There comes a point where increased cache not only doesn't help - it actually gets in the way.
If you look at the cycle of cache to performance increase you can see that the difference it has actually made each time has got a lot smaller.
2-4mb, 4-8mb, 8-16mb - each time the cache doubled but performance really hit the peak at around the 8mb mark.
It was other included technologies that gave the performance boosts with the later drives.
Following that, 32mb shouldn't really help at all so anything going beyond would be a waste of time (and money).
How speculative is this?
If you look at the cycle of cache to performance increase you can see that the difference it has actually made each time has got a lot smaller.
2-4mb, 4-8mb, 8-16mb - each time the cache doubled but performance really hit the peak at around the 8mb mark.
It was other included technologies that gave the performance boosts with the later drives.
Following that, 32mb shouldn't really help at all so anything going beyond would be a waste of time (and money).
How speculative is this?