The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

Jonahun · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:35

AMDMatt said:
22% behind that, will have to see how much i can catch up on stock voltage. Over the weekend i will crank things up and unlock my cpu. Gpu usage was not always pegged at 99% during testing so i suspect i can get a few percent from knocking the cpu up to 4.9Ghz. Crazy when you think you need so much cpu power to drive these things.

Burn it to Max! Matt

HaHa, Mad

SiDeards73 · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:36

Interested to see some 1440p benchmarks and can you scale 4k on a 1440p panel? If so would like to see that also

Was adamant yesterday I wouldn't touch this card, however today and this evening after looking at some 1440 scores I'm having a change of heart, not only considering one but now considering 2. Got room in my Enthoo Primo for them, but would I need to upgrade from my z87 and 4770k to get the most from 2?

muziqaz · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:36

Waiting for my 2 Sapphires to be shipped. Any word on next batch of sapphires to UK?
Hopefully fury(non x) will bring some Xs over as well

LtMatt · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:36

I can improve my stock score a little i think. I'll work on that tomorrow if i get time or if not Saturday.

One things for sure, you need a golden clocking 5960X to get the best out of Quad Fury X cards. Roll on DX12 folks, could be some interesting changes once it happens.

whyscotty · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:37

SiDeards73 said:
Interested to see some 1440p benchmarks and can you scale 4k on a 1440p panel? If so would like to see that also

Was adamant yesterday I wouldn't touch this card, however today and this evening after looking at some 1440 scores I'm having a change of heart, not only considering one but now considering 2. Got room in my Enthoo Primo for them, but would I need to upgrade from my z87 and 4770k to get the most from 2?

Wouldn't have thought so, but then win10 is around the corner so that'll help too.

Mtom · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:38

Boomstick777 said:
Cheers guys, PakJai I do think it is worth getting one. It's a massive step up from the 290X in every way. The design, cooling. Temps during gaming. Performance are all top notch.

I'm on 15.15.1004 mate. I think that's what Matt said are the latest for Fury X.

Thanks...i think 15.200 is the fastest (but ofc not official yet), but 15.15 is the most stable driver but for that don't have all the bells and whistles...it could be faster with that if you wanna make a comparison.

Scougar · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:41

Are there any DX12 benchmarks?

Stanners · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:43

Scougar said:
Are there any DX12 benchmarks?

Only in peoples heads

Gerard · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:43

Theories about the wrong driver revision used for reviews incoming.

http://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrac...y_x_possibly_reviewed_with_incorrect_drivers/

Silent_Scone · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:44

Yes, apparently the one on AMDs FTP is the wrong driver. The one that should have been used puts the cards in a better light. Not massively better but it competes with the TX more consistently

flopper · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:45

Scougar said:
Are there any DX12 benchmarks?

wont happen until windows 10 enters the arena.

LoadsaMoney · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:45

SiDeards73 said:
Interested to see some 1440p benchmarks and can you scale 4k on a 1440p panel? If so would like to see that also

Was adamant yesterday I wouldn't touch this card, however today and this evening after looking at some 1440 scores I'm having a change of heart, not only considering one but now considering 2. Got room in my Enthoo Primo for them, but would I need to upgrade from my z87 and 4770k to get the most from 2?

Yeah looks to be a cracker at 1440p, was looking at those results myself, as im going to move up to that res.

Stanners · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:45

Silent_Scone said:
Yes, apparently the one on AMDs FTP is the wrong driver. The one that should have been used puts the cards in a better light. Not massively better but it competes with the TX more consistently

If this is true.... Beyond words.

Jonahun · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:45

Gerard said:
Theories about the wrong driver revision used for reviews incoming.

http://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrac...y_x_possibly_reviewed_with_incorrect_drivers/

AMD PR failed again, why they can't put them together just once please? Hardware-Software-PR, job done, it's not a rocket science...

Gerard · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:45

If its legit then someone at amd is probably being flogged badly :eek:

muziqaz · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:46

I don't know if that has been asked/answered, but Sapphire box says 450MB/s bandwidth. What is that all about?

Stanners · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:46

Gerard said:
If its legit then someone at amd is probably being flogged badly

Thing is, If this is true. Where is this driver, Is it out now?

eyetrip · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:46

flopper said:
I was going to buy a Titan x err 980ti but the heat and noise simply was to much for me. I mean cant they make a cool and silent cooling solution at entusiast for reference?

/sarcasm off

Glad your enjoying your Fury

The temp of the card has nothing to do with heat output.

Whether it was running 100 degrees on at, or 50 degrees using an aio, it would be putting out the same amount of heat.

Anyway, Matt , love the look of your new setup. Four of them does look pretty sweet.

Gerard · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:47

Stanners said:
Thing is, If this is true. Where is this driver, Is it out now?

Possibly rolling it out to reviewers hoping they do a rerun.

Stanners · 25 Jun 2015 at 20:48

Gerard said:
Possibly rolling it out to reviewers hoping they do a rerun.

But why not give to the people who have spent there hard earned?

Disgraceful if they are sat on it while people have shelled out for the card.

Of course non of this maybe true