where did u put ur speakers?
Have you tried going on the Dell live chat and haggling? It's what I did earlier on. Couldn't quite get the rep to match the lowest price I've seen but came out ordering for £879. Still not amazing but better than the over 1k they want for it. Though weirdly I can see a pending payment on my account for £600. Not sure why it's not the full amount.
Thanks Jon, managed to get a quote for £849. Just got to decide whether that is best value for money or if the LG is worth the additional £300 (which I'm struggling to see how it will be).
No problem I usually get swayed towards Dell monitors just for the customer support. Had an issue with a 2716DG monitor, was flickering at times. Got replaced after a few emails, no problem. That and the advanced replacement and no dead pixel policy.Thanks Jon, managed to get a quote for £849. Just got to decide whether that is best value for money or if the LG is worth the additional £300 (which I'm struggling to see how it will be).
(tidied since then, had just set it up )
Im loving mine aswell(1080 version), but the fisheye/stretchyness effect is not great the wider the screen is. I run most my games in 2560x1080 to minimize the fisheye/stretchyness effect. I have my speakers a few inches ubove my monitor on a shelf.
what is the fish eye/stretchiness? are you saying you run it in a non 32:9 resolution? doesn't that defeat the purpose of having one.
Having used a 32:9 vs a 21:9 i found the 21:9 (for games that support it) far superior. I wasn't missing the vertical resolution as much as just being totally mesmermised by how much immersion i had. Maybe I sit too close to my monitor but the default height we have not based off a 27inch 1440p screen seems fine for me.Imho the res that works best for gaming is 21:9, once you go past that it becomes very noticeable that your filling out the width but lacking the height.
what is the fish eye/stretchiness? are you saying you run it in a non 32:9 resolution? doesn't that defeat the purpose of having one.
Yes 2560x1080 is 21:9, its odd tho because when watching racing replys back, they dont stretch at all.Imho the res that works best for gaming is 21:9, once you go past that it becomes very noticeable that your filling out the width but lacking the height.
what turns me off 32:9 the most is being a beta tester. that and the desk space/lack of support/fish eye distortion on some games/performance cost/
to be fair though, the fish eye didnt bother me as its in the periperhy of ur vision.
Thats the main reason I went for the 1080 version of the 49", so it wasn't so demanding on my pc and the text size wasn't too small either.. But yeah I hate the ratio being wrong on tv's or monitors as I cant stand pictures being stretched.
Another option is the CRG9 which is what I'm deviating towards and pushing me to sell one of them. But Now typing this, I feel it might be a mistake as I've had not so great experiences with Samsung screens.
I have been thinking about the CRG9 but my monitor that just went pop was also a Samsung. However, I have dual 27" monitors and the CRG9 makes sense as a direct replacement for both in terms of size but I'm not sure whether a single 34" UW will be a better fit.
Yeah I think I agree with you. Just got to decide whether I go for the Alienware AW3418DW for £850 or the LG 34GK950F for £1,150.
Yeah I think I agree with you. Just got to decide whether I go for the Alienware AW3418DW for £850 or the LG 34GK950F for £1,150.
I have one in the members market for £700 still with 1000 days of warranty 1-2 months old
I did see your monitor in the MM but unfortunately you aren't that local to me!
Thanks all for your help