http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Richard-paid-13-year-old-schoolgirl-sex.html
erm... if you're paying for it then surely you'd best make sure she's at least 18.... and if in doubt perhaps check ID - tis not like he picked her up in a nightclub, he had to pay for this girl and her friend to get on a train to come and meet him FFS... (since she obviously doesn't drive!)
What do you think - was he really just naive and thought they were a couple of teenagers who were at least 16 (v.dodgy territory but not necessarily illegal per say)? Or is he a full on nonce many other celebs and people in power are turning out the be these days?
A businessman who once appeared on Dragons' Den paid a 13-year-old girl hundreds of pounds for sex after meeting her on a 'sugar daddy' website, a court heard today.
Doug Richard, 57, allegedly arranged for the girl and a 15-year-old friend to join him at a £149-a-night apartment in central London.
The Californian admits sexual activity did occur with the child, but claims it was consensual and he believed she was at least 16 at the time.
erm... if you're paying for it then surely you'd best make sure she's at least 18.... and if in doubt perhaps check ID - tis not like he picked her up in a nightclub, he had to pay for this girl and her friend to get on a train to come and meet him FFS... (since she obviously doesn't drive!)
What do you think - was he really just naive and thought they were a couple of teenagers who were at least 16 (v.dodgy territory but not necessarily illegal per say)? Or is he a full on nonce many other celebs and people in power are turning out the be these days?