You're clearly not playing more demanding games man.I'm sitting here doing just that (Asus ROG Swift) - ok 1-2 more recent games I don't play but plenty of recent stuff I do play at ultra settings without any problems at all.
I think a lot of review sites are still testing Kepler 2.0 cards with Boost 1.0 methodologies as that is the only way the numbers make sense (I do have a 970 as well and I still use the 780 over it in most cases for a reason :S).
EDIT: Not that I'd suggest anyone went for a Kepler card over the alternatives these days - but I sit and look at many of the benchmarks coming out of major sites and scratch my head - problem is a lot of the review sites don't seem to run tests that are easily reproduced to do a direct comparison against their results.
And no, it has nothing to do with testing methodology. I follow user performance reports just as much as benchmarks and a 970 is just about *always* ahead of a 780, usually by a clear margin. Plus a 970 can be overclocked more. And I'm talking about real game performance, not artificial benchmarks.
And as a 970 owner with a decent OC, I can assure you that it's nowhere near good enough for 1440p/60fps at max settings in everything. In *most* graphics-heavy games, my card is only about good enough for 1080p/60fps at high-ultra(mostly ultra to be fair). It seriously does take a 980Ti to do what you're claiming you can do.
You're either lying, exaggerating or are mistaken. You do not have a magic GTX 780.
Made up, or jumping to conclusions based on very loose evidence and passing it off as fact.As 8Pack said the other day those that do know are bound by NDAs and you don't really get the leaks like used to happen any more - 90% of the rumour articles are made up.
Last edited: