Leaked ET;QW Beta Screenshots

Lonewolf · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:03

Enough screens to keep you amused for a while I expect.

Lets hear your opinions based upon what you see. Remember, this game is not ground breaking in terms of graphics.

Let the Drooling Begin

Defcon5 · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:06

Looks like BF2 with bigger draw distances. Unless im missing something?

scooby555t · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:06

yeah thats nothing new to me am in the beta and all ive got to say to much bunny hopping just like every other quake game if they remove it or limited it to like bf2142 then it would be good

thecremeegg · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:12

hmm, looks a middle ground between bf2 and 2142....nothin special :confused:

Gerard · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:12

Woulda preferred to have seen some gameplay footage to see if this is the hopathon that earlier impressions indicated it would be :rolleyes:

Theres already meant to be an infinite sprint in the game because the maps are so big, so bouncing about like a tard is not needed.

SK07 · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:18

These are quite old. Due to the fact im part of a team thats affiliated with Activision we already seen them.

Lonewolf · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:19

These screens were posted in May, I just came across them tonight.

z0mbi3 · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:25

tbh it's not showing anything you can't see in existing trailers. I'd guess that those screenies are system limited though.

Would just like to get my hands on the game now.

Gerard · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:28

z0mbi3 said:
tbh it's not showing anything you can't see in existing trailers. I'd guess that those screenies are system limited though.

Would just like to get my hands on the game now.

Same here, looks interesting if they get the gameplay right and don't stick to deathmatch gameplay. Some people are under the impresion that since it has "quake" in the name that it should play the same as quake 3 or 4 on bigger maps with vehicles. Really innovative if it turns that way, in other words id yet again afraid to try anything new and sucking up to people that seem to want to play the same game year in year out with different graphics.

Posty · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:38

cant wait till its released more people on the servers will be a nice change

Psypher5 · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:43

oh god the textures.

They better pump them up a bit.

Gerard · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:45

Psypher5 said:
oh god the textures.

They better pump them up a bit.

Just a beta so its likely the hi res stuff was removed to make the dload smaller.

Psypher5 · 10 Jun 2007 at 23:52

point, but still. They could have beta tested the textures

Whats the game style like? bf2/2142 or what? Never played ET, any info

?

BloodWolf · 11 Jun 2007 at 00:17

It's well BF2.

Phil99 · 11 Jun 2007 at 00:25

BF2 looks good enough for me, so those shots look ok, especially considering they may not have been taken on a high spec pc and it probably doesn't have all the hi-res stuff, as someone has already said.

The main thing is the gameplay anyway, should be good getting back to mission based multiplayer instead of just capture the flag...hopefully it'll be good anyway. Enemy Territory was great fun IMO, so I have high hopes for this

Neoni · 11 Jun 2007 at 00:27

looks boring ill stick to Et Wolfenstein.

benjo · 11 Jun 2007 at 00:38

I can't believe how much that looks like BF2/2142. Just looks like some sort of mod for it.

Was expecting a lot more after the first screenshots we got ages ago.

Tom|Nbk · 11 Jun 2007 at 00:57

Is everyone missing the fact its obviously been run on ultra low settings with no AA at all so therefore is not a fair representation on how most people will play it :confused:

.

House · 11 Jun 2007 at 01:37

I take it the people saying BF2/2142 arent taking into account the fact there are objectives in these maps?

Sime · 11 Jun 2007 at 01:39

I really hope thats someone playing the game on low settings...Ive alaways thoguht it was jsut gonna be the same gameplay as BF2 / 2142 but with objectives instead of flags...Which is awesome, but still not very innotative. Guess we'll jsut have to wiat and see.