Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
If so, then I guess it is a bit of a non story, but it is nonetheless disappointing that Nvidia is releasing a product that is unable to maintain at least the advertised boost clocks for 20 minutes!
I really think that in 12 months time we are going to look back on this as a very expensive, not very good card. I hope the Ti is better.
The Founder's Edition, sure. We've not seen what 3rd party coolers can do yet, though. And I dont understand why so many people are so eager to write it off before we've seen them.I really think that in 12 months time we are going to look back on this as a very expensive, not very good card. I hope the Ti is better.
I really think that in 12 months time we are going to look back on this as a very expensive, not very good card. I hope the Ti is better.
Another 12 months after than the ti wont look good either.
You're sure it wont based purely on the reference cooler?That's not my point. Its not the age of the card. Its how it performs during its 'time" and how it's remembered. For example the 980ti will always be remembered as a great card as will the 290. I don't think the 1080 will be. In fact. I'm sure it won't.
I think the issue being Greg is that they are throttling to below the advertised boost clock. I can't speak from experience because anytime I have used a reference card I have always made a more aggresive fan profile, but have the reference Titan X's for example throttled to below their advertised boost clock on a regular basis using stock profile?
If so, then I guess it is a bit of a non story, but it is nonetheless disappointing that Nvidia is releasing a product that is unable to maintain at least the advertised boost clocks for 20 minutes!
That's not my point. Its not the age of the card. Its how it performs during its 'time" and how it's remembered. For example the 980ti will always be remembered as a great card as will the 290. I don't think the 1080 will be. In fact. I'm sure it won't.
That's not my point. Its not the age of the card. Its how it performs during its 'time" and how it's remembered. For example the 980ti will always be remembered as a great card as will the 290. I don't think the 1080 will be. In fact. I'm sure it won't.
You're sure it wont based purely on the reference cooler?
![]()
That's not my point. Its not the age of the card. Its how it performs during its 'time" and how it's remembered. For example the 980ti will always be remembered as a great card as will the 290. I don't think the 1080 will be. In fact. I'm sure it won't.
LOL. There is a lot more wrong with this card than just the reference cooler. Alas I won't go into details because I will just get called a fan boy. Look a YouTube videos that are made by people who are not sponsored reviewers.
Reference coolers suck even if you call them founders editions.
You guys have no idea...A small single fan just isn't going to cut it. A wind force 3 fan set up should work just nicely!
lol? People really need to wait for the custom versions. You say how good the 290 is but do you remember how **** the reference 290/290x cooler was? loud and 95 degrees I seem to remember...
Or will you not go into details because they're desperate, reaching arguments that one would normally associate with fanboy-like behavior?LOL. There is a lot more wrong with this card than just the reference cooler. Alas I won't go into details because I will just get called a fan boy. Look a YouTube videos that are made by people who are not sponsored reviewers.
Congrats on having a magic reference 290X. I think we saw enough proof that yours was a major, major exception and not the rule.When i had a ref cooler on my 290x, it maxed out at 70c, with 55% fan speed with the clocks @1100/1500 with +60mv