£1,000,000 to spend on Freesync monitor

Since you won the lottery then hire live actors to act out the game in your lounge. It's a lot more fun that some poopy monitor.
 
Doogles said:
Get G-Sync and a 1080ti, you have 1 mil you stingy bugger!
Click to expand...

LOL...... Epic joke of the year. The lineup of gsync monitors is horrible compared to Freesync monitors.
Not a single one 2560x1440 or higher monitor exists that worth their money.

The LG has some good gsync ones coming out, but people have to wait for March, and Freesync monitors are coming also with same panels at same time (and far cheaper).
 
Panos said:
LOL...... Epic joke of the year. The lineup of gsync monitors is horrible compared to Freesync monitors.
Not a single one 2560x1440 or higher monitor exists that worth their money.

The LG has some good gsync ones coming out, but people have to wait for March, and Freesync monitors are coming also with same panels at same time (and far cheaper).
Click to expand...
That is opinion, 165hz 2560x1440 and ultrawide 100hz are about, just because you don't like G-Sync being a £200 premium doesn't mean they arn't worth it for some, G-Sync was too costly for me so went Freesync instead but kinda regret it.

What is worth the money when it comes to PC hardware, we could all agrue how a R3 with GTX 1050 is enough and nothing else is worth the money.
 
Panos said:
LOL...... Epic joke of the year. The lineup of gsync monitors is horrible compared to Freesync monitors.
Not a single one 2560x1440 or higher monitor exists that worth their money.

The LG has some good gsync ones coming out, but people have to wait for March, and Freesync monitors are coming also with same panels at same time (and far cheaper).
Click to expand...

Gsync monitors are quite good but TBH if Nvidia would just support freesync, I would get a freesync one instead. I do think Gsync is a bit better than freesync, but not worth another 200. Freesync is better in that its cheaper and has a lot of monitors available now. I do think you statement "line up of gsync monitors horrible" is a bit ridiculous, the Gsync monitors are mostly better, but yes the price of Gsync is horrible. Also what would be the best thing, would be TV's with HDMI 2.1 120hz 4k adaptive sync... there would be pretty much no reason to get a monitor when they are available. But then some monitors coming out look good, like the 512 zone FALD 35" 200hz 3440x1440 etc.
 
The six 77" LG OLED's just arrived, it's bloody awesome.

Also picked up a couple of Bugatti Chrirons, I wasn't sure of what colour to buy so I bought one in each colour.

Yes I know you're all jealous but no I won't post photos.
 
Nexus18 said:
People have been using their 2017 OLEDs with no "permanent" burn in at all and these are people that say they have racked up hours in BF 1 amongst other games with heavy HUDs. So far I've had 4+ hour sessions on mine, not a sign of anything at all and if anything does appear, it will go with a compensation cycle that runs after every 4 hours of usage whilst in standby and for any severe burn in, there is a more thorough compensation cycle run. Of course if you are using it for desktop usage 24/7 then yup there might be some "permanent" burn in eventually but most people aren't that stupid....

2017 OLEDs are 120HZ @ 1080P

Yup no sync is a bummer, maybe next year TVs will have it but not an issue for me especially with amds new sync, it is extremely impressive and there have been a few people who have been happy to give up sync just to have all of oleds superior benefits.
Click to expand...

So it's real 120hz @ 1080p that's awesome. But... do you have to do upscaling for it to look decent because it is a 4k native screen right?
 
Nexus18 said:
Yes I believe it is similar, although I've seen a few say it is better than fast sync.
Click to expand...

Enhanced sync allows for some tearing - its closer to but not the same as nVidia Adaptive V-Sync - FastSync in theory should never tear under any circumstances but might sometimes induce stutter.
 
mattpj said:
So it's real 120hz @ 1080p that's awesome. But... do you have to do upscaling for it to look decent because it is a 4k native screen right?
Click to expand...

Yup real 120HZ @1080p, tested via ufotest site.

Scaling is superb at 1080P, no issues at all, not even with the HUD, as you can see in some photos from here:

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/4k-ultrawide-gsync-120hz.18745012/page-2#post-31410261

Personally I don't notice a huge difference between 4k and 1080P in games/films, only when text is involved and even then, 1080P isn't bad, once games start using 4k textures and the like then I'm sure the difference will be more noticeable.

Given the size, I sit pretty far back though so PPI isn't as much of an issue.

And yup, it's not like most monitors, which have terrible support for anything apart from their native res.

Rroff said:
Enhanced sync allows for some tearing - its closer to but not the same as nVidia Adaptive V-Sync - FastSync in theory should never tear under any circumstances but might sometimes induce stutter.
Click to expand...

I haven't seen any tearing with enhanced sync no matter the FPS, however, there is micro stutter in some scenarios, mainly when dropping below refresh rate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom