• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3D Mark 11 scores**

gregster said:
Sorry Kap :( I have been doing 10 things at once today or trying to and actually doing nothing :( Consider it done bud.
Click to expand...

No problems, with all the results I have posted in the last 24hrs its easy to miss one.

The one for a single GPU im quite proud of, over 11000 for half of a GTX 690.:D

I know I can not compete with the people with real GTX 680s or HD 7970s but im having some good fun. I must try the latest drivers soon.:D
 
Kaapstad said:
No problems, with all the results I have posted in the last 24hrs its easy to miss one.

The one for a single GPU im quite proud of, over 11000 for half of a GTX 690.:D

I know I can not compete with the people with real GTX 680s or HD 7970s but im having some good fun. I must try the latest drivers soon.:D
Click to expand...

Having fun and not breaking things is what it is about. I take my hat off to JD for pushing the volts like he did, as I don't have the balls for that. Hopefully tomorrow will be a different story though and I say Bring it AMD bitch's :p
 
gregster said:
Having fun and not breaking things is what it is about. I take my hat off to JD for pushing the volts like he did, as I don't have the balls for that. Hopefully tomorrow will be a different story though and I say Bring it AMD bitch's :p
Click to expand...


Do your blocks arrive tomorrow per chance?:D

Tried pushing the volts on mine,
anything over 1.3v achieved downclocking :(

@Kaapstad

Those new drivers cheeky little performance boost :D
 
Kaapstad said:
No problems, with all the results I have posted in the last 24hrs its easy to miss one.

The one for a single GPU im quite proud of, over 11000 for half of a GTX 690.:D

I know I can not compete with the people with real GTX 680s or HD 7970s but im having some good fun. I must try the latest drivers soon.:D
Click to expand...

Nice on kap.

It does compete. As you can see, may not be top but it sure competes.

But to be honest. Single gpu scores make our cards look bad. Ain't no ati card on that list faster than ours (ATM)
 
whyscotty said:
Do your blocks arrive tomorrow per chance?:D

Tried pushing the volts on mine,
anything over 1.3v achieved downclocking :(
Click to expand...

I paid a fortune for 1 day european delivery so they better :D I am not such a fan of the EK ones but they still look pretty good. AquaGFX does look top dog though.

Convince the Mrs you need them water blocks bro.
 
gregster said:
Having fun and not breaking things is what it is about. I take my hat off to JD for pushing the volts like he did, as I don't have the balls for that. Hopefully tomorrow will be a different story though and I say Bring it AMD bitch's :p
Click to expand...

Is it tomorrow your fitting your waterblocks, if it is I hope all goes well.

Don't forget to take some pics, people fitting GPUs with waterblocks gets covered a lot less than cooling the CPU.

Good luck and as I say I hope all goes well.
 
Kaapstad said:
Is it tomorrow your fitting your waterblocks, if it is I hope all goes well.

Don't forget to take some pics, people fitting GPUs with waterblocks gets covered a lot less than cooling the CPU.

Good luck and as I say I hope all goes well.
Click to expand...

Cheers Kap :)

I hope so but had no tracking number, so a little worried. I will be taking pics and scratching my head a few times I bet.
 
james_2k said:
Nice on kap.

It does compete. As you can see, may not be top but it sure competes.

But to be honest. Single gpu scores make our cards look bad. Ain't no ati card on that list faster than ours (ATM)
Click to expand...

Thanks

I found out why my cards were scoring so low - I was using the 301.42 drivers which are good for quad sli but no use for single or 2 GPUs. As soon as I switched to 306.23 I was getting over 20900 for a single card. Unfortunately 306.23 is not good for quad sli.
 
Try the latest betas. They give good returns :)

Edit:

I have only SLI tested and done a suicide run to get top spot back in the single card results but I am impressed.
 
Kaapstad said:
Thanks

I found out why my cards were scoring so low - I was using the 301.42 drivers which are good for quad sli but no use for single or 2 GPUs. As soon as I switched to 306.23 I was getting over 20900 for a single card. Unfortunately 306.23 is not good for quad sli.
Click to expand...

Ah cool, nice one. Still need a few more though ;)
 
Kaapstad said:
Im quite pleased with my err GTX 680 stock speed is only 915 mhz, but oced its boosting to over 1215mhz.

MyBrains you have already got me beat your graphics score is way better.:p
Click to expand...

Yea its all just a bit of fun.. shame i cant hit 1200 without getting artifacts all over the GPU Test 2 :rolleyes:

Anyway i just did another run at 1187/1675 and got P11064 but only up to 11031 on the GPU..

My Physics score is up and down like a yoyo at the same settings each time i run 3DMark. Maybe i'll try 5.1 on the CPU when i get a better heatsink fan.. might hit 12000 for physics with that :)

SCORE
P11064 3DMarks
GRAPHICS SCORE
11031
PHYSICS SCORE
11921
COMBINED SCORE
10197

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4736227

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/3rgmc/

Puts me back up a place but im gona try 1700 on the memory now while i have the fan out :D

Edit.. Nope its not having 1700 memory even with 1.68v and i dont wana go any higher.. oh well :)
 
Last edited:
Haven't been on this forum for a few days, cant believe I dropped 8 places down on the single GPU chart:( was 18TH, some amazing score's seen on here lately! It must be getting COLD:D!!!

I need to get my ass into gear and do some serious overclocking to compete:confused:

Nice Score's guys:D

Hopefully my watercooling project been finshed soon, then- i'll be back:p
 
Christ greg when i did my run earlier i only had my processor running at 4.1ghz, why didnt someone tell me. Will re-run later.
 
LtMatt said:
Christ greg when i did my run earlier i only had my processor running at 4.1ghz, why didnt someone tell me. Will re-run later.
Click to expand...

We all just put your low score down to the fact you were using one of those AMD cards.:p:p:p

Being serious for a minute, with the CPU @4.1ghz its a good score.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom