*** Microsoft Windows 11 Thoughts & Discussion Thread ***
- Thread starter Deleted member 77746
- Start date
Maybe with a hardware TPM, but not at the moment it seems with a cpu tpm - my virtualbox Win 11 install does not recognise the cpu tpm on my 3700X
I have this feeling the CPU TPM will be hacked for gaming in due time. They always find a way.
Yes. A Gen 2 VM will allow you to enable TPM and Secure boot. Win11 in VMs is broken though (using Enhanced Mode)
I'm running Win11 in VMWare without issue, but don't think I will be moving to 11 anytime soon. The centred Start menu and softer looks don't bother me, I actually quite like the style in general, but I really don't like the dumbed down feel of the OS as a whole. The right click menus feel out of place to me, they feel like something ripped from a Linux distro.
Hello Sorry for intruding, but I need some advice does anyone know that if I buy a used TPM Module which is compatible with my motherboard and if it was not cleared or written back to an unused state if I connect the TPM Module to my motherboard can I use it or would it still be locked out or have I the ability to wipe it and start fresh. My M8 is selling one but he is looking £30 for it so before I buy it I would prefer to know before hand as I doubt I would be receiving a refund if it was locked and I had no way to access it. Any reply will be gravely appreciated and thank you to all who do in advance.
What is a gen 2 VM?
Don
Hyperv has a choice of emulated hardware gen1 Vs gen2
Think gen 2 drops support for older hardware but not 100% what hardware that is.
Associate
Windows 11 Insider Preview 22454.1000 (rs_prerelease)
AND
2021-09 Cumulative Update for Windows 11 for x64-based Systems (KB5005642)
AND
2021-09 Cumulative Update for Windows 11 for x64-based Systems (KB5005642)
Soldato
Guys - if I install 11 via the Insider Channel, will I need to do a further clean install when the 11RC or GM launches?
Associate
Write speeds fixed!
Get In...
Code:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 8.0.4 x64 (C) 2007-2021 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World: https://crystalmark.info/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes
[Read]
SEQ 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 2287.560 MB/s [ 2181.6 IOPS] < 3660.93 us>
SEQ 128KiB (Q= 32, T= 1): 0.000 MB/s [ 0.0 IOPS] < 0.00 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 0.000 MB/s [ 0.0 IOPS] < 0.00 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 0.000 MB/s [ 0.0 IOPS] < 0.00 us>
[Write]
SEQ 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 983.291 MB/s [ 937.7 IOPS] < 8500.46 us>
SEQ 128KiB (Q= 32, T= 1): 0.000 MB/s [ 0.0 IOPS] < 0.00 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 0.000 MB/s [ 0.0 IOPS] < 0.00 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 0.000 MB/s [ 0.0 IOPS] < 0.00 us>
Profile: Default
Test: 1 GiB (x5) [C: 31% (73/238GiB)]
Mode: [Admin]
Time: Measure 5 sec / Interval 5 sec
Date: 2021/09/09 20:31:41
OS: Windows 11 [10.0 Build 22454] (x64)
Man of Honour
Asus is doing some updates to older boards with older Intel 100 series + CPUs to support Windows 11 - Great news. Wonder if Gigabyte will follow suit.
https://www.pcgamer.com/uk/amp/asus...support-windows-11-on-unsupported-intel-cpus/
https://www.pcgamer.com/uk/amp/asus...support-windows-11-on-unsupported-intel-cpus/
Man of Honour
No wonder I missed that, it was on a previous page!
Associate
Here we go again.....
Code:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 8.0.4 x64 (C) 2007-2021 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World: https://crystalmark.info/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes
[Read]
SEQ 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 2217.782 MB/s [ 2115.0 IOPS] < 3778.27 us>
SEQ 128KiB (Q= 32, T= 1): 1774.254 MB/s [ 13536.5 IOPS] < 2360.26 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 262.171 MB/s [ 64006.6 IOPS] < 7953.27 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 34.427 MB/s [ 8405.0 IOPS] < 118.76 us>
[Write]
SEQ 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 245.974 MB/s [ 234.6 IOPS] < 33897.72 us>
SEQ 128KiB (Q= 32, T= 1): 243.211 MB/s [ 1855.6 IOPS] < 17184.45 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 228.857 MB/s [ 55873.3 IOPS] < 9096.92 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 95.243 MB/s [ 23252.7 IOPS] < 42.67 us>
Profile: Default
Test: 1 GiB (x5) [C: 29% (68/238GiB)]
Mode: [Admin]
Time: Measure 5 sec / Interval 5 sec
Date: 2021/09/10 9:22:17
OS: Windows 11 [10.0 Build 22454] (x64)
Permabanned
Nope.
Be nice if they took the time to get things like that right first, then iterated on it throughout the OS design :s
Instead we get more and more dumbed down implementations missing a well-rounded feature set then they rush on to the next "cool" feature which all too often is one no one actually asked for, wanted or have a need for.
Instead we get more and more dumbed down implementations missing a well-rounded feature set then they rush on to the next "cool" feature which all too often is one no one actually asked for, wanted or have a need for.