the best gpu utility for overclocking and setting up custom fan profiles
i run full custom watercooling in my rig and have noctua nf-a12 fans which are really quite at any rpm i set upto 1600rpm, i set 1600 as thats the best spot I've found for cooling vs noise under heavy load senario's, otherwise in games and windows between 1000-1250rpm is the norm
Scoreboard updated.
Cheers Guest2. What do you mean by throttle down? Do you mean downclock? Because this is something I have noticed if I have my case fans on vs off.
And also if I manually whack the GPU fan to 100% it does make a difference to the score it seems since the GPU is downclocking on the fly as the GPU gets hotter it seems...
Ive only just noticed this now!
Regarding the graph above, any reason why this particular profile? Doesnt seem overally different to the default?
Also how does one access the default GPU profile? Presumably MSI wont show this and its somehow programmed into the bios?
Cheers wookiee87. Yes Im beginning to see that having your rig on max cooling yields best results in Heaven, but I dont see any difference in 3dmark weirdly enough.
I need to look at my the fans on my GPU via the Corsair H100i later.
Cheers for this Kaapstad!
Im up for that
What res is 1440p exactly? 3440 x 1440? I cant see this selection....
Cheers Guest2. What do you mean by throttle down? Do you mean downclock? Because this is something I have noticed if I have my case fans on vs off.
And also if I manually whack the GPU fan to 100% it does make a difference to the score it seems since the GPU is downclocking on the fly as the GPU gets hotter it seems...
Ive only just noticed this now!
Regarding the graph above, any reason why this particular profile? Doesnt seem overally different to the default?
Also how does one access the default GPU profile? Presumably MSI wont show this and its somehow programmed into the bios?
2560 x 1440, if your screen supports it
3dmark is a combination of factors tbh, its very hard to increase scores if you post a high one to begin with, when my new ripped cl14 kits arrive I'm going to take one final shot at 1080p and 1440p heaven and 3dmark, the low latency of the ram will help no end, i have cl18 atm and it's utter poo, cant drop timings or bump up speed without pc not posting
Yep, it means the GPU will automatically downclock if it gets too hot. Sometimes this will cause it to drop way under normal load clocks, which results in the ~10fps Heaven benchmark minimum fps score.
The graph above is just a custom one i found worked best with my 1080Ti and kept it the same. To use the default one, you just turn off 'enable user defined software automatic fan control'
With my card, the steppings are in 15Mhz increments. I expect all 2080Ti's are the same. With +165Mhz on core I see the following
<60c - 2070Mhz
<65c - 2055Mhz
<70c - 2040Mhz
<75c - 2025Mhz
<80c - 2010Mhz
<85c - 1995Mhz
Try Heaven 4 on windowed mode and watch the results, like so. Note the Max 2070Mhz when it was 48c, then gradually dropping down in 15Mhz stages.
It will not be like this for every card, some will be better than others, some will be absolute donkeys. I've had both types over the years. I think the card I have now is about average in terms of overclock ability. The more expensive card like FTW3 and Kingpin have better cooling - 3 fans, water, or hybrid and Kingpin EVGA card they save/find the ones with good memory and core chip that clocks well and charge more money for them.
Interestinlgy when monitoring you will see things like drop in GPU usage to 73%, this resulted in the fan speed dropping from 100% to 98% which then had the knock on effect of the temp raising to 81c and core clock dropping to 1995Mhz. Notice the tiny blips on the line line
Um... I forget about RAM timings etc, with CL the lower the better right?
I got this stuff coming in tomorrow for me: https://www.corsair.com/uk/en/Categ...emory-Kit/p/CML32GX3M4A1600C10#tab-tech-specs
Any good?
(DDR3 is necessary since I am using an LGA1150 board).
Just another question, do you guys max out "Power Limit (%) and Temp Limit (C)" on Afterburner?
Sweet cheers wookie87!
How do you know if the sticks (which I mentioned above) are CL9 or 10?
In one part of the spec it says 9-9-9-24 and another it says 10-10-10-27.
I guess the first numbers are achieved by enabling XMP?
Question is whats better, tighter timings or faster frequency....
ideally best speed and lowest timings, but it can be difficult in achieving this, and the slightest change can affect you overall score or performance, with your kit you won't notice anything tbh the difference between 9 and 10 is so marginal that i'd set 1600mhz at cl10, (ram speed will help) and call it a day
What do RAM timings look like now? This is RAM from ~8 years ago
I see the max bandwidth and DRAM frequency is much higher on that RAM, but the CAS timings are also much higher. Arent lower CAS timings better than higher?
It has been years but remember farting around for some time to get it stable at 9-9-9-27 mainly with the 1.5 V. Quite sure the default timings were not great out the box
my cl18 kit is pretty bad tbf, that's why i have a new much faster set arriving, 3600mhz @ 14/15/15/35 coupled with ryzen it should scream through benchmarks hopefully , no matter what i do with my current kit of ram, my pc will not boot if i change the timings in any direction could be down to the manufacture hynix, they do make some awful stuff, not always but on my occasion they did